
Revisiting Muddle Through
It’s Labor Day weekend, and my goal with this letter will be to not interrupt your long weekend too much. But there are some things that are happening that are important. My basic thesis for quite some time has been that we are in a Muddle Through Economy, which I’ve always meant that to me the GDP will grow slightly south of 2% over time. For 25 years, that has been the case. Is it time to revisit the Muddle Through world? Let’s look at some of the data and try to get a feel for what the next few months and even quarters looks like.
A Few Thoughts on Interest Rates
New York, DC, The Cleveland Clinic and More
It’s Labor Day weekend, and my goal with this letter will be to not interrupt your long weekend too much. But there are some things that are happening that are important. My basic thesis for quite some time has been that we are in a Muddle Through Economy, which I’ve always meant that to me the GDP will grow slightly south of 2% over time. For 25 years, that has been the case. Is it time to revisit the Muddle Through world? Let’s look at some of the data and try to get a feel for what the next few months and even quarters looks like.
A Solid Labor Report*
On its face, the BLS labor report today was quite solid. There are a few minor caveats that should be noted, but overall this was the best report we’ve seen in some time.
Quoting from Barry Habib at MBS Highway (source Morning Update) from his morning update:
“The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released its August jobs report, showing 162,000 jobs were created, well above estimates of 58,000. Adding to the strong report were positive revisions to the previous two months totaling 55,000. Notably, July was revised from a negative -23,000 20 positive +21,000, accounting for most of the revision.
“While today’s BLS report was strong across the board, it does not jive with the other labor market reports from ADP and Revelio. BLS includes government, so in order to compare apples to apples, we have to look at the BS private payroll figure, which was +127,000. That compares with +38,080 p.m. post 37,000 in Revelio - clearly some big disparities.
“Additionally, the BLS said there were 74,000 jobs created from the birth/death model, which tries to capture small business job growth that compares with zero job growth in small businesses in ADP.”
While most of the press and markets focus on the establishment survey, there were things in the household survey that were outstanding. From my friend Steve Moore:
"But the big number that jumps off the page is the return of the American worker. After many months of troubling declines in the workforce (one million missing workers) from the peak last year, in August we saw a complete reversal. According to the household survey, 683,000 more workers entered the workforce and 569,000 of them found jobs and started earning a paycheck. The labor force participation rate rose. Data center construction is one of the major drivers of new employment."

This is a most welcome outcome. And with unemployment at only 4.1%, that bodes well. At some point we will get some serious analysis of how the large influx of illegal immigrants messed with the jobs numbers and now with both government and self-deportations, the number of workers in the US is dropping and it’s clearly, at least for this past month, finally showing up in the participation rate. That participation rate has been making a lot of us very concerned.
Beige Book Blahs
Peter Boockvar does an outstanding job of summarizing the Federal Reserve Beige Book, which is a look at the business climate in the 12 Federal Reserve districts. There were some good parts, but a lot of it was just “blah.” Kind of a perfect description of Muddle Through. First some good parts:
“While we know data center CapEx is massive, the upper income spender is robustly spending and the US government is flowing $2 trillion of more money into the economy than it’s taking in via taxes,” this is the flipside:
“…the net economic result still seems around 1.5-2% (of GDP) when listening to the Fed’s Beige Book describe it: “Economic activity increased modestly since early July. Ten of the twelve Federal Reserve Districts reported growth in the slight to moderate range; two Districts reported no change. The labor market sounded blah, “Employment rose very slightly overall, with three Districts showing modest gains in employment, four reporting slight gains, and five Districts experiencing no change.”
That’s the overall economic climate in the US. But then when you listen to or read the corporate earnings reports, it seems like a different world. One company after another is simply blowing their earnings out. The stock market is within a hair of its all-time highs as I write this morning. Yes, you can find sectors within the market that are struggling. But overall, investors shouldn’t have much to complain about.
I pay a lot of attention to the funding of pension funds. I have written about underfunded pension funds in the past with some degree of concern. The data I’m looking at now (with some stupid state decision-making exceptions) shows that a rising market has cured a lot of those under-funded problems.
The Bullish Argument
For quite some time, we’ve been able to go to Dr. Ed Yardeni for the bullish argument on stocks and the economy. He wrote last night:
“Earnings are strong because the economy is booming. The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow model is projecting real GDP growth of 4.7% (saar) in Q3 (chart). Consumer spending is expected to rise 3.8%, while AI-driven business investment remains strong, with equipment spending projected to increase 18.3% and intellectual property investment 6.8%. Final sales to private domestic purchasers are running at 4.6%.”

