Connecting the Dots

The Giant Presumption behind Re-Opening America

May 5, 2020

Newly “liberated” Americans are flocking to beaches, parks, and restaurants, eager to prove the novel coronavirus doesn’t scare them.

In fact, the virus doesn’t care how brave they are. It just wants to spread. I suspect it found many new hosts at those gatherings, and this will be apparent soon.

At the same time, many others are still staying home whenever possible, not yet convinced it is safe to go out. 

But regardless of who’s right, Wall Street people are thrilled. The stock market shot higher in April. Many experts think the economy will soon be back to normal.

What any of us think matters less than what the virus does. This “normal” everyone wants to see is an economy unmolested by this virus.

Will it just go away? Let’s see what experts think.


Photo: NIH

Three Scenarios

The economic outlook is cloudy right now because it isn’t entirely economic. It’s also medical and sociological. The economy’s course depends on how this virus behaves, and how people behave in response.

A report last week from the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) outlined three scenarios this pandemic could follow.

Scenario 1, which they call “Peaks and Valleys,” says this first wave will recede, but will be followed by similar waves every few months for the next year or two. Their severity will vary somewhat, but they will keep happening.

Economically, this is the middle-ground outlook. We’ll still have a recession, and the recurring outbreaks would delay recovery. After a lot of pain, people and businesses would adapt.

Scenario 2, the “Fall Peak,” says that what we just saw in March and April was the prelude to a larger wave this fall or winter. That’s what happened in the 1918 flu epidemic. Smaller third and fourth waves would probably follow in 2021.

That scenario could be an economic knock-out blow. Faced with a national breakdown of the healthcare system, authorities would likely impose far more severe and lengthy lockdowns than the US has seen so far. Businesses that were just getting back on their feet would close permanently. The government, having already spent trillions, might not be able to offer more stimulus.

Scenario 3, the “Slow Burn,” would see the virus keep spreading, but slowly enough for the healthcare system to handle. Further lockdowns would be unnecessary.

This is the economic best-case. It would mean the worst is behind us and the recovery will proceed. This is what many investors seem to be betting on.


Chart: University of Minnesota/CIDRAP

The CIDRAP team believes that in any of these scenarios, we should be prepared for at least another 18–24 months of significant COVID-19 activity. That’s how long it will take to either develop and deploy an effective vaccine, or for the population to develop “herd immunity.”

Wishful Thinking

With even the best-case scenarios looking dark, why are so many investors and businesspeople so sure the worst is over?

I think some of it is denial or “wishful thinking.” They don’t want it to be true and so convince themselves it is not. They expect to find a four-leaf clover that solves everything.

But I think the main problem is they don’t understand how hard this has hit the service part of the economy, and how difficult recovery will be.

Today’s investors love businesses that “scale.” A website like Facebook, for instance, can double its revenue without doubling expenses.

Not so for restaurants. One chef can’t make an infinite number of meals. And now, with different rules and customer expectations, they have to reengineer everything. It will take time and money. Meanwhile, unemployment will remain high and consumer spending will suffer.

And don’t forget, large events and conventions are probably off the table for months. The impact on the hotel, air travel, and entertainment industries alone would trigger a harsh recession.

But that’s not the scariest part.


Photo: Pixabay

Feeling Lucky?

If governors keep relaxing the restrictions this month, most of the US will have spent six to eight weeks offline or in some kind of lockdown situation.

That seems like a long time. But Wuhan, China, where the outbreak originated, had to stay in a far more restrictive lockdown for 10 weeks. Ditto for hard-hit parts of Italy and Spain.

In the US, new cases seem to have stabilized to around 30,000 daily. The number is not shrinking nationally. It’s not shrinking in places like Georgia and Texas that are beginning to re-open. As more people resume contact in public spaces, even more infections seem likely.

It is true that lockdowns can’t go on indefinitely. People have limits. The isolation causes other problems and even deaths. But, as I explained last week, the economy isn’t going to bounce right back. This urgency to re-open businesses before customers are ready is odd.

Our leaders seem to presume the virus will behave differently in the US than it did elsewhere, and we don’t need to do what other countries did.

If that presumption proves false, then the “Fall Peak” scenario is a real possibility.

In March and April, millions of Americans lost their jobs and 63,856 lost their lives. It’s been awful. And it may have been a dress rehearsal for worse in November/December.

See you at the top,

Patrick Watson
@PatrickW

Discuss This

0 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

Bruce Sansom 25518

May 11, 12:05 p.m.

Opening up at this time doesn’t seem very intelligent. The spread began with a handful of infected people and it spread like wildfire. At this point, we have thousands infected and probably more thousands not showing symptoms. How can it possibly be safe. I suspect by mid-July we may be facing a calamity.

timothysilvers@gmail.com

May 5, 2:39 p.m.

Patrick, I agree investors are overly optimistic. Regarding this statement “This urgency to re-open businesses before customers are ready is odd.”, I’m not sure it’s that odd. America has a strong culture of individual liberty. I think that people want the ability to chose. Even if the end result is similar (too few customers and business going under), business owners and customers will feel better if they believe that individuals are deciding not to frequent a business, rather than government mandates that people can’t patronize a business. Cheers, Tim Silvers