The 10th Man

It’s Goldhammer Time

February 25, 2016

There is no doubt about it. Gold is back.

This is the most magnificent chart in all of the capital markets right now. There is no arguing that. The deflationists/gold haters can argue about the investment merits of gold until the cows come home, but there is no arguing with that chart. Which explains some of the gold haters’ silence.

People are buying upside calls for the first time in forever. The old call skew—where call options are more expensive than put options—is coming back. They are selling puts to buy calls (risk reversals) and call spreads (call spread collars). Just about every bullish options structure is being put on in gold.

This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.

Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with this must-read report from Jared Dillian.

There was a parabolic move up to 1,250, and now it is consolidating.

There will be another parabolic move soon, probably up to 1,400.

That is the technical case. Let me lay out the fundamental case.

We’ve Lost Our Minds

First you had zero interest rates.

Then you had quantitative easing.

Now you have negative interest rates.

The central banks are finding it difficult to implement negative rates because people hoard cash. The Japanese are buying safes to store it all.

Of course, the government can eliminate high-denomination bills (as Larry Summers wants to do with the $100 bill) or even make it illegal to hold cash, so that NIRP can be implemented successfully.

There is a larger discussion here about economic freedom and privacy and anonymity, but I’ll save that for another time.

Like I said, the authorities are finding it difficult to implement negative rates (the Swiss are hoarding CHF1,000 notes to avoid -0.75% interest rates), so people are quite openly speculating about the possibility of OMT—outright monetary transactions.

That’s when central banks print money—and put it in your bank account. Everyone’s bank account.

There was an article in the UK Telegraph about it here. I suggest you read it and then pick up here where you left off.

So like I said, we have lost our minds. We’ve gone cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs. Seriously. If it were 1996 and I told you we were considering just handing out free money in 2016, you would have taken a swing at me. But here we are, talking about it.

There are a couple of reasons why this absolute lunacy is being considered a serious possibility:

  • Central banks and governments can no longer tolerate a recession. It used to be, you get a downturn in the economy, you tough it out, and it will come back eventually. I graduated high school in 1992. Right at the end of the recession. People called it the “jobless recovery” and said youngsters wouldn’t be able to get jobs. They did, eventually. The free market has a way of doing that.
  • We’ve gone far, far to the left politically in the last 30 years.
  • Keynesianism and interventionist policy have become very much in vogue. Hard to believe that Hayek and Friedman once won Nobel Prizes, back when neoliberal economics was in fashion.
  • There are worries about political instability in the case of a downturn, but I’d argue that we are getting political instability in the upturn, because of monetary policy.
  • Groupthink. Get any unaccountable committee together, and they will come up with stupid ideas.

If you asked a second-grader what would happen if you suddenly printed money and put it in people’s bank accounts, they would be able to give you the correct answer: Prices are going up. Duh. Yet a bunch of PhDs think it’s a brilliant idea.

This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.

Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with The 5 ETF Trading Strategies You Should Know About Before Investing, from Jared Dillian.

Don’t let a bunch of PhDs ever run anything. Ever. Let alone the global economy.

So yes, I predict that this is going to happen. I think it is going to happen in Japan first, then elsewhere. Will it happen in the United States? I think it would take a lot. We still have a Fed that is reasonably hawkish on inflation. I’m sure Evans and maybe Rosengren would think it were a good idea, but I’d say the FOMC is far from having consensus on this particular issue.

Look, quantitative easing was considered to be nuts in 2008. I said back then that we would have quantitative easing. It happened.

We are going to have OMT. Probably in the next year, it is going to happen somewhere in the world.

The Trade

The trade is easy. Gold!

Some people are already starting to think about downside in the bond market, putting on steepeners, etc. When inflation strikes, it will hit the long end of the yield curve. I think that might be premature. Don’t get me wrong—OMT will probably result in the bond market going down in flames, but I would be surprised if that happened in 2016.

You probably have noticed that newsletter writers are seldom this explicit when it comes to trade ideas. I will cop to that. I am usually unwilling to really stick my neck out on a marginal idea.

I am more sure about this one. We spent five years contemplating tighter monetary policy (but not actually doing it, except for 25 bps at the end). Notice all the rate hike talk is pretty much over.

Two-thirds of investing is getting ahead of dumb policy. Free stuff—this is the easiest one in the world.

[Ed. Note: The author is long GLD and physical gold.]

Before I leave, I should remind you that today is the last day where you can get the Mauldin 3-for-1 Bundle (Street Freak, Yield Shark, and Over My Shoulder) for just $199. You save 75%, which I would say is a pretty good deal, so you might want to look into it.

Jared Dillian
Jared Dillian


Get Thought-Provoking Contrarian
Insights from Jared Dillian

Discuss This

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.


There are no comments at this time.

Use of this content, the Mauldin Economics website, and related sites and applications is provided under the Mauldin Economics Terms & Conditions of Use.

Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited

The information provided in this publication is private, privileged, and confidential information, licensed for your sole individual use as a subscriber. Mauldin Economics reserves all rights to the content of this publication and related materials. Forwarding, copying, disseminating, or distributing this report in whole or in part, including substantial quotation of any portion the publication or any release of specific investment recommendations, is strictly prohibited.
Participation in such activity is grounds for immediate termination of all subscriptions of registered subscribers deemed to be involved at Mauldin Economics’ sole discretion, may violate the copyright laws of the United States, and may subject the violator to legal prosecution. Mauldin Economics reserves the right to monitor the use of this publication without disclosure by any electronic means it deems necessary and may change those means without notice at any time. If you have received this publication and are not the intended subscriber, please contact


The Mauldin Economics website, Yield Shark, Thoughts from the Frontline, Patrick Cox’s Tech Digest, Outside the Box, Over My Shoulder, World Money Analyst, Street Freak, ETF 20/20, Just One Trade, Transformational Technology Alert, Rational Bear, The 10th Man, Connecting the Dots, This Week in Geopolitics, Stray Reflections, and Conversations are published by Mauldin Economics, LLC. Information contained in such publications is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The information contained in such publications is not intended to constitute individual investment advice and is not designed to meet your personal financial situation. The opinions expressed in such publications are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. The information in such publications may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. You are advised to discuss with your financial advisers your investment options and whether any investment is suitable for your specific needs prior to making any investments.
John Mauldin, Mauldin Economics, LLC and other entities in which he has an interest, employees, officers, family, and associates may from time to time have positions in the securities or commodities covered in these publications or web site. Corporate policies are in effect that attempt to avoid potential conflicts of interest and resolve conflicts of interest that do arise in a timely fashion.
Mauldin Economics, LLC reserves the right to cancel any subscription at any time, and if it does so it will promptly refund to the subscriber the amount of the subscription payment previously received relating to the remaining subscription period. Cancellation of a subscription may result from any unauthorized use or reproduction or rebroadcast of any Mauldin Economics publication or website, any infringement or misappropriation of Mauldin Economics, LLC’s proprietary rights, or any other reason determined in the sole discretion of Mauldin Economics, LLC.

Affiliate Notice

Mauldin Economics has affiliate agreements in place that may include fee sharing. If you have a website or newsletter and would like to be considered for inclusion in the Mauldin Economics affiliate program, please go to Likewise, from time to time Mauldin Economics may engage in affiliate programs offered by other companies, though corporate policy firmly dictates that such agreements will have no influence on any product or service recommendations, nor alter the pricing that would otherwise be available in absence of such an agreement. As always, it is important that you do your own due diligence before transacting any business with any firm, for any product or service.

© Copyright 2018 Mauldin Economics