The 10th Man

Public Service Loan Forgiveness

January 24, 2019

The Public Service Loan Forgiveness program was signed into law by the Bush Administration in 2007. The idea was to give financial relief to people who had spent a lot of money on higher education, but chose to work in less financially-rewarding jobs. This included people at any level of government service, including 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organizations.

I heard about the PSLF in conversation a couple of years ago, and I genuinely thought it was a scam. Having your student loans forgiven by working in public service? It definitely sounded too good to be true.

This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.

Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with this must-read report from Jared Dillian.

It is true, but it is a mess. Some 41,000 individual borrowers have attempted to take advantage of the program—with only about 200 requests granted. That’s an approval rate of less than one percent.

Why?

Well, the requirements are pretty stringent:

  1. Borrowers must have Direct Loans as opposed to other types of loans.
  1. They have to be in a specific repayment plan, and of course, they have to work in the right type of job.
  1. Most importantly, borrowers must make 120 successful payments, which don’t need to be consecutive.
  1. And the payments have to be for the exact minimum amount, or else the loan is in “paid-ahead” status, and disqualified.

And the Department of Education did not do a great job of communicating the requirements, so there is a slew of applicants who are in the wrong types of loans or making the wrong types of payments. It is a bit of a fiasco.

Last March, the government put a band-aid on this by allocating some additional money for borrowers who were in a qualified public service job, but were barred from PSLF because their repayment plan did not qualify.

But because a lot of student loans were private before 2010, there simply aren’t that many people who fulfill the requirements anyway, and there won’t be for a while.

     
-

Mauldin Economics Reader:

Did you see Mark Yusko's bold call at the American Disruption Summit?

Mark Yusko

"The Greatest Wealth Creation Opportunity of Our Lifetimes" is how he put it...

Click here to watch the replay for free before it's pulled down »

-
     

Here Is Where Things Get Interesting

Say you make 120 (or more) payments on your student loans, and those payments are predominantly interest (because remember, you need to pay the exact minimum amount to qualify for PSLF).

At the end of ten years, you would almost have paid off the entire balance of your student loans—in interest payments. If a borrower had taken the same money and aggressively paid off the loans, allocating the money to principal, the loans would mostly have been paid off.

I could not dream up a crueler government program if I tried. The PSLF has incentivized tens of thousands of people to pay the minimum on their student loans in the hope that they will one day be forgiven.

Of course, after a decade of paying the minimum on your student loans, your finances are completely wrecked, and you will be dependent on a bailout.

Yes, the program has noble intentions, and yes, it is unimaginably cruel. Yet the part that is astounding is the number of people who line up for it, facing such enormous odds.

Over time, communication will improve and more people will be able to take advantage of PSLF. But for now, borrowers don’t have much of a chance of forgiveness—and are willing to financially impale themselves while they wait.

The Constraints Of Debt

There is something peculiar about the American experience, where paying down debt is considered to be one of the least psychologically rewarding things you can do.

Consumption is rewarding: you get to buy cars, jewelry, clothes.

Investing is rewarding: you get to buy stocks and watch them increase in value.

This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.

Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with The 5 ETF Trading Strategies You Should Know About Before Investing, from Jared Dillian.

Paying down debt isn’t rewarding at all. You log in to look at your mortgage and the number is smaller—big deal.

Whether it’s a car loan, a home mortgage, a student loan, or any type of loan, the number of people who aggressively pay down principal and retire the debt ahead of the maturity date is very small.

There are a couple of different ways to look at debt.

  • The Wall Street way is to look at a 4% mortgage, and ask the following question: can I make more than 4% in the capital markets? If so, I should keep the debt and invest the free cash in stocks and bonds and earn the spread. This is not irrational. Any textbook will tell you to do this.
  • A less enlightened way (my way) to look at it is as follows: any interest you pay to a bank is unproductive and should be minimized.

To have debt is to be constrained, and true freedom comes from being free of debt. We learned recently that 1 in 5 millennials expect to die without ever paying off their debt. What a horrible existence.