Ed mentioned the Atlanta Fed GDPNow, which gets revised almost once a week as new data comes in. Notice the difference between the blue-chip economist assessments and the Atlanta Fed. That is not unusual, and sometimes it can be the other way when the consensus is more bullish than the Atlanta Fed. But this is widespread.
Trade Deficits and GDP
In the mathematics of figuring out how much the economy grows, exports increase GDP and imports decrease GDP. In the second quarter, the BEA estimated that the US grew 1.5%. It would have been comfortably in the high 2%’s, except that imports were roughly 1.3%.
Ed Yardeni points out that much of the trade deficit has widened as US imports of computer hardware, components, and accessories soar amid the AI building boom (chart below). In the chart, notice how each of the individual AI data center components is literally showing enormous increases over the last year. Data centers giveth and data centers taketh away.

A Few Thoughts on Interest Rates
Let’s start with the chart below. This is as steep a yield curve as we have seen for some time.

Long-term government interest rates are rising all over the world and not just in the US. So are mortgage rates. Even Japan has long term rates at close to 3% and they are signaling they will raise rates, which will help their currency stabilize.
We got a relatively hawkish Jackson Hole speech from Kevin Warsh. The odds of a rate increase in the September meeting rose slightly, after the BLS labor report. But it is still only in the 60% range.
My personal opinion is that Warsh would clearly like to raise rates at the September meeting, but I don’t know if he has the votes. Unless we get a shockingly low CPI next week, I still think he will have a bias to raise rates.
The problem is what I have talked about for quite some time. Do you really want to be seen as raising rates, and signaling the beginning of a rate hike cycle, immediately in front of an election, general or midterm? Typically, that’s just not done.
After the midterm, I think we will be seeing rates increase. I don’t see how Warsh raises rates in front of the midterm election with a 7-5 or an 8-4 vote. There needs to be some more consensus in an election year at a minimum yes or. Will we get it? This will say a lot about how much of a consensus builder Kevin Warsh is.
Seriously, the economy is growing about the same as it has from the last two decades: a nice, solid Muddle Through. The great fly in the ointment is inflation.
As I have repeatedly said, inflation was triggered by monetary policy under Powell, but I think the response now is geared toward fiscal policy.
I read that Andrew Ross Sorkin said rising rates mean that investors are worried about getting their money back from the US government. I would give a caveat in there that no serious bond investor is worried about whether they will get a dollar back for their bond investments from the US government. What they are legitimately worried about is what that dollar will be worth? Inflation at 3.9% can erode a lot of value.
Ultimately, the bond market and U.S. Congress spending is going to collide, with what could be explosive results.
In the meantime, enjoy your Labor Day weekend.
New York, DC, The Cleveland Clinic and More
I will be in New York Tuesday evening for meetings all day Wednesday and then fly back to San Juan Thursday. I know I will be in DC November 10. I will be in Cleveland on October 11 for Nancy and Mike Roizen’s shared 80th birthday party.
I want to thank so many readers for their very kind words about my daughter Abbi. I was really impressed with the neurosurgeon (Dr. Gene Barnett) and his team that will be handling Abbi’s upcoming brain surgery on November 5. We have as good a team as we could have. The surgery is very difficult in that the benign tumor is growing and located in the center of her brain. A combination of multiple MRI real-time scans, AI and robotics allows them to do these surgeries. Literally, the AI says take this cell and not that cell. We are in such a phenomenal world that this surgery is even available. Five years ago? The prognosis would’ve been much worse.
It was a rather somber week for me, as the funeral I attended caused a lot of reflection. I will turn 77 next month. Even as we get more good news on the longevity front, it’s a race that I want to win, and I know a lot of you do too.
At the barbecue party at Joe Lonsdale’s, I talked to several Republican activists who were not as optimistic as I would’ve thought about the possibility of Ken Paxton being elected Senator from Texas. He is going to need to raise a lot more money. With control of the Senate being in the balance, it seems a lot of Republican donors are very angry that John Cornyn is not on the ballot. I understand as the senator is my friend.
That being said, I’m going to stick to my long-held tradition and not make that many comments about politics as I know my readers are all over the board, and you read me for the economics and finance, not politics.
And with that, I will hit the send button. You enjoy your Labor Day weekend, hopefully with family and friends.
Your getting ready for the gym,

