Thoughts from the Frontline

A Player to Be Named Later

December 10, 2011

Choose your language

We have come to the end of yet another European Summit that was supposed to be the one to fix the problem. If you are confused as to what happened then you are not alone. Was it something we will look back on in ten years and say, "This was where it all started," or will it be viewed as just another meeting in what will prove to be a string of even more meetings? I will argue that both views are the correct answer, depending on your frame of reference.

But what did come out of the meeting was that some very clear lines were drawn. Will those lines look like the one that Colonel Travis drew with his sword at the Alamo, where those who crossed and joined him knew their fate? Or will it be more like the fabled French Maginot line, thought to be impregnable, which Germany simply went around? Stark comparisons, I know. But then, the choices and sides of the lines you choose to be on offer very stark consequences.

I should acknowledge that I spent a great deal of time the last two days reading and talking with friends from around the world, trying to make sense of the omelet that we were served in Europe. Exactly what is in it? This letter is somewhat speculative on my part, taken from my gathered impressions over the week and informed by my readings over the years. I will use some simple analogies to try and make things clear. And I know that using such simple devices has its limitations, but those are the tools that I have to work with. They will have to suffice. I hope they also inform.

But first, and speaking of conversations, as part of my discussions on Europe I have scheduled two Conversations next week, one with Lacy Hunt and the other with Barry Ritholtz and Jim Bianco. They will be recorded and transcribed as soon as we can, so that subscribers to Conversations with John Mauldin can listen in before the holiday season arrives. Plus those fabulous archives, with Mohamed El-Erian, David Rosenberg, George Friedman (hmm, I need to do another one with him soon – so much is happening!), Richard Yamarone, Gary Shilling, Nouriel Roubini, and many more. You can "eavesdrop" on my earnest chats with my friends about what's on our minds, just like being at the table. And for the holidays, if you use the code CONV when the signup process asks for one, you get $50 off the regular subscription price. You can subscribe (and learn more) at http://www.johnmauldin.com/conversations/landing/. Join us! And now, let's jump right in.

There are two main points to be taken away from this week's meetings. First, the Germans really took control. This has been coming for a long time, and it's not like we haven't discussed it in these letters. Second, Britain either opted out or was shown the door, depending on your point of view. That is the real game-changer, long-term, for more than the obvious reasons. Let's start with what did not happen, which…

Discuss This

8 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

Roger Wiegley

Dec. 12, 2011, 5:51 a.m.

“And if you want to play you will have to get your fiscal house in order. Germany will not kick you out, but you will lose access to financing if you don’t get your budget under control.”  The PIIGS will agree to these rules because they have no choice but they simply cannot comply with them.  Their voters will not tolerate the consequences.  And when non-compliance occurs, is Germany really going to cut off funding?  Really?  That would be shooting itself in the head.  The concept of “strict fiscal rules that must be obeyed or else” is delusional.

Gerald Carr

Dec. 11, 2011, 5:52 p.m.

Finland won’t buy it, Turkey will balk, the seeds of doubt will be planted.  Sell the Euro.

Fred Pollack

Dec. 11, 2011, 11:19 a.m.

A good short analysis of the EU summit results was provided by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in the UK telegraph:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8947322/EU-treaty-dont-blame-UK-for-eurozones-failure-to-put-its-house-in-order.html
Excerpt:
“It tarts up the old Stability Pact without changing the substance (although there will be prior vetting of budgets). This “fiscal compact” is not going to make to make the slightest impression on global markets, and they are the judges who matter in this trial by fire.
Yes, there is more discipline for fiscal sinners, but without any transforming help. Even the old “Marshall Plan” of the July summit has bitten the dust.
There is no shared debt issuance, no fiscal transfers, no move to an EU Treasury, no banking licence for the ESM rescue fund, and no change in the mandate of the European Central Bank.
In short, there is no breakthrough of any kind that will convince Asian investors that this monetary union has viable governance or even a future.
Germany has kept the focus exclusively on fiscal deficits even though everybody must understand by now that this crisis was not caused by fiscal deficits (except in the case of Greece). Spain and Ireland were in surplus, and Italy had a primary surplus.
As Sir Mervyn King said last week, the disaster was caused by current account imbalances (Spain’s deficit, and Germany’s surplus), and by capital flows setting off private sector credit booms.”

