Thoughts from the Frontline

Muddle Through, or Crisis?

May 7, 2011

Choose your language

This week I finish the two-part letter on the Endgame and give you my thoughts on the economy and how it all plays out over the next five years. This is the second part of a speech I gave last week at the Strategic Investment Conference in La Jolla. It is a rather bold forecast, and fraught with peril and likely errors, but that is my job here. Damn the torpedoes, etc. I must offer one large caveat! If the facts change so will my forecast, but this is the view into my very cloudy crystal ball as I see it today. As always, remember that those of us in the forecasting world are often wrong but seldom in doubt. Read accordingly.

But before we get there, two quick things. I want to really show my strong appreciation for the work done by my co-hosts, Altegris Investments, at the 8th annual Strategic Investment Conference. We had a packed house with almost 500 people come to see what I think was the best line-up at an investment conference this year. Each year we say there is no way to get any better, and each year we somehow manage to do so. And that is due in no small part to the considerable effort of the team at Altegris. I am proud to be associated with them. This year we did video many of the speakers and panels, and over time we will figure out how to make some of this available. I will keep you posted.

Enemy of Spain

Second, Endgame continues to do well, so thanks to those who have purchased it, and if you haven’t already got your copy you should go to www.amazon.com/endgame and do so! And quick kudos to my co-author, Jonathan Tepper, brilliant young Rhodes scholar and head analyst at Variant Perception. Apparently, he’s on a small but prestigious list of enemies of Spain, according to El Mundo, one of the biggest Spanish newspapers, for the sin of pointing out that Spain is in a crisis (we have a whole chapter on Spain on the book). Their article appeared in print in the weekly finance edition, but is not online. Other papers have been called by government officials and asked not to quote him. Oddly, the people who helped inflate the enormous construction bubble and the incompetent government officials who denied for years there were any problems are not enemies of Spain. Go figure. I guess if you have to be on an enemies list, you could do worse than Spain (where, oddly enough, Jonathan spent most of his childhood growing up in a drug-rehab facility). Congratulations, young man! (Oh, and a publisher in Korea picked up the Endgame Korean-language rights, so we will soon be in bookstores in Seoul.)

And now to the second part of the Endgame. And for those who want to review the first part, you can read it at http://www.johnmauldin.com/frontlinethoughts/the-endgame-headwinds/.

The Endgame, Part 2

There is an argument that the US should pursue a strong growth and jobs policy as its #1 goal and that growth, along with spending cuts and/or tax increases (depending on your views), will bring us out of the current doldrums and help us solve the budget deficit. I set the table in both the book and last week’s letter that the US is going to be growth challenged…

Discuss This

21 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

Page 1 of 3  1 2 3 > 

Robert Pezick

May 24, 2011, 10:24 a.m.

I don’ t understand how it is a given that the size of government is a drag on the economy.  REF: “...demonstrates that at some point the size of government becomes a drag on the economy…”  The size of the federal government ‘workforce’ has shrunken over the last 25 years, ever since Ronald Reagan left office.  A tthe same time, the population of the country has grown, and therefore the size of the federal government as a percentage of the population, has gone down.  Maybe the distinction is beween federal and state governments?  Just saying.

Peter LePort

May 15, 2011, 5:08 p.m.

Dear Mart Shu,

If you look at what was “deregulated” is was only removal of some provision with more regulations applied. The reason I used the term true deregulation and explained removing any regulation that introduces the force of government in the market was to address your issue. Look very carefully at any regulation, and/or deregulation and replacement regulations for those deregulated, in the light of the introduction of force by the government into the marketplace and you will see the cause of the destruction going on. If you removed all those regulations and insisted on no regulations but only laws that punish true violation of rights (violation caused by the introduction of initiated force) you would be on the way to a free market in this country. Read Ayn Rand’s Capitalism the Unkonwn Ideal and/or the Virtue of Selfishness.

Peter LePort

Matthew Perry

May 9, 2011, 2:58 p.m.

