top of page

Economic Desiderata

And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should. Therefore, be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be.

Is 29,000 Jobs Enough?

What Will the Fed Do?

The State of the Economy

It’s Not Just Data Centers Powering the Growth

The Changing Nature of Warfare

Free Health and Longevity Symposium

Cleveland, Washington DC, Birthdays and Hearing Aids


And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should. Therefore, be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be. And whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life, keep peace in your soul. With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be cheerful. Strive to be happy.

 

-          Desiderata by Max Ehrmann ©1927

 

There is a wonderful poem called Desiderata, that I’m sure we have all read many times, by Max Ehrmann. It is a compilation of seemingly random thoughts that are wisdom about living life. No real connection between these thoughts, other than when viewed in its entirety, it is a fabulous way to look at life and the world.

 

Each week I read hundreds of “desiderata” about finance and economics and the world, perhaps interesting in their own right, but when taken together offer a far more complete picture than focusing on one point. It is easy to find problems, as there are many, but focusing on them to the exclusion of the positive is more than just counterproductive. It drains the soul.

 

Maybe it’s just my impression, but the mainstream media has become more focused on writing about the negative over the years. This is because negative headlines and stories produce more engagement and clicks, thus more revenue. It also produces an overall negative mood in the country, as we can see from numerous surveys. Stories about the marvels of free markets and capitalism in providing the greatest lifestyle in the history of the world, just don’t have the same “mental grab.” “If it bleeds it leads,” was the mantra of most editors in the newspaper era. In the social media world of today? It dominates. Much of that concern is justifiable, but it is not the entire picture.

 

Today, we’re going to look at a lot of various data points and analysis, that when taken together give us a much clearer picture of the total world.

 

Is 29,000 Jobs Enough?


“Payrolls were softer than expected, rising 29k in September and below the estimate of 90k. The prior two months were revised down by a total of 60k. Of this, private sector jobs grew by 46k vs 89k in the month before (down from the initial print of 127k) with a drop in government.

 

“The household survey reflected strong job growth, though this is a very volatile monthly number, rising by 406k but because it didn’t keep up with the rise in the labor force of 485k, the unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2% from 4.1%.

 

“Smoothing out the monthly volatility, the 3-month job gain average is 51k vs the 6-month average of 66k and the 12-month average of 41k. For perspective, in 2019 the monthly job gains were 165k.

 

“Bottom line, the debate continues as to what the monthly job gains are needed in order to satisfy the increases in the labor force which we know have slowed. I’ve seen estimates everywhere from zero to north of 50k so the 3-month average is kind of in the range.” (H/T Peter Boockvar)

 

Torsten Slok of Apollo notes that breakeven job growth has collapsed from 200,000 per month to close to zero today, driven by a sharp drop in immigration shrinking labor force growth and continued baby boomer retirements pulling down participation. The graph below shows how much things have changed among economic observers in just the last two years. These are estimates of what the breakeven job growth would be to keep the unemployment rate steady. These estimates are from the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve Banks of St. Louis and Dallas and the Brookings Institute. Two years ago, the average breakeven estimate among these four was roughly 190,000 jobs. That’s a tall order. Today it is 25,000 jobs, and the 29,000 jobs print, which historically seems quite weak, is in line with a steady unemployment rate. Which is exactly what we got.

 

This is mostly a function of immigration reducing the labor force and baby boomers retiring in ever greater numbers. Eventually (as in a year or two) the immigration overhang gets worked out. And then I would expect the breakeven number to increase. But back to 200,000 new jobs every month? I am not sure that’s in the cards.

 

29,000 jobs is not a lot. Is it enough? Let’s see what the numbers look like for the rest of the year.

 

The good news buried in this report? Unemployment remains low. That’s not to say that everybody has a job that they would like, at the pay they want. Three of my kids are looking for jobs, so I hear how hard it is to find them.

 

What Will the Fed Do?

 

We have now had three FOMC members basically saying this week that there is no urgency in raising rates, the implication being no rate hike in October. This unemployment data coupled with improving PCE inflation numbers gives Warsh the space not to raise rates six days prior to an election, something I have maintained that would be politically problematic. No harm in waiting till December.

 

The State of the Economy

 

Let’s look at the data on the general economy. One of my favorite sources is Philippa Dunne and Doug Henwood writing in the TLR Analytics. Philippa has given me permission to use these charts from their report this week.

 

First, with the exception of the government, every sector of the economy is reducing their debt: financial corporations, households, nonfinancial corporations and even state and local governments. Household debt is down to where it was in 1998.

