Connecting the Dots

The Great American Jobs Apocalypse, and What to Do About It

February 14, 2017

The Great American Jobs Apocalypse is still threatening to cause tears in America’s social fabric, and no one really knows what to do about it.

If you’re not unemployed or underemployed now, then you know someone who is… and you could always be next.

I keep coming back to this theme in Connecting the Dots, because a) it’s a monumental, paradigm-changing problem, and b) it affects all of us.

While I don’t have definitive answers, I managed to put together more of the puzzle pieces.

Lost Value

We the People, aka Mainstream America, are angry and frustrated—and we are vehemently making our feelings known. The open public discontent has left many economists and politicians flabbergasted: With a historically low unemployment rate of 4.9%, what seems to be the problem?

For most people, work is not just about money, but also about self-worth. You can be “employed” but still feel unappreciated due to low wages, missing job security, or inability to use your best skills.

The government’s unemployment numbers miss part of the story. They don’t, for example, show how many people aren’t getting enough hours to make ends meet and/or lack job satisfaction. But some recent surveys do.

  • According to a 2016 survey from PayScale, 46% of workers (roughly 22 million Americans) think they're “underemployed”—which is being defined as either working part time or having a job that doesn’t allow them to use their education or skills.
  • A 2016 Gallup poll found that only 32% of US workers are “engaged” in their jobs. 50.8% of employees were “not engaged,” while another 17.2% were “actively disengaged.”

“Not engaged” means employees that are less vigilant, show up and kill time, and doing the minimum required to get the job done. According to the poll, a full 68% of American workers are just going through the motions at their job. That figure that should give employers pause.


Photo: Getty Images

Also, not-engaged or actively disengaged workers always have one foot out the door. Why show loyalty to your company when your employer is ready to kick you out as soon as it has a bad quarter or can find a robot to replace you?

Loyalty—or lack of it—goes both ways. Today, many employers skimp on benefits and wage increases by hiring part-time or temp workers. Hiring full-time employees is their last resort… once they’ve exhausted alternatives like automation, outsourcing, and independent contractors.

This persistent background angst has a macroeconomic impact, reducing productivity, increasing depression, and creating addictive behaviors. It’s probably no coincidence that mortality rates are rising for middle-aged Americans.

A  2016 analysis from the Commonwealth Fund found that “not only are middle-aged white people drinking more, using more opioids, and killing themselves at higher rates, more of them are getting sick with the diseases that usually kill older people. And when they do get sick, they don’t get better.”

So we need more than jobs. We need well-paid, fulfilling jobs that match people’s abilities and ambitions. That’s a much heavier lift.

But look around, and you’ll see glimmers of hope.

Coal Miner to Coder

I wrote a few weeks ago why we shouldn’t call people “low-skilled” workers. It’s demeaning and often just wrong.

However, the category exists, and it’s true that non-college graduate Americans face tougher job prospects. And despite increases in minimum wage in some places, since 2000, the average hourly wage for high school graduates has declined.

Also, factories are automating rapidly, and there are only so many service jobs to go around. They don’t pay like the factories once did, anyway.

But there may be a solution, at least for some.

Last week, I saw an intriguing Wired article titled, The Next Big Blue-Collar Job Is Coding, which  argues that computer programming is the modern equivalent of those well-paying automotive factory jobs.

Many people think everyone working in tech is a wealthy Silicon Valley type, but most “coders” work in ordinary, non-tech organizations.


Photo: Getty Images

Any organization with 50–100 employees probably has at least two or three IT people who work on customizing software to the company’s needs.

Those folks generally make a good living, and there’s lots of room for programmers and graphic designers without college degrees.

All those little teams add up to a lot of jobs—and it turns out, some former blue-collar workers excel at them. Wired mentions a Kentucky program that retrains coal miners as programmers. Miners know how to focus, work as a team, and handle complex machinery. Program Director Rusty Justice says, “Coal miners are really technology workers who get dirty.”

I’m sure these jobs will get automated too as artificial intelligence improves, but for now they look like good opportunities for those with the right aptitude.

Hands-On Jobs Safest—for Now

There are still other growing occupations that don’t require college degrees. The US Labor Department tracks these in 10-year forecasts. Its Occupation Finder web tool is pretty enlightening.

One thing stood out to me: a high school diploma, while still necessary, is insufficient for almost anything beyond manual labor. And even the number of those jobs is shrinking.