Dear John:

A very interesting article.  However, I must strongly disagree with your slant that gold in the future (for our great-great-grandchildren) will turn out to be a “NOVELTY from the days when we thought gold had value”.  Gold always has, and it will continue to, have VALUE.  The PRICE will fluctuate, but its VALUE will always be the same.  Allow me to explain why.

To understand the VALUE of gold (and silver), please consult a reliable dictionary and look up the definition of “MONEY”, since gold is the ultimate money.  Here is the definition of MONEY from THE AMERICAN COLLEGE DICTIONARY.

MONEY: 1. gold, silver, or other metal in pieces of convenient form stamped by public authority and issued as a medium of exchange and MEASURE OF VALUE.  2. current coin. 3. coin or certificate (as banknotes, etc.) generally accepted in payment of debts and current transactions.  4. any article of or substance similarly used, as checks on demand deposit, wampum, etc. 5. a particular form or denomination of currency.  6. a money of account. 7. property considered with reference to its pecuniary value.  etc.

Today the mainstream “geniuses” say that gold and silver have gone up in VALUE, but they are dead wrong.  Gold and silver have gone up in PRICE, not VALUE, because of the insane printing of paper fiat monies by the US, and now almost every other country trying to keep pace.  Also, wampum, which is in the form of oil, gasoline, wheat, corn, soybeans, etc. have (has) also gone up in PRICE in order to reflect the rapidly disintegrating paper dollar.

You can print paper “money” until the cows come home, but try printing gold, silver, copper, oil, wheat, corn, or wampum.  The American Indians accepted wampum because it has value and substance, something that excessive paper money does not possess.

All fiat currencies eventually fail…..that is a lesson of history.  Gold and silver do not fail, and NEVER go to zero.  Gold and silver may eventually go down in PRICE to reflect the TRUE VALUE of the dollar or other currency, but gold and silver will never go down in VALUE, as the previous definition of “money” conveys so accurately.  But DO NOT hold your breath, because our “genius” Fed cannot resist the temptation to print their way to “prosperity”.  That is why every fiat currency eventually FAILS.  Too much GREED, and TOO EASY TO PRINT!

GOLD AND SILVER WILL ALWAYS BE A MEASURE OF VALUE!  And my advice is to hold some for yourselves and your grandchildren, because GOLD AND SILVER can always quickly and easily be converted to the value of the currency at the time.  Do you think the dollar is going to SOAR IN VALUE in the forseeable future?

They say you cannot eat gold or silver, but you sure can buy lots of “eats” with gold and silver when the necessity arises.  In fact, if we would have all bought silver and gold in early 2000, we would be able to buy at least 5 (FIVE) times the “eats” today versus what we can holding worthless dollars during that same time period.

Just my opinions,

Matthew Perry

Matthew Perry

May 9, 2011, 11:24 a.m.

Dear John, and ALL WHO THINK GOLD (and SILVER) is a “NOVELTY FROM THE DAYS WHEN WE THOUGHT GOLD HAD VALUE”.

In order to get an understanding of gold and silver as a measure of VALUE, you need to get out your dictionaries and look up the DEFINITION of MONEY. 

To save you time, here is the definition from THE AMERICAN COLLEGE DICTIONARY:  MONEY 1. GOLD, SILVER, or other metal in pieces of convenient form stamped by public authority and issued as a medium of exchange and MEASURE OF VALUE. 2. current coin.  3. coin or certificate (as banknotes, etc.)generally accepted in payment of debts and current transactions. 4.  any article of substance similarly used, as checks on demand depost, WAMPUM, etc. 5. a particular form or denomination of currency.  6. a money of account.  7. property considered with reference to its pecuniary value.

In my opinion, it is the first and second definitions above that hold the key to what money REALLY is composed of.  It goes downhill from there, as we get into banknotes and paper (fiat) currencies.

All FIAT currencies eventually go bust, as the US dollar is currently in process.  And all the other ccountries are following suit to try to OUTPRINT each other.  Where is this going to end?  On the other hand, try printing gold and silver sometime.  GOOD LUCK!  Or for that matter, oil, wheat, corn, soy, etc.