 

Source: TLRanalytics
Source: TLRanalytics

Nonfederal financial debt (not including banks and financial institutions) has dropped from a high of 200% of GDP to below 160%. Part of that is the growth in GDP, but most of it is actually paying down and reducing debt. This will be important if we have the financial crisis I am predicting as debt is always a problem in financial crises. So the less you have to begin with the better off you are. Whether it is corporations or personal.

 

Source: TLRanalytics
Source: TLRanalytics

Household balance sheets are continuing to improve. Stocks and bonds and mutual funds are the source of much of the growth. Note that in the chart below that mortgage liabilities are dropping, and when you take out student debt, consumer credit is modestly lower. And that’s with a larger adult population. Net worth is increasing. Of course, that net worth is increasingly skewed to the top half and quarter and 10% and 1% of the population. In some cases heavily so.

 

Source: TLRanalytics
Source: TLRanalytics

And nonfinancial corporations are having an incredible run. Profitability in terms of percentage was in the 60s before tax, but after tax we are at an all-time high. The corporate tax rate is 22%, and this last quarter there was an effective tax rate of 22.1%.

 

Source: TLRanalytics
Source: TLRanalytics

I should point out that even with a 22% corporate tax rate, the high profits of US corporations from total tax revenues from corporations have increased dramatically since the rates were cut. We are close to an all-time high that we saw only a few quarters ago.


I find TLR Analytics to be one of the best sources of analysis on government data and general social trends that I know of. The newsletter is targeted to institutions, as it is pricey. That being said, if you would like a trial subscription, drop a note to Philippa Dunne at philippa@panix.com.

 

It’s Not Just Data Centers Powering the Growth

 

We are all aware of how much construction spending on data centers is boosting the economy. The growth of construction spending is up 823% since 2021, to roughly $85 billion a year currently. And that does not include the servers and racks, the electronic equipment, connection with servers to the Internet, power supplies, etc. All of that spending is driving a significant portion of the growth in GDP.

 

Source: Wolf Street
Source: Wolf Street

And the spending on power plants to power these data centers is monstrous as well, growing to an annualized $186 billion a year currently. All of which creates demand on the construction labor pool.

 

Source: Wolf Street
Source: Wolf Street

But the construction story is not just data centers and power plants. What almost no one talks about is the relatively large growth in factory construction. Here’s Wolf Richter:

 

“Factory construction spending growth – “growth,” not actual spending – has taken a backseat to the mania of data centers; “actual spending” on factory construction ($168 billion annual rate) is still nearly double the spending on data centers ($85 billion annual rate).

 

Spending on factory construction at an annual rate of $168 billion in August was unchanged from July, and down by 19.8% year-over-year.

 

But it was still 126% higher than what it had averaged over the six-year period 2015-2020.”

 

Source: Wolf Street
Source: Wolf Street

This coupled with a constantly reduced level of immigration labor, as you might imagine, is creating havoc in the construction world. Data centers are skewing the cost, as they will simply pay whatever they have to pay in order to get the experienced labor they need. Material prices are up more than 50% since 2021. The Producer Price Index for construction spiked 10% this last year.

 

Anecdotally, in talking with those involved in the construction world, the common complaint is finding workers at a price that is affordable. At some point, I think we are going to have to rethink our entire immigration process. I get that these immigrants have come to the country illegally. And we need to control our borders and be more selective in who we let in. That being said, with boomers retiring, we are simply going to need more workers, and we are not producing them organically (the old-fashioned way) in the quantities we need.

 

But at some point, when we finally do make the commonsense immigration reforms that are needed, we are going to have to contemplate people who are in the country and are working and contributing to be allowed to stay. It’s an emotionally charged subject, but economics and the need for workers will eventually come front and center to the conversation. Basically, GDP growth comes down to the number of workers times productivity. While technology is having a productivity moment, we’re going to have to focus on the number of workers problem sooner rather than later.

 

(This conversation could take an entire letter or two. There will be no consensus that doesn’t require compromise from the various parties involved in the negotiations.)

 

The Changing Nature of Warfare

 

Jim Brooks is a well-regarded geopolitical analyst and commentator on military affairs. He recently wrote about the massive changes going on in Ukraine and Russia. I am picking selected quotes from his article.

 

(For fun, here is the AI-generated image for that article.)

 

“Offering a glimpse of the future of warfare, the IT leader who gave Ukraine its ‘Army of Drones’ in 2022 now plans to build Ukraine’s ‘Army of Robots.’

