Thoughts from the Frontline

Time to Row, or Sail?

August 4, 2012

Choose your language

Note to readers: Due to internet connection problems from the Shadow Fed fishing camp in Maine, important information that John wanted to include in this week's letter did not get out in time for the original deadline, and so we are reposting the letter.

A few weeks ago, Ed Easterling and I updated the work we published almost ten years ago about secular bear and bull markets in chapters 5 and 6 of Bull's Eye Investing. This week I am in Maine at the annual Shadow Fed fishing trip (for those of us whose invitation to Jackson Hole keeps getting lost in the mail). Ed has graciously agreed to do another piece with me on the earnings, or business, cycle, which is different in timing than the secular stock market cycle but is part of the total warp and woof of the markets. When you combine them, you get a much clearer picture of the markets.

Earnings are a topic of great debate. At any given time, you can hear someone on TV talking about how "cheap" the market is, while the person on the next channel goes on about how expensive the market is. Today we look at the cycle of earnings, rather than a specific point in time. Let me give you a little preview. In terms of time, this earnings cycle is already longer than average, and in terms of magnitude it is projected to go to all-time highs. Which makes one want to think about whether current projections are realistic. So let's jump right in. (Note: This letter sets the Thoughts from the Frontline record for the number of charts, so it will print longer than usual, but the number of words is about average.)

But let me note that this week is the start of the 13th year of Thoughts from the Frontline. I started in August of 2000, talking about how the US would be in recession in 2001, analyzing the yield curve, which was beginning to seriously invert and which was also the signal for the recession call for 2007. I began with about 2,000 email addresses, gathered from readers of a previous print letter for another publisher and the readers of my first best-seller; and for whatever reason the list began to grow, and within a few years my entire business model changed, thanks to you, the readers and friends of this letter. The list has now grown to around 1 million of my closest friends and is posted on more websites than I ever imagined it would be. Who knew, 13 years ago, that this thing called the internet would be so cool? I am very grateful for your support.

I started Thoughts from the Frontline as a free service and hope to continue writing it for free for many years, as long are there are a few close friends who will still read my musings. My writing and thinking have evolved over the years, but I still sit down each Friday, wherever I am, and write about what I found interesting in all the reading I did the past week. I still find it exhilarating to hit the send button at the end of the process, every Friday night, and I relish the connection I feel with and the feedback I get from my readers.

And so, with an appreciative heart, here is this week's letter, as we kick off another year. And what a year it promises to be!

Time to Row, or Sail?

In April 2007, while forecasters predicted at least two more years of increases, the first "Beyond The Horizon" article stated:

"Earnings have increased at double-digit growth rates for five consecutive years – although many agree that earnings growth may be slowing, it's beyond almost everyone's foreseeable horizon that earnings might actually experience a decline."

By the end of 2007, earnings per share (EPS) for the…

Discuss This

21 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

Page 1 of 3  1 2 3 > 

Thomas Coyle

Aug. 10, 2012, 5:52 p.m.

Another outstanding article.  But like some other commenters I was struck by the increasing volatility, particularly since 1990.  I wonder what the charts would look like if you backed out earnings of financial services companies.  Mark-to-market accounting could add to the earnings volatility of this industry which has experienced rapid growth, particularly with the growth of “financial eingineering”/derivative trading.

Rob Farquharson

Aug. 7, 2012, 11:58 a.m.

I would appreciate your thoughts on the validity of comparing S&P500; earnings to US GDP over time given that the proportion of S&P 500 earnings from outside the US has increased dramatically over the past two decades?
Another approach to deriving normalized earnings is to use the long run ROE times the BVPS of the S&P500;. Over the past 60 years, S&P500; ROE has been flat with a central tendancy of 13.5%, with the current BVPS of 645 this would imply normalized trailing 12 month earnings of 87.07 which it strikes me is not too far below the current reported figures

patrick slattery

Aug. 6, 2012, 11:20 a.m.