So why buy gold and silver and other commodities?  Obviously, as these worthless paper currencies continue to depreciate more and more, the PRICE, not the VALUE, continues to soar.  This is not rocket science…..JUST GOOD OLD COMMON HORSE SENSE!  Gold and silver are no more VALUABLE today than they were many years ago, but the PRICE has risen to reflect the continuing degradation of paper currencies. 

So don’t complicate things unnecessarily.  JUST REMEMBER THE DEFINITION OF REAL MONEY!

MAD MATT

fred sauer

May 9, 2011, 9:54 a.m.

help with charts! 


often your outstanding charts are so reduced in size that they can’t be read. e.g. the “dependency” chart - its impossible to read any numbers on either axis - to copy it out and enlarge it also doesn’t work - not enough pixels.

N A

May 9, 2011, 2:47 a.m.

Since the mess we are in was created by us older generation retirees and baby boomers, may I suggest you write about a proportional tax increase on that semen of the population rather than taxing my grandson for what he had no voice. One suggestion might be to have a steep inheritance tax on the boomer generation that fades out over 20 years.  VAT is plain silly. A disportionate amount of taxes is born by the poorer struggling class. VAT on luxury, but not on necessities. Any human being that has a footprint of waste that is so large that he must fly in his own private jet, for example, can also pay a “wasteful” amount in taxes as well. 100 grand Luxury cars, 10,000 sq ft mansions, and even boob jobs should be taxed at 100, even 200%. Government employees and all union workers who enjoy the benefit of job security should also be taxed on a slightly higher scale. Finally phase in more controls on unnecessary medical procedures, place limits similar to medicare on pricing, and completely phase out welfare. (my grandson recently has 4 stiches… $900… Ridiculous!)

mart shu

May 9, 2011, 12:35 a.m.

Dear Peter LePort,
deregulation is a big part of the reason we got into this mess. Deregulation of financial industry starting with Reagan, Clinton, continuing with Dubbya at a higher rate.
Deregulation of the oil industry spearheaded by the lovely Dick Chenney is also what brought us the biggest ecological catastrophe in the history of humanity with the gulf oil spill.
You want more deregulation?

mart shu

May 8, 2011, 9:09 p.m.

Hi Lloyd,
the deficit an be reduced in the way you suggest by a miniscule amount but it will never be eliminated.

Technically if we are taxed 100% the budget still cannot be balanced. The only way to balance it is to eliminate defense spending. That is not going to happen though until the country totally goes to hell like all prior empires. We are following pattern of Roman, British and all other empires that crumbled.

Our debt to gdp ratio is in the 4/5:1 range rather than what John suggests. This is because our government employs the same sneaky accounting methods used by corporations. They don’t account for social security, medicare spending. We are in way worse shape than Greece.

Sidney Heath

May 8, 2011, 7:48 p.m.

Dear gentle writer
You already have your wish on mortgage interest.  It is limited to $1M for married couples.  If you have a home equity loan you could add an additional $100k but It has to be for acquisition costs not paying off credit cards etc.
You should also seriously consider your health and stop running around the world until your cast comes off.

Sid Heath

Charles Blankstein

May 8, 2011, 3:31 p.m.

Your analysis seems to treat all taxes as undifferentiated in effect.  I believe that lower taxes on lower income individuals and corporations have more favorable effects on overall economic performance than lower taxes on individuals (and corporprations all things otherwise equal).  The velocity of money is faster among lower income people and organizations because it must be expended more quickly.  The velocity of income among the wealthy is slower - and has a higher tendency to leak out to the benefit of other economies rather than stay here.  I invest and expend far more overseas now than when my income and wealth was lower.  That suggests to me that I contributed relatively far more to the American economy when I was younger than now. 

I would be interested to know whether and to what extent various tax structures aimed at encouraging expenditure and investment (or for that matter aimed directly at debt reduction) in the US might have.  If you answer at all, please do so seriously.  I do not find the oft repeated argument that all the rich people will run away and become Chinese persuasive.

Page 1 of 3  1 2 3 >