 

“Technological warfare does not stand still. We need the next breakthrough,” Mikhaylo Fedorov posts about his new project. “Our bet is on the robotization of warfare.  The mission of the Army of Robots is to save lives.”

 

Mr. Fedorov has a track record. Last February, as Ukraine’s Defense Minister, he persuaded Elon Musk to cut off Russian use of Starlink. This month, he persuaded American tech billionaire Alex Karp to become the first investor in his new defense technology company.

 

Setting markers, Mr. Fedorov told tech leaders at a conference in Lviv last weekend that his goal is for a humanoid robot to kill the first Russian soldier in six months. He set a one-year deadline for the first robot assault on an enemy position with no infantry involved. 

 

“Make robots fight instead of people,” he said.... “Robots should do the most dangerous work so our service members can come home.”

 

Robots are changing the way wars are being fought. Drones obviously. Russia and Ukraine just had their first “sea battle” between naval ship drones (Ukraine won). Helicopters are no longer needed for medevac as drones drive to the injured party and bring them to hospitals.

 

“On the battlefield, Ukraine’s tech advances are making some military specialties go the way of the horse-mounted cavalry. From this 4.5-year long war, Ukrainian snipers account for three of the five longest confirmed kills in the world. But now, Ukrainian snipers are shifting into drone work. A 2.5-mile shot can’t compete with an all-seeing drone roaming over miles of front lines. Ukrainian officers estimate that the life span of a Russian soldier who ventures into the 30-mile wide ‘kill zone’ is 20 to 30 minutes.”

 

Drones are now doing the incredibly dangerous work of clearing out landmines, which stopped the 2023 Ukrainian offensive in its tracks. 50,000 drone missions were carried out by the first half of this year.

 

Russia and Putin are not sitting still. “President Putin’s response is to throw money as well as men at the problem. Russian government spending on the military is to jump by 27 percent, to $203 billion next year, Reuters reports, citing Russian budget documents.  Next year, Russia plans to spend $12 billion on production of jet-powered drones and loitering munitions, President Zelensky said Saturday in his nightly address to the nation. “In September, the Russians launched more than 2,730 jet-powered “shaheds,” he added, referring to a Russian version of an Iranian design.”

 

Like much military technology, this will have implications for commercial robots. Elon Musk’s and others’ vision of the world on millions of personal humanoid robots is being pushed into reality by what is happening in Ukraine and Russia. US manufacturers are learning and working in tandem with Ukrainian forces. Trump has just launched an initiative in the military to produce more modern tools for our military.

 

On the problem side, housing construction is in the doldrums. Mortgage rates are at recent highs. That being said, almost 50% of current mortgages are below 4%. Just slightly under 20% of mortgages are under 3%! Makes it hard to want to move or sell. Income and wealth distribution is still way too high.

 

Energy prices and especially diesel availability is an issue. The growing acceptance of socialism among frustrated young people is problematic.

 

But on balance? The world is progressing and things are getting better, if not always in a straight-line fashion. We need to recognize that the world is not coming to an end, it’s just changing very rapidly.

 

Free Health and Longevity Symposium

 

Economics and finance are important. But I think we would all agree that health is paramount. That is one of the reasons I’ve been so focused on cutting edge health and longevity technology. It is making a difference in all of our lives. As you know, I, along with Dr. Mike Roizen have launched a longevity company, Lifespan Edge. We are now (or soon will be) in six locations around the country.

 

I can’t tell you how much incredible information we get every week. Mike’s personal newsletter, which we distribute to those who have come to our website, is simply full of amazing new breakthroughs.

 

We have decided to offer a free online Health and Longevity Symposium on Saturday, October 24. The speaker lineup is simply outstanding. Mike travels all over the world speaking at various health and longevity conferences, and he hears the best experts in the world. He is entirely responsible for choosing the lineup of speakers we will be hosting.

 

The topics will cover a wide range, from brain health, the latest breakthroughs in technology, that Parkinson’s cure that I’ve been writing about, peptides, stem cells and more. Like the SIC, you will be able to watch it either live or at your leisure. We will of course transcribe it into written form and make it available as audio podcasts. We are planning on roughly 12 cutting-edge presentations, each focused on their specialty for 30 minutes.

 

You can sign up at Lifespan Edge Symposium. At the website, you can see who the speakers are and their topics. It will be a zoom conference with the ability for you to send your questions to the speakers. We are structuring this to be practical advice that you can adapt to your own needs, from the simple question of “what vitamins should I take?” to an explanation of the powerful growing role of peptides and stem cells, and what it means for you. We will be talking to the doctors who are writing the legislation to allow stem cell therapies to be tried in various states. These are the experts on the cutting edge, specifically chosen by Mike for their expertise.