The PSLF paints a pretty grim picture of Americans’ attitudes towards debt—they will do absolutely anything to avoid paying it off.

A recession would certainly change people’s perspective on debt, just like the last one did. Judging from the behavior of government workers affected by the shutdown, people are pretty stretched. At the tippy-top of the cycle, that is not very encouraging.

Jared Dillian
Jared Dillian

 

Get Thought-Provoking Contrarian
Insights from Jared Dillian

Discuss This

0 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

bagpiper7er@yahoo.com

Jan. 27, 1:22 p.m.

Could this program also be the product of political solutions?  This looks like a program with feel good intentions and well meaning but because of the fiscal cost it was designed ON PURPOSE to never really be taken seriously?  Both sides of the aisle can claim they did something while really doing nothing.

Mike Leach

Jan. 25, 12:47 p.m.

Yep.  A very sad situation all around.

Take the case of my own daughter.  In her 40’s, after a “detour”, she turned her life around.  She went to college and got her bachelors’ and then her masters’ degrees.  The degrees are in social work, which pretty much guarantees a lifetime of low-income jobs, whether she works in the public or private sectors.  Perhaps not the wisest choice of majors, but far better then where she was headed at one time.  She insisted on doing all this without help from anyone.  She is now done, and full-time employed (and going with a really great guy).  Mom & Dad (and step-mom & step-dad) are all quite proud of her. 

Unfortunately, daughter does have student loan debts she will NEVER be able to repay.  At her likely lifetime income levels, paying extra and paying down principle is an unrealistic option).  She has, quite diligently (with a bit of dad’s advice) made sure she has strictly maintained the exact requirements for PSLF.  And perhaps that will happen one day.  Now, Dad could actually pay off those debts for her - but why should I?  It is likely that, through my tax dollars, I am going be helping to pay of EVERYONE’S student loans anyway.  So, Jared, in addition to all the other drawbacks you had so accurately chronicled with PSLF, the program has also succeeded in making “bad” parents and “bad” public citizens of some of the rest of us.

Hopefully (in my personal case) PLSF will work for my daughter as advertised, though there is definitely no guarantee.  If it doesn’t, daughter will be making a modest required minimum payment monthly - eventually out of her Social Security check - for the rest of her natural life.  Assuming things work out, an inheritance from me (dad) will make up for this.

(Of course, it is quite possible that John’s Great Debt Reset will have occurred by then, and/or my daughter will be able to repay her student loans in US dollars that by that time will be worth the equivalent to 1/10 of a bottle-top.  Daughter will probably have some of dad’s physical gold coins to help - but that’s another story ;-)

aoee1987@msn.com

Jan. 24, 9:52 p.m.

I like the way you think, Jared. I’ve pretty much always tried to pay cash or to get rid of a loan before it due if it were a purchase larger than I had the cash at the time. I equate paying interest on especially smaller purchases as a tax which limits my ability to do more with my resources. It a great investment though for for the one who is being paid the interest.
Dean Yoder
.

jack goldman

Jan. 24, 1:14 p.m.

Legally counterfeiting debt should be a crime against humanity and was since the time of Hamurabi in Sumer. Debt always takes over any system, especially with lending ten times deposits. Bankers lend at 4% and collect 40%, lend at 18% and collect 180%, giving the public 1% or less interest. This is doomed to collapse the civilization as bankers turn Main Street into debt slaves. The traditional punishment for counterfeiting is death and this is why. Legal or illegal counterfeiting have the same effect, debt slaves, which destroy life. Currently the 1% are eating the 99% alive as debt slaves. This is child abuse. It has to stop. Jews were allowed to charge interest but Christians and Muslims were not. This is why Jews have an inordinate amount of power in today’s society. We should end legal counterfeiting and lending at interest. Legal debt notes are not money. Only gold and silver is real money. The debt slavery for children born as debt slaves is a crime against humanity. These debts need to be discharged as they were in Hammurabi’s time, with debt forgiveness to free up people’s incomes to buy good and services.