John Mauldin
P.S. If you like my letters, you'll love reading Over My Shoulder with serious economic analysis from my global network, at a surprisingly affordable price. Click here to learn more.
Read important disclosures here.
YOUR USE OF THESE MATERIALS IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DISCLOSURES.
Put Mauldin Economics to work in your portfolio. Your financial journey is unique, and so are your needs. That's why we suggest the following options to suit your preferences:
-
John’s curated thoughts: John Mauldin and editor Patrick Watson share the best research notes and reports of the week, along with a summary of key takeaways. In a world awash with information, John and Patrick help you find the most important insights of the week, from our network of economists and analysts. Read by over 7,500 members. See the full details here.
-
Invest in longevity: Transformative Age delivers proven ways to extend your healthy lifespan, and helps you invest in the world’s most cutting-edge health and biotech companies. See more here.
-
Macro investing: Our flagship investment research service is led by Mauldin Economics partner Ed D’Agostino. His thematic approach to investing gives you a portfolio that will benefit from the economy’s most exciting trends—before they are well known. Go here to learn more about Macro Advantage.
Recent Articles
Revisiting Muddle Through
September 4, 2026
In Your Backyard: Jobs, Growth, and the Race We're Actually In
August 28, 2026
AI In Your Backyard: The Water and the Wires
August 21, 2026
Caught in a Debt Trap
August 14, 2026
What’s in Your Portfolio Wallet?
August 7, 2026
The Fed Conundrum: Who’s Got the Votes?
July 31, 2026

Thoughts from the Frontline
Follow John Mauldin as he uncovers the truth behind, and beyond, the financial headlines. This in-depth weekly dispatch helps you understand what's happening in the economy and navigate the markets with confidence.
Let the master guide you through this new decade of living dangerously
John Mauldin's Thoughts from the Frontline
Free in your inbox every Saturday
By opting in you are also consenting to receive Mauldin Economics' marketing emails. You can opt-out from these at any time. Privacy Policy