Elizabeth Waite

Dec. 11, 2011, 7:29 a.m.

I had the wonderful experience of living in England for 9 years (my father was active duty Air Force).  I had the privilege of traveling extensively through out Europe during those 9 years. I cannot image that The Eurozone will ever break up, the need each other.  Here is a comparison ...... how successful do you think the state of South Carolina would be if it “left” the USA?  How about Florida? What about New Mexico?  IMHO, none of these states would fair very well if they exited The USA.

Charles Breese

Dec. 11, 2011, 6 a.m.

I see a couple of extra dimensions to the Eurozone debate, namely:

a) You mention Germany’s shrinking workforce and growing social security obligations. These two problems can be solved at a stroke by people remaining in work for longer than is the current practise before they can claim a state pension - it is always open to individuals to save for their old age and retire at a time of their choosing. You mentioned a couple of months ago that when the state pension retirement age was set in the US in the 1930s it was higher than the average life expectation by some four years - this could be a simple algorithm for setting the age when the state pension kicks in and would auiomatically cater for changes in average life expectancy.

b) Europe is run by a huge unelected bureaucracy which makes a large number of decisions which defy commonsense ie bad decisions. Now that we have moved from an Era of Abundance to an Era of Austerity, there is no way that any sensible individual would wish to have decisions made on his behalf in this expensive, self serving and inefficient manner.

A person for whom I have huge respect includes the following at the foot of his emails!

“Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius—and a lot of courage—to move in the opposite direction.”

Knut Gorm Jorgensen

Dec. 11, 2011, 4:15 a.m.

Great article. 

What I am missing is that the problem is STRUCTUAL.  My former professor Friedman had it right.  He predicted that the euro is going to fall apart at the first large crisis in the EU. 

The argument why the euro was and is a HUGE mistake is very simple:  the high school completion rate in Portugal is about 28%, while in Germany about 85%. 

How on earth can those two country have the same currency?

The French HATE to be controlled by the Germans. President Mitterrand was stupid enough to believe that by having a euro, that Germany could be controlled/taken advantage of.

Sarkozyâ??s main rival at the up-coming election is Hollande.  He is running against Sarkozy on the main part of the agreements just made in the EU!

Within less than four months, the latest EU agreement will be shown to be as stupid as the last â??rescue fund.â?

Thanks again for a very informative article.

Knut Gorm Jorgensen

Ed Carpenter

Dec. 10, 2011, 11:52 p.m.

Mr. Mauldin,
I have been reading your email newsletters for a few years.  The European mess that you discussed in
â??A Player to Be Named Laterâ? brought some really horrific thoughts to my limited knowledge of German History.  Without looking it up, I believe that one of Adolph Hitlerâ??s main objectives was the domination of Europe by Germany.  While he failed to do it militarily, it would appear on the surface that the current state of affairs is going to allow Ms. Merkel to pull it of peacefully, and it appears that the sheep will timidly file into the pen one-by-one until indeed Mr. Hitlerâ??s vision has been fulfilled.

If not Germany, then the fundamental Islamists will take Europe by virtue of the political correctness of the masses.  Then, John, it will be us against them once again.

It is truly a scary world out there.

Yancey Ward

Dec. 10, 2011, 1:34 p.m.

I think you are correct that the Germans have drawn the line in the sand, but this line is the Maginot Line that the French, Italians, and others are trying to go around.  Here is the way I see it playing out- the ECB is being lured into ongoing bond purchases to such an extent that it cannot extract itself- ever.  Then, once it is committed, the other countries in the pact will no longer abide by the deficit restrictions, if they ever do at all at any point.  I am guessing promises of balanced budgets get the ECB monetizing long before balanced budgets are scheduled to appear.