Connecting the Dots

Will America Accept the Worst?

July 21, 2020

Even in normal times, the news describes murders, accidents, wars, natural disasters, and the passing of once-famous celebrities.

Those deaths are usually just headlines. We don’t know the people, and we don’t expect to share their fate anytime soon. We note them and move on.

Ignoring the death news isn’t so easy in a pandemic that could sicken and possibly kill any of us, at any time. Yet people manage to do it. Some think it’s all exaggerated or fake. But even those who see the threat often tune out the news. They’d rather not think about it—and understandably so.

The virus doesn’t care what people think. It will, if given opportunity, try to infect them. A small percentage of those infected will die. Will others care?

Sadly, I think many won’t. Millions of us have been ignoring needless death for years.

Photo: Wikimedia

Revised Possibilities

When the COVID-19 case count turned higher in mid-June, President Trump and others said not to worry. It was the result of more testing, and deaths were still falling.

Neither of those proved right. New cases rose faster than testing, and people take a few weeks to die. And sure enough, the daily death totals turned higher in early July.

Now, the percentage of patients who die is indeed falling as doctors learn how to treat the condition. But with many more cases now, we are still going to see a lot more death this summer. Then we get to fall and flu season, which could be even worse. 

Two months ago in The Great Reopening Gamble, I described the four possible scenarios we face, based on the answer to two questions.

  • Will the virus recede?
  • Will the economy improve?

I said back then we would know more in a few weeks, and we do. Instead of receding, the virus is spreading faster. That eliminates two of the four scenarios. Here’s where we are now.

Scientists are working on vaccines and better treatments, so maybe things will get better. But any such breakthroughs are probably months away, and maybe longer.

What does that mean economically? It depends on how people react.

So far, most governors don’t seem likely to reimpose the kind of stay-at-home orders we saw last spring. So some folks will go about their business (hopefully wearing masks), making the economic damage relatively less severe.

But their behavior could also intensify the problem. Even a few carriers can spread the virus enough to offset any economic boost they create.

Somewhere in there is a tipping point, and the deciding factor is how much death will Americans accept?

The answer, I’m afraid, is “a lot of it.”

Worst Choices

Almost from the start, some have framed this crisis as a polar struggle between protecting public health vs. protecting the economy.

I think that’s a false choice. The economy can’t thrive until we control the virus. But surely no one wants to lose both those battles, harming our health and our economy at the same time. 

Don’t be so sure.

Here is a chart I shared last September, comparing US healthcare costs with other countries. These are 2018 numbers but probably still close.

Source: Forbes

You can see we spend far more per person on healthcare than other countries. It’s not even close.

Even before the pandemic, this money wasn’t making us any healthier. Here are the top 10 countries ranked by life expectancy, according to the latest United Nations data.

Chart: Worldometers

You don’t see the US because it is way down the list at #46. On average, our lives are shorter than people in advanced economies like Japan, Switzerland, and Australia. We are also behind less-advanced countries like Cyprus, Maldives, and Lebanon.

The average American lives almost five years less than the average Italian even though we spend three times as much on healthcare, per capita. Multiply those five years by 330 million Americans, and we’re losing a lot more life-years than other countries, and it’s not even saving us any money.

In other words, the US was letting people die prematurely, and hurting our economy in the process, long before COVID-19 came along.

That’s a choice, not an accident. The solutions are well known. We could save those lives if we wanted to. We don’t because many Americans have other priorities.

So if the pandemic death toll worsens, as seems likely, I would not assume that the public will do what is necessary to stop it. Some will, yes, but not all.

That means we will continue diverting economic resources to unproductive uses and our economy will have a hard time recovering, much less growing.

Meanwhile, other countries (like China) that have handled the virus better will move ahead without us.

That is why I said The Corona Depression Is Here. I hope to be wrong. But I don’t think I am.

See you at the top,

Patrick Watson

Discuss This


We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.


George Gilder

Sep. 5, 8:59 a.m.

I can’t believe that a brilliant man like you are lockbrained by the viral new mania and its sickening masquerade. Until you get it straight you should stop presuming to advise anyone on investments. You are egregiously wrong about the coronavirus threat, which has hardly increased the all-cause death rate. The average trumped up COVID death in Massachusetts comes at age 85, older than the average death. I’m 80 years old and this has been one of the safest years of my lifetime. But the lockdowns and ignominious masks are destroying the world economy. Why are you nodding like nincompoops at the most costly policy blunder in world history?

July 27, 12:59 p.m. 2.8 million deaths annually in the US.  No media uproar, no masks even, no regulations from FDA to prohibit diabetes inducing food consumption.  No economic havoc.  Masks minus social distancing and business as usual with the caveat to avoid large crowds and close, intimate behavior with a number of others would suffice all needs.  The number of deaths from Covid-19, over counted or not, is near insubstantial on the mortality dial.  And when it’s over, cancer and heart disease will continue for years and years killing half the total above. Death of loved ones is always tragic, but never worth destroying the economy over, an action in the name of ‘lives’ which destroys more people’s lives than it will ever save.

July 27, 12:51 p.m.

Every death is tragic, and especially to those related to the deceased.  The Media, including this part of it, this article, far, far exaggerated the death numbers, right or wrong, over counted, skewed, whatever, that are given by the authorities.  According to CDC, 1.28 MILLION Americans die of either cancer or heart disease every year. EVERY YEAR. The next six leading causes of death fill in with 860,000 deaths.  Old age,i.e., everyone dies, abortion, infant mortality, and miscellaneous are not actually listed.  The final ANNUAL, every year, mortality number is 2,800,000, rounded.  Where’s the media cry to shut down, i.e., destroy, the economy based on any of these numbers?  The death numbers for Covid-19 are a pittance by comparison.  No denial here, no minimization based on opinion, simply on cold numbers.  Your entire perspective is illogical.  Masks plus business as normal will not decimate the economy.  Closing down businesses and services due to mandated social distancing and panic over new cases will.  It’s quite simple, really.  In 1918 with a population less than 1/3 of today’s, it is argued that 500,000 died over 2 years or so in a time with little or no medical technology.  2 years later, what else happened?  The Roaring 20’s.  Lots of problems there, but humans always make cultural mistakes.  But business thrived until the ‘29, and revived after the war (which was the foundation for the technical revolution we live in today).  Microscope on the markets, yes.  Otherwise take a 30,000 foot view, calm down, and be part of the solution.

Brian Gilstrap

July 25, 12:12 p.m.

I wish I thought you were wrong.