Thoughts from the Frontline

Where Will the Jobs Come From?

March 17, 2012

Choose your language

"Six years into our global data collection effort, we may have already found the single most searing, clarifying, helpful, world-altering fact.

"What the whole world wants is a good job.

"This is one of the most important dsicoveries Gallup has ever made. At the very least, it needs to be considered in every policy, every law, every social initiative. All leaders – policy makers and lawmakers, presidents and prime ministers, parents, judges, priests, pastors, imams, teachers, managers and CEOs – need to consider it every day in everything they do.

"That is as simple and as straightforward an explanation of the data as I can give. Whether you and I were walking down the street in Khartoum, Cairo, Berlin, Lima, Los Angeles, Baghdad, or Istanbul, we would discover that the single most dominant thought on most people's minds is about having a job.

"Humans used to desire love, money, food, shelter, safety, peace and freedom more than anything else. The last 30 years have changed us. Now people want to have a good job. This changes everything for world leaders. Everything they do – from waging war to building societies – will need to be in the context of the need for a good job."

- From The Coming Jobs War, by Jim Clifton, Chairman and CEO of Gallup

Each month investors and politicians in countries all over the world obsess over the release of the monthly employment numbers. Even though these numbers are likely to be revised significantly from the original release, the markets can't help responding to the variations from the expected number. Why the focus on numbers that are likely to be proven wrong in the coming years? Because the single most important factor in the direction of an economy is employment. Consumer spending, personal income, tax revenue, corporate profits, and a host of other variables all swing on rising and falling employment.

This week we begin a series of letters on employment. I have been researching the topic more than usual for the book I am writing with Bill Dunkelberg (the Chief Economist of the National Federation of Independent Businesses) on the entire employment issue. We will look at why employment is so critical. How are jobs created and what policies can be adopted to help foster more jobs? Should the US try and keep jobs that are going overseas, or develop whole new industries? Who exactly is the competition globally for jobs?

We will find that billions of jobs will disappear in the coming decades and even more will be created. There are today some 1.2 billion good jobs, but 1.8 billion people want them. Over the next 30 years the world economy will double and then almost double again. Where will the new jobs be and who will get them? What should you and you children be doing today to be sure that you have jobs in the future?

In order to try to answer these questions, we will start with a general view of the employment situation in the US. What has it looked like in the past and where is it going? Today, we will look at the direction of employment in the US and then focus on both what employment is likely to be in the next few years as well as the dynamics of the labor market. There is a lot to cover. (This letter might print a little longer, as there will be lots of charts.)

Getting Back to Full Employment

The headline unemployment rate is 8.3%, down from 10% only a couple years ago. But ten years ago it was less than half that, and at the beginning of the last decade it was less than 4%. 60 years ago it was less than 3%! Employment is a very volatile number, and as we have seen, it can rise substantially before and during a recession. The first graph…

Discuss This

16 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

Page 2 of 2  < 1 2

Paul Erickson

March 17, 2012, 3:27 p.m.

John- I hope for your book you will look at the work of Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson in their new book about why nations succeed and fail. Too much power for big government and corporations to be extractive of wealth, and too little protection for small businesses and entrepreneurs to prosper will sink wealth creation:

http://www.economist.com/node/21549911

How do we create the politics and culture to limit the power of government and corporations and let individuals and small business prosper? And it is not just big government that is the problem- big business and big finance as well seek to “fix” the system for the benefit of their extractions.

Kelly Balthrop

March 17, 2012, 3:14 p.m.

John,

It is good to see you starting to focus on employment, and I look forward to your new book. As usual, even though we differ on political and philosophical issues, I find your research thorough and you are not afraid to call it as you see it; you are not afraid to tell people what they need to hear, instead of what they want to hear. I look forward to your next piece to see if you have come to some of the same conclusions that I have through my research for why we have weak employment, and what our short and long-term prospects are. I will not bait you with my ideas now, but look forward to a future debate.

Kelly Balthrop

K moore

March 17, 2012, 1:08 p.m.