Jim Johnson 34645

Jan. 24, 12:39 p.m.

Somewhere in my dimmest memory there is this recurrent theme that keeping another’s money is theft.  Honoring your word is a requirement of living.  Simply you pay your debts.  And with this in mind, you don’t borrow with out the means to repay.  Indeed an old rule is that your house should not cost more than 2 1/2 times your wages. 
In the old days the first requirement of getting a loan was one’s character.  Today, with everything on line and sight unseen this is determined by ones credit reports.  Then there came “capacity” and “collateral.”

School debt.  I graduated with my MA in 1977 with no debt.  Ditto BA in 1966.  The GI bill helped but I worked at least 30 hours a week and every summer.  My son got his BSME in 2007, with no debt.  He worked (co-opted) every other semester.  I did loan him a pickup for the duration.  That was paid for a year after he graduated.

Of course if one managed to escape high school with no skills, look in the mirror.
jim johnson
greenfield, mo


Use of this content, the Mauldin Economics website, and related sites and applications is provided under the Mauldin Economics Terms & Conditions of Use.

Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited

The information provided in this publication is private, privileged, and confidential information, licensed for your sole individual use as a subscriber. Mauldin Economics reserves all rights to the content of this publication and related materials. Forwarding, copying, disseminating, or distributing this report in whole or in part, including substantial quotation of any portion the publication or any release of specific investment recommendations, is strictly prohibited.
Participation in such activity is grounds for immediate termination of all subscriptions of registered subscribers deemed to be involved at Mauldin Economics’ sole discretion, may violate the copyright laws of the United States, and may subject the violator to legal prosecution. Mauldin Economics reserves the right to monitor the use of this publication without disclosure by any electronic means it deems necessary and may change those means without notice at any time. If you have received this publication and are not the intended subscriber, please contact service@mauldineconomics.com.

Disclaimers

The Mauldin Economics website, Thoughts from the Frontline, The Weekly Profit, The 10th Man, Connecting the Dots, Transformational Technology Digest, Over My Shoulder, Yield Shark, Transformational Technology Alert, Rational Bear, Street Freak, ETF 20/20, In the Money, and Mauldin Economics VIP are published by Mauldin Economics, LLC Information contained in such publications is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The information contained in such publications is not intended to constitute individual investment advice and is not designed to meet your personal financial situation. The opinions expressed in such publications are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. The information in such publications may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. You are advised to discuss with your financial advisers your investment options and whether any investment is suitable for your specific needs prior to making any investments.
John Mauldin, Mauldin Economics, LLC and other entities in which he has an interest, employees, officers, family, and associates may from time to time have positions in the securities or commodities covered in these publications or web site. Corporate policies are in effect that attempt to avoid potential conflicts of interest and resolve conflicts of interest that do arise in a timely fashion.
Mauldin Economics, LLC reserves the right to cancel any subscription at any time, and if it does so it will promptly refund to the subscriber the amount of the subscription payment previously received relating to the remaining subscription period. Cancellation of a subscription may result from any unauthorized use or reproduction or rebroadcast of any Mauldin Economics publication or website, any infringement or misappropriation of Mauldin Economics, LLC’s proprietary rights, or any other reason determined in the sole discretion of Mauldin Economics, LLC.

Affiliate Notice

Mauldin Economics has affiliate agreements in place that may include fee sharing. If you have a website or newsletter and would like to be considered for inclusion in the Mauldin Economics affiliate program, please go to http://affiliates.ggcpublishing.com/. Likewise, from time to time Mauldin Economics may engage in affiliate programs offered by other companies, though corporate policy firmly dictates that such agreements will have no influence on any product or service recommendations, nor alter the pricing that would otherwise be available in absence of such an agreement. As always, it is important that you do your own due diligence before transacting any business with any firm, for any product or service.

© Copyright 2019 Mauldin Economics