
The Bipolar Economy, Part 2
Today we continue my 2026 economic and market forecast. Last week I described our current environment as The Bipolar Economy, featuring wild and frequent mood swings. We could also add psychosis to the symptom list.
For example, why have silver prices (roughly) doubled in the last three months? What changed to make it suddenly more valuable? I know, it’s supply and demand in a relatively thin market. But it’s seems to be more than just a classic short squeeze. (More below)
The broader point is that so many trends and events simply don’t make sense right now. They seem disconnected from reality. That’s the definition of “psychotic” and, at least among investors, it may be approaching pandemic status.
I think part of the explanation may be that we live in different realities, often defined by our news sources and social media habits. We increasingly feel entitled not just to our own opinions but to our own facts. Strange market activity is one consequence.
Unfortunately, I can’t solve that problem. What I can do is share with you the latest thoughts of sources I’ve found interesting and reliable. As I noted last week, the real goal here isn’t to tell you what will happen. It’s to help you know what could happen so you can be prepared.
Eight Themes
We’ll begin with David Bahnsen, whose Year Behind, Year Ahead white paper should be on your must-read list. (Hit the small subscribe button on that page to get his daily content. It’s one of my favorites!)
Last week I briefly mentioned David’s thoughts on AI. That was one of eight 2026 themes he described in the report. Last year he was 8 for 8, so we’ll see how it goes this year, but he is one of the most thoughtful analysts I know and is someone you should follow. Considering it alongside his other seven themes will help you put it all in better context. So, here’s the full list and some highlights.
AI Vulnerabilities Will Become Much More Evident to the Markets
“The late 2025 pause in the AI trade did see some stock prices drop a great deal, and others drop a modest amount, but very little was fully broken or purged. A company like Oracle ended the year down 44% from its high of three months earlier, yet still up 17% on the year. Froth may have come out of some names, but much of these declines are simply air coming out of prior inflations. There is ample vulnerability to be found if and when sentiment reverses, and that sentiment reversal is not likely to come until there is some fundamental breakdown.”
While I agree with this, the sentiment underlying the AI stock boom is not entirely rational. Some of it is self-perpetuating; the math of capitalization-weighted indexes forces other investors to follow the crowd. As Keynes famously noted, markets can stay irrational for a long time.
Hence, the kind of “fundamental breakdown” David thinks necessary to a sentiment reversal may need longer than we think to get investors to reconsider. People who are sitting on huge open gains don’t easily admit the ride is over.
The Economy is in a Tug-of-War Between Two Unknowns
“What we have is an unknown potential growth driver (new tax provisions) competing with an unknown potential risk (labor), with tariff uncertainties thrown in for good measure. The bold thing to do here would be to take a side: ‘The labor market will weaken further and expose a real vulnerability in this economy that supply-side tax cuts will not be able to fix’ – or, perhaps – ‘The OBBBA tax provisions will prove to be an underrated source of growth and productivity in 2026 that will drive more capital investment, more hiring, and continued wage growth.’ These sentences cannot co-exist, yet I am fairly certain one of them will prove to be the economic story of 2026.”
Midterm Elections: The House Will Flip to Democratic Control But the Senate Will Stay Under GOP Control
“What about the midterms could spike volatility in the year ahead? (1) The magnitude of the first half of my forecast (could a Democratic takeover of the House be bigger than currently expected); and (2) The accuracy of the second half of the prediction (despite overwhelming GOP advantages in the Senate map, should a blue wave become material, this expectation could potentially be called into question).”
Housing Will Get Cheaper This Year, Or There Will Be Problems
“From the financial sector to the construction sector to the retail sector, housing has a long tail. The combination of inadequate supply, high price expectations from would-be sellers, prohibitively high borrowing rates for would-be buyers, and too-good-to-sell rates for current owners all “froze” housing activity over the last couple of years, with little gains on the affordability front, and no gains for those looking to tell themselves their houses are more valuable than they were a year ago…
“The most natural solution to this is a modest re-pricing and I expect that to happen in the lion’s share of American metro markets in 2026 (it has already begun in many of the frothiest). The economic benefits here are for buyers and those with adjacent connectivity to housing activity. That latter point has concerned the Federal Reserve for some time, and it is where I believe the biggest need lies.”
Housing prices are kind of a chicken-and-egg problem. Getting them down is necessary to keep inflation under control. But without lower inflation, it’s harder for the Fed to justify rate cuts. The Trump administration is working on a few possibly helpful policies, like having Fannie Mae buy mortgage bonds. But those have risks, too. And the real problem is inadequate housing supply. Solving that problem is largely in the hands of NIMBY-leaning local voters.
Small-Cap Earnings Growth Will Outpace S&P 500 Earnings Growth