These articles continue to skirt around the real problem with the economy.  The pervasive corruption within the Federal Government and the banking system.  The policy, laws and â??regulationsâ? are reflective of that corruption and until that is ultimately dealt with there will NEVER be a recovery and the only people making money will be those trading institutions â??in the knowâ?. But of course Mauldin canâ??t really talk about that now can he?  Bad for the investment â??businessâ?â?¦.which really says Maudlin is part of the problem.

Ski Milburn

March 17, 2012, 1:07 p.m.

This article, and the thoughtful responses to it reads more like the beginning of a long national conversation than a mere blog.

I agree with John that so much of the answer is local, but strongly disagree that a national solution is not absolutely necessary also.  Cities are where the rubber meets the road, but Washington is where the rules of the road are written, and they are so badly broken and the writers so totally dysfunctional that I grieve for the future.

I could go on and about national debt and a banking system that’s failing Main Street, or a national trade and industrial policy that is allergic to anything that helps workers but happy to do the bidding of the “job creators”, who aren’t creating much of anything right now.  How about discussing an entitlement system that has created a massive and unaffordable menu of entitlements for the bottom two-thirds of society, and an equally massive and unaffordable set for the very top, leaving what’s left of the middle class to carry both ends of the barbell and themselves too?  “The best government money can buy indeed!”

But instead, I’d like to expand on an idea that I’ve been thinking of for some time, and Vincent touched the edge of.  As productivity rises, and manufacturing automation increases, it takes less and less human labor (“jobs”) to produce what we need to live, but as wealth concentrates and the fruits of the ownership of the means of production does as well, fewer and fewer of the rewards “trickle down” to the people.  We can’t all make a decent living working in restaurants serving meals to each other.

In a well-functioning market economy, with reasonable distribution of the wealth and access to information, education, capital and markets, the underutilized entrepreneurial energy would unleash a torrent of valuable new ideas, business and wealth and sweep up the less talented in a flurry of job creation.  But we also see in the world a tipping point, where these systems break down into a kind of kleptocratic zero-sum game, where the wealthy capture big business and government in a bid to hang on for dear life, and everybody else lacks the buying power to support a functioning economy.

We have plenty of examples of economies that have never lifted themselves out of this condition, and a whole body of economics devoted to trying to devise strategies to escape this kind of economic “black hole”.  We’ve even seen economies fall backwards into this condition, and are working to figure out how to keep that from happening to us.  We might be seeing Greece enter the early stages of this devolution, and John’s “End Game” has plenty of warnings about the processes that might lead all of us down that rat hole.

The Western World hasn’t fallen off the cliff yet, but the trend lines are disturbing, and job creation is another “canary in the coal mine”.  Best we abandon the platitudes and get work figuring out an economic and political model that can avoid this fate.  I have very little confidence that the one we using now is likely to do so.

Joseph Moffa

March 17, 2012, 11:31 a.m.

John Mann,
You thoughts come right out of Charles Dickens propaganda. So the peasants were driven off the land? Read history again not from some guild writer that wanted to keep the status quo. The peasants were starving and they wanted to make sure that their offspring did not die. All those little kids working in factories in London were able to put food on the table and decrease the mortality rate. The population boomed after the start of the industrial revolution.
As for being able to determine what the plant and our resources can support is up to the indivdual people who use their brains and have an incentive to provide consumers with what they demand. You and Malthus are wrong and you will never get it.

John Mann

March 17, 2012, 10:12 a.m.

By “job” we probably mean a recognized positive role in society, that comes with a deserved share of resources to feed ourselves.  The idea of a “job” as a paid chore in some money-making enterprise is a much narrower concept than the former and is a feature of industrial capitalism.  It wasn’t this way before the industrial revolution (before peasants were driven off the land) and it cannot be once we’ve automated all or most of what in the 1950’s, say, was done by people.  And anyway we probably need to downscale our economic activity to a level that the planet and its resources can support.  So the real task is to figure out how to transition to “jobs” as I describe in my first sentence.

Page 2 of 2  < 1 2