Inflation led to hidden losses in he 1970s under conventional accounting rules.Phoney LIFO inventory profits were taxed,profits were also overstated and taxed excessively due to depreciation on historical costs instead of replacement costs, while real cash flow was reduced by the need for more money to finance inflated working capital. The latter was very negative for working capital intensive businesses.

joe butler

Aug. 6, 2012, 11:15 a.m.

What makes profits cycle? I realize it is a question and not a comment, but I do not know why in a group such as S& P 500 diverse as it is (or not) with different phases of growth/maturity of companies, different CEO s of various levels of ability all having roughly the same profit cycle.  Or is the S&P 500 group profit an indirect measure of Apple’s profit cycle (as suggested by another commenter).  Help an ignorant soul gain some illumination.  Thank you

Aurele Storno

Aug. 6, 2012, 3:06 a.m.

Thank you for this updated work with Cresmont, that I love to follow but only once or twice a year! It makes a full lot of sense and is clearly reflective of an average/aggregate behavior of the market/economy. However, I would be very interested to see the next level analysis that would compare and contrast the various up and downturns in therms of (1) leadership [who is leading the earning’s cycle? how strong is diffusion? how does it compare to previous cycles?] and (2) improvement composition/sources [is the cycle rather supported by growth? increased productivity? leverage? weak-USD export-friendly? anything else? how does it compares with previous cycles?]. Thanks again for the update and good luck to all for the next level analysis!

Stuart Owen

Aug. 5, 2012, 2:12 a.m.

I don’t think it changes the bigger picture of the likelihood of lower EPS, but I do wonder whether comparing S&P earnings to US GDP is the best measure of margins when c50% sales are in non US markets, I.e. earnings from outside the US are being added in and making profits seem high.

Edward Holl

Aug. 4, 2012, 5:35 p.m.

John,

I wonder if the statistical integrity of the data displayed, and subsequent conclusions drawn, might benefit from a rigorous analysis of the impact of two factors, both of which have accelerated dramatically in the last decade:

1) the percentage of US GDP relative to global GDP has materially declined, subjecting the US economy to factors not present in earlier periods
2) roughly 50%, and projected to go higher, of S&P earnings are generated from outside the US

Might it be the case that the elevated amplitude of the recent few years is a result of the staggering growth of China in the past five years? This is in evidence with the commodity and shipping cycles.

Might it be possible that US companies earnings derived from the better growing overseas economies has resulted in a “new normal” of higher earnings relative to US GDP?

Brgds,

b lepax

Aug. 4, 2012, 5:04 p.m.

Sorry to hear about Darrell Jr
For those in a similar situation, they may want to check out:

http://www.burzynskiclinic.com/

The Burzynski Clinic has been treating thousands of cancer patients from all over the world for over 40 years.
Brain cancer is the original focus
Big Pharma has tried to shut him down, steal his patients & put him in jail
Check out his research, the videos, testimonials, ....

George best

Aug. 4, 2012, 3:04 p.m.

john as a manager of my own IRA i only have one oar in the water.  i can scull with it or with a little help from you really row.  what would you suggest?  and could you please redefine the term absolute return?  thanks curious george best

patrick slattery

Aug. 4, 2012, 2:33 p.m.

Earnings in the 1970s were inflated by inflation effects that boosted phoney inventory profits and led to underestimation of fixed asset replacement costs in depreciation charges. Many companies reporting good profits then were actually losing money when accounting was adjusted to LIFO inventory and to depreciation based on those replacement costs. There were some offsetting gains from inflation in the devaluation of long term debt and gains in the value of real estate.

Since competition between labour and capital for a share of company revenues is a major determinant of profit margins,it would be interesting to analyse how unemployment keeps wage demands in check,to the benefit of profit margins.It would be difficult to separate the depressing effects of recessions on business sales resulting from reduced labour buying power in the economy from the depressing effects on labour costs that boosted margins.

Globalisation introduced intense competition in internationally traded goods that has been keeping labour costs in check. That is still a long term trend.

Page 1 of 3  1 2 3 >