I searched for jobs at the next step up, requiring only “postsecondary nondegree” education. That means a high school diploma plus trade school or on-the-job training. Those with the highest number of projected new jobs in the next 10 years are:

  • Heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers
  • Dental assistants
  • Hairdressers, hairstylists, and cosmetologists
  • Licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses
  • Nursing assistants
  • Emergency medical technicians and paramedics
  • Medical assistants

I’m dubious about the truck driver jobs, given how quickly autonomous vehicle technology is advancing. But the others all make sense. They are mostly healthcare related and—this is key—require hands-on contact with customers.

You can’t get your teeth cleaned over the Internet. It will be a few years before we trust robots to cut our hair. Jobs like those will be among the last to get automated.


Photo: Getty Images

Still, if we look ahead more than 10 years, I think all bets are off. Every job will be vulnerable—including mine. A sufficiently advanced AI could probably process all the information I read every day and compile it into informative articles.

Such technology doesn’t exist now… but I bet it will by 2030.

My response: Never stop learning!

If we want to outrun the machines, we all need to constantly upgrade our skills. We also have to build our investments into another reliable income stream.

That’s what I do in my monthly premium service, Yield Shark: find ways to generate steady income with manageable risk. I also try to keep the journey enjoyable, because I know we all need it.

Right now, we have a special offer you should consider. For just $199, you can get 12 months of Yield Shark, 12 months of Jared Dillian’s Street Freak, and 12 months of John Mauldin’s Over My Shoulder. That’s 70% off the normal price. The offer expires tomorrow, February 15, though, so click here to sign up now.

See you at the top,

Patrick Watson
@PatrickW

 

Subscribe to Connecting the Dots—and
Get a Glimpse of the Future

Discuss This

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

There are no comments at this time.


Use of this content, the Mauldin Economics website, and related sites and applications is provided under the Mauldin Economics Terms & Conditions of Use.

Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited

The information provided in this publication is private, privileged, and confidential information, licensed for your sole individual use as a subscriber. Mauldin Economics reserves all rights to the content of this publication and related materials. Forwarding, copying, disseminating, or distributing this report in whole or in part, including substantial quotation of any portion the publication or any release of specific investment recommendations, is strictly prohibited.
Participation in such activity is grounds for immediate termination of all subscriptions of registered subscribers deemed to be involved at Mauldin Economics’ sole discretion, may violate the copyright laws of the United States, and may subject the violator to legal prosecution. Mauldin Economics reserves the right to monitor the use of this publication without disclosure by any electronic means it deems necessary and may change those means without notice at any time. If you have received this publication and are not the intended subscriber, please contact service@mauldineconomics.com.

Disclaimers

The Mauldin Economics website, Yield Shark, Thoughts from the Frontline, Patrick Cox’s Tech Digest, Outside the Box, Over My Shoulder, World Money Analyst, Street Freak, Just One Trade, Transformational Technology Alert, Rational Bear, The 10th Man, Connecting the Dots, This Week in Geopolitics, Stray Reflections, and Conversations are published by Mauldin Economics, LLC. Information contained in such publications is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The information contained in such publications is not intended to constitute individual investment advice and is not designed to meet your personal financial situation. The opinions expressed in such publications are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. The information in such publications may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. You are advised to discuss with your financial advisers your investment options and whether any investment is suitable for your specific needs prior to making any investments.
John Mauldin, Mauldin Economics, LLC and other entities in which he has an interest, employees, officers, family, and associates may from time to time have positions in the securities or commodities covered in these publications or web site. Corporate policies are in effect that attempt to avoid potential conflicts of interest and resolve conflicts of interest that do arise in a timely fashion.
Mauldin Economics, LLC reserves the right to cancel any subscription at any time, and if it does so it will promptly refund to the subscriber the amount of the subscription payment previously received relating to the remaining subscription period. Cancellation of a subscription may result from any unauthorized use or reproduction or rebroadcast of any Mauldin Economics publication or website, any infringement or misappropriation of Mauldin Economics, LLC’s proprietary rights, or any other reason determined in the sole discretion of Mauldin Economics, LLC.

Affiliate Notice

Mauldin Economics has affiliate agreements in place that may include fee sharing. If you have a website or newsletter and would like to be considered for inclusion in the Mauldin Economics affiliate program, please go to http://affiliates.ggcpublishing.com/. Likewise, from time to time Mauldin Economics may engage in affiliate programs offered by other companies, though corporate policy firmly dictates that such agreements will have no influence on any product or service recommendations, nor alter the pricing that would otherwise be available in absence of such an agreement. As always, it is important that you do your own due diligence before transacting any business with any firm, for any product or service.

© Copyright 2017 Mauldin Economics