John. This article could have used better editing. There were too many errors and places where the readability could have been improved.
Didn’t know about your daughter. My thoughts are with her.
Sending positive thoughts for your daughter and family. God speed.
To call today’s booming economy, a
Muddle through economy is a great injustice to your previous book. Compared to the time when you coined the term middle economy there is absolutely no comparison. I suggest you go back and read your own book.
Hello John,
Not sure I should understand that you remain on same page or feel a little less certain about muddling through.
Best,
I have to add my support for Brian McMorris's willingness to mention the elephant in the room -- the one ignored by too many of our financial analysts and all of our Political Class. That is to say -- the destructive economic effect of the unsustainable trade deficit.
How will that unsustainable trade deficit end? One likely outcome is that the terms of trade will adjust to reality. The exchange rate for the US Dollar will collapse, imports to the US will become unaffordable, and we will face decades of genuine poverty while our guilty Political Class are driven out, along with their lawyers and NGOs, and the US slowly painfully re-industrializes. Any investor or citizen who is not preparing for that harsh likelihood is living in fantasy land.
Note that there will be other consequences as the unsustainable trade deficit comes to an end. China will face mass unemployment as US citizens are no longer able to afford Chinese imports. History suggests a likely response by China's rulers will be to conscript those unemployed workers into the army -- and we can guess where that will lead.
Is it already too late for the US to begin serious re-industrialization and rebalance international trade? We will never find out, because investors and politicians do not take the unsustainable trade deficit seriously.
Please consider, JM, when describing "Muddle Through" as GDP below 2% the difficulty of getting it north of 2% when America has such a large trade imbalance, which, as I have said before, increases the national debt by shipping so many printed $$ offshore to pay for the imported goods. That is one of the largest factors in the GDP calculation and has been negative for 50 years, let alone 25. It has been an uphill climb to get better GDP Growth overcoming such a liability as net imports (to say nothing about what it does to employment and the quality of small factory town life). The Net Imports number is now well over $1.1T per year. Even the giant capex buildout of AI Data Centers is not helping much as we import so much electronics to fill the centers, including much of the Nvidia chips manufactured in Taiwan. We had a $89K net import month in July. This factors into GDP in a big way. $1.1T annualized is about 4% of total annual GDP. That is a -4% that must be made up with other domestic goods and services on the plus side of the ledger. Imports also end up fueling net inventory, as imports have logistical barriers and so require more, not less inventory, which is another negative against GDP. This can be viewed on a daily basis at GDPNOW.com the Atlanta Fed Reserve site. The components of GDP are listed below the moving graph. Everyone was excited by the 4.7% start to the quarter. But Net Imports and Inventory eat away at the gains through the quarter. https://www.atlantafed.org/research-and-data/data/gdpnow
Quoting from Barry Habib today, you wrote:
“While today’s BLS report was strong across the board, it does not jive with the other labor market reports from ADP and Revelio. BLS includes government, so in order to compare apples to apples, we have to look at the BS private payroll figure, which was +127,000. That compares with +38,080 p.m. post 37,000 in Revelio - clearly some big disparities."
So, did you drop an "L" in there, or were you expressing your opinion of the private payroll figure?
First of all, I thought the Fed was supposed to be independent, so why can’t they the raise rates at the next meeting. Are you you saying they should be a political body? And Powell lowered rates by 50 basis points in September of 2024.
And with respect to a muddle through 2% economy over the past 20 years, it took $40 trillion of stimulus in the form of government debt and Fed QE to achieve that. Without that stimulus, there would have been no growth. You have always said debt is consumption brought forward, so, it is not really “growth”. And another big boost to the economy has been the “wealth effect” of higher asset prices (intentionally targeted by the Fed). That is another form of stimulus, and that is what is supporting consumption for the higher end consumers. I wrote a letter to you explaining how all of the stimulus (debt and the wealth effect) being injected into the economy is the reason corporate profits are soaring. Stimulus is rocket fuel fir corporate profits for reasons I described in the letter. But I believe nearly all stimulus is economic activity brought forward. It is unsustainable and will eventually have to be reversed (paid back). So, I believe corporate profits (and equity prices) will actually come back down (a lot) when the stimulus ends and reverses. At that point, the paper gains that have helped pensions funding status may be prove to be an illusion. I appreciate your optimism and positive thinking, but if it results in us whistling past the graveyard and not taking actions that need to be taken to right the ship, it is not helping us over the long run.
I’m wondering what John means by the following:
“At some point we will get some serious analysis of how the large influx of illegal immigrants messed with the jobs numbers and now with both government and self-deportations, the number of workers in the US is dropping and it’s clearly, at least for this past month, finally showing up in the participation rate.”
—-Is John trying to say that immigrants (illegal or otherwise really) are detrimental to our economy, or beneficial because we need workers?