 

The biotechnology world is changing so fast, and we want to help you keep up. We all want to not only live longer, but to increase our healthspans.  As Mike will explain, there are 14 technologies that will be needed in order to reverse aging. Two are available now and others are in human trials, with more breakthroughs on the immediate horizon. Mike thinks there is an 80% chance that by 2035 we will be reversing aging. Your mission, should you choose to accept, is to make sure that you live to 2035 and know where and how to access these new technologies.

 

We are here to help. Simply click on the link, sign up and we will make sure you get your free pass. I really want all my readers to do this, because I want to be writing to you in 2035. Don’t procrastinate. Sign up now.

 

Cleveland, Washington DC, Birthdays and Hearing Aids

 

I will celebrate my 77th birthday on Sunday at a quiet dinner with a few friends. Bigger celebrations are now every five years, rather than every year. Next week I will go to Cleveland to be with Mike and Nancy Roizen as they celebrate their 80th birthday together. Then I will undergo some laser surgery on my eyes while I am there.

 

Friends know that I have been hard of hearing for quite some time. My hearing aids have been less effective. They finally broke and so I went to the top-rated audiologist in Puerto Rico. I brought my old Phonak hearing aids. My research suggests that the top-of-the-line Phonak devices will be my best bet for my new ones. The audiologist said that she can fix my old ones. I wanted the new ones because they can tune them to your specific hearing issues. It turns out, that the technology in my 10-year-old Phonak hearing aids allows them to tune them to my hearing issues as well. As a courtesy, she did that for me at the end of our testing session.

 

I had no idea what I was missing. Night and day. I can actually hear what’s going on around me. Over the last few years, frustratingly sitting at dinners and on zoom calls I was missing every fourth sentence or word. Hard to keep up and it makes you look like you’re losing it. Further, they now have a technology that in theory will cure to some extent my rather severe tinnitus. After a week, it has made a difference but let’s see what the new hearing aids will do. I will report back to you.

 

Not exactly cutting-edge longevity technology, but it sure will make my life better.

 

And with that, I will hit the send button. You have a great week.

 

Your watching my life get better analyst,

signature.png

John Mauldin

​

P.S. If you like my letters, you'll love reading Over My Shoulder with serious economic analysis from my global network, at a surprisingly affordable price. Click here to learn more.

Read important disclosures here.
YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES.

Did someone forward this article to you?

Click here to get Thoughts from the Frontline in your inbox every Saturday.

Put Mauldin Economics to work in your portfolio. Your financial journey is unique, and so are your needs. That's why we suggest the following options to suit your preferences:

​

  • John’s curated thoughts: John Mauldin and editor Patrick Watson share the best research notes and reports of the week, along with a summary of key takeaways. In a world awash with information, John and Patrick help you find the most important insights of the week, from our network of economists and analysts. Read by over 7,500 members. See the full details here.
     

  • Invest in longevity: Transformative Age delivers proven ways to extend your healthy lifespan, and helps you invest in the world’s most cutting-edge health and biotech companies. See more here.
     

  • Macro investing: Our flagship investment research service is led by Mauldin Economics partner Ed D’Agostino. His thematic approach to investing gives you a portfolio that will benefit from the economy’s most exciting trends—before they are well known. Go here to learn more about Macro Advantage.

Thoughts from the Frontline

Recent Articles

Economic Desiderata

October 2, 2026

Reversing Financial Repression

September 25, 2026

Fed Policy: As Good As It Gets

September 18, 2026

Inflation Doesn’t Cooperate

September 11, 2026

Revisiting Muddle Through

September 4, 2026

In Your Backyard: Jobs, Growth, and the Race We're Actually In

August 28, 2026

Comments (25)

Evie
15m ago

Health care costs are a. Big problem in today's economy. None want to address the price gouging insurance companies. Medical for all is a joke as medicare is not free and very unaffordable. Maybe that is why many are so unhappy!

Like

John Price
17m ago

Excellent article! You included a lot of very interesting charts , but I had difficulty reading them. It could be that I was reading your article with my IPad. I’m an engineer and am not familiar with some of the economic terms used. I have been read your weekly articles for at least 18 years, so you would think I should be fully acquainted with the terminology that you use. As an 86 year old, my memory is not what it used to be to be. However, I still enjoy every article that you produce. Thanks !