Foreign Appetite for U.S. Assets to Stay Strong
“Not only am I unconvinced that the delta between our imports and exports will really go down that much as a result of tariffs (I see total trade being impacted more than the trade deficit), the fundamental reasons for foreign investment into U.S. markets remain the presumption until proven otherwise.”
The Energy Sector to be A Solid Contrarian Play in 2026
“I say this knowing oil is sitting around $58 and that the White House would love for it to be even lower. But I also believe that OPEC+ is a larger factor than the U.S. in where total global supply goes next year, and I do not believe most of those countries can afford to elevate production much with prices in the 50’s.”

Energy stocks may well stage a rally this year, but the fact that they are near a record-low share of the market doesn’t make it inevitable. The share could increase from the 2.9% that his chart shows even if energy stocks go sideways. A little shrinkage in the technology sector would do it.
M&A (Again!)
“The pent-up need for exit events in private equity has not subsided from a year ago. IPOs (SPAC and otherwise) seem to have a high capacity for digestion at present. There is huge desire from sovereign wealth funds to participate in large-size equity transactions. And last year was just the first year of a Trump administration that has, so far, been giving the green light to mega-cap M&A. Even as private equity deals with its own capacity issues for exit transactions, there paradoxically exists ample dry powder for acquisition events.”
This M&A trend, while good in some ways, has the side effect of helping the big get bigger. Successful small-cap companies are less likely to grow into large ones because they get acquired, sometimes before they even go public. This means fewer opportunities for individual investors.
As you know, David Bahnsen and The Bahnsen Group are my favorite wealth management firm. I believe their style of dividends mixed with alternatives offers us the best way to get through what I think will be coming the future crisis. Many of your fellow readers agree. I have mentioned various managers before, but I have never seen this level of response. Clearly, TBG is resonating with my readers. You can find out why by talking with one of their representatives and learning more here. Ask them for my white paper on why I have chosen TBG to manage my assets.
Inflation Reset
My friend Ed Easterling of Crestmont Research has a fascinating way of pulling statistics apart to find out what really drives them. Recently he dissected the inflation data to explain why yearly rates will probably fall over the next few months.
The key is in what is sometimes called the “base effect.” Each monthly report doesn’t just add more data. It also removes data as the year-ago month drops out of the annual rate. And if that year-ago month showed high inflation, the yearly rate could drop a lot. Ed thinks that is what will happen in 2026.
Ed explains this better than I can. Here is his table and short description of what it shows.

“The table provides a forward view of the statistical biases in reported CPI reports. The reported value for CPI each month is the year-over-year value. However, each month brings one new month of current data (prior months are not revised).
“Thus, each monthly annual report reflects eleven of twelve months in the preceding month's report, plus the new month's data.
“In other words, each monthly annual inflation rate drops the value from a year ago and adds the new value.
“When the values from a year earlier are relatively high, there is a bias in the data toward a declining inflation report (and vice versa).
“For example, if the January 2026 annualized M/M inflation rate is less than 8.14%, the reported CPI value for January will decline from December’s 2.7%.