Like

Bonnie
30m ago

Happy Birthday, John. May you be blessed with many more healthy happy birthdays! And thank you for all the good things you do.

Like

Regarding the Fed FOMC, it is interesting that the tough-talking "Hawks" who want to raise rates in October, two weeks before the election, were easy-money Doves under the Joe Biden admin. Austin Goolsbee is a good example. Nothing but politics on the Fed board and it is skewed Left.

Like
Bonnie
33m ago
Replying to

True. But I own a lot of T-bills from Treasury Direct and so keep a very close eye on short term interest rates, especially the 3 month bills which the FED seems to adhere closely to. Short term rates were rising faster than the FED rates so they pretty much had to raise rates to keep up with the market.

Like

Don Wilson
45m ago

John:

Happy birthday and may you have many more! I have been reading you since the very beginning, my how time fly's!

Like

John Dunham
55m ago

Really something for tintinitis? Please dont keep that to yourself!!

Like
Bernard Blanchette
12m ago
Replying to

Yes, I second the sharing of the tintinitis cure as my audiologist said there is not much that can be done.

Edited
Like

"is in line with a steady unemployment rate. Which is exactly what we got." That implies that unemployment is quite high and stuck there. That is not at all true. Unemployment is near all time lows at 4.2%, below what used to be considered "full employment" at 5%, which might be closer to 4% today. The fact there are not big employment increases on a monthly basis, is precisely because the country is near full employment. One would expect new employment to decrease as this point is approached. In addition, AI (or SI if you wish) is generating productivity increases that decreases the requirement for additional labor. All in all, employment is a neutral indicator on today's economy: not too hot and certainly, not too cold

Like

Harold
2h ago

John, great article as always. Happy Birthday and any more. I’m just 5 years behind you and sometimes view you as my “canary in the coal mine.” Please keep us appraised on your hearing issue and solution - I’m close behind you ! Maybe Patrick Cox has a solution for us.

Like

Happy birthday John. You have been a part of my life for 24 years now through your weekly letter, books, and other subscriptions.

Like

So in the new world of warfare, countries will build robots and drones to destroy the robots and drones built by other countries. This certainly may reduce the loss of human life (at least directly), but it seems like it would reduce one of the primary incentives to avoid war.

Would that not result in countries spending a larger portion of their limited resources for destructive rather than constructive purposes? Then the people will suffer economically. I just don’t see how making wars easier to carry out as a positive.

Like
Gavin Longmuir
1h ago
Replying to

Take the next step, Mr. McMorris. Assume that "Ukrainian" tech (we all know where it really comes from) succeeds in destroying all the Russian robots on the other side of the line. Then what happens?


Should we expect that human Russians will then give up in the face of superior "Ukrainian" technology? Or should we assume that the Russians will keep on fighting, and the "Ukrainian" robots will then have to start killing actual humans -- men, women, children?


Robot warfare is inevitable, but it will not stop war and the killing of human beings. And ask yourself -- how many imported Chinese components and how much imported Russian exotic metals are in those killer drones ... whether they are "Ukrainian" or openly made in Europe or the US?

Like

Replying to

So, Gavin, you think anyone in America is going to change what the Ukrainians are doing for their own survival? You ask good questions that have no answers. You imply that someone has given Ukraine this technology. Why? Ukraine, the industrial hub of the USSR, was always a central source of military know-how and educated technologists. They are building all this themselves, of course importing Chinese motors through black markets. The Russians, who are reportedly losing 1000 men per day (drones on humans is already a reality there) which is on pace with twice the rate of American losses in WW2, will respond with their own technology. Putin has threatened to respond with nukes. Everyone and their brother has tried to stop these two countries from destroying each other. Putin is painted in a corner and cannot stop the war without being executed by his own people, to whom he made empty promises of rebuilding the USSR and instead has destroyed Russia, which has now been attacked in central Moscow for the first time since Napoleon in 1812. This was to be a 5 day war. Putin will fight to the end and will kill as many Russians, Ukrainians and even North Koreans, as he needs to before he himself is executed

Edited
Like
tftf-modal-img.jpg

Thoughts from the Frontline

Follow John Mauldin as he uncovers the truth behind, and beyond, the financial headlines. This in-depth weekly dispatch helps you understand what's happening in the economy and navigate the markets with confidence.

Let the master guide you through this new decade of living dangerously

John Mauldin's Thoughts from the Frontline

Free in your inbox every Saturday

​ 

​ 

By opting in you are also consenting to receive Mauldin Economics' marketing emails. You can opt-out from these at any time. Privacy Policy

bottom of page