Toll-free: (877) 631-6311 | Local: (602) 626-3100 |
Office Open
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
The Evidence Is Piling Up

The Evidence Is Piling Up


I have been a bond bear for a while. Back in the summer of 2016, I spoke at a small conference out in San Diego. My topic: how interest rates were going to go up.

It didn’t go over very well with people.

One guy in the front row got really upset, and started sputtering about how I was totally wrong. He seemed pretty angry. I was actually a bit scared. I’ve been to some conferences where people were scratchy, but I never before thought I was going to get my ass kicked.

I haven’t been invited back to speak, which is too bad—because I was right.

When I gave that talk, yields on 10 year notes were about 1.6%. Today they are about 2.4%. That may not seem like a lot, but it is.

The evidence is starting to pile up that yields may be going even higher.

Quantitative Tightening

As you know by now, the Fed is letting assets roll off the balance sheet. A little at first, but more later. This is not a small thing! New Fed Chairman Jay Powell wants this to be smooth as a gravy sandwich, but let’s see how it plays out before we take any victory laps.

Meanwhile, the ECB is tapering, and will taper more…

The BOJ has pegged the yield curve and buys bonds when the market forces them into it…

The Bank of England seems to be finally lifting off…

What had once been a flood of global liquidity is now starting to run in reverse.

So, if you remember all the complaints about central banks, that:

1) They had inflated asset prices

2) And worsened inequality

Then you can expect:

1) Asset prices to deflate

2) And rich people to get poorer

This is what you have been waiting for, right? Rich people to lose money?

Thousands of investors have picked Jared Dillian’s ETF 20/20. Want In? Join Now for just $79 per year.

Rich people will lose money because asset prices will deflate. What kind of assets? Financial assets—stocks and bonds.

Yes, in the next bear market, stocks and bonds will likely go down together.

People have become accustomed to an inverse relationship between stock and bond prices. Funny thing about stock-bond correlation. The long-term average is zero. But sometimes it is 1, and sometimes it is -1.

There are a lot of people holding 70/30 or 60/40 portfolios of stocks and bonds, thinking they are diversified. They are probably not diversified. To be diversified today, you need to be a bit more imaginative about what asset classes you include in your portfolio—and have a healthy dose of cash (we talk a lot about portfolio construction in ETF 20/20).

Anyway, a pretty good leading indicator of asset prices deflating and rich people getting poor is Sotheby’s, the auction house. Quantitative easing didn’t just fluff up stocks and bonds, it fluffed up art and crap as well.

The chart is making lower highs. We might be onto something.

FANG and Bitcoin

The Chicago Mercantile Exchange is listing futures on FANG and bitcoin. You probably heard. And when I say FANG, I mean a small basket of stocks including Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, and Google.

Most people would objectively say that FANG and bitcoin are bubbles. There might be some disagreement, but not much.

The CME is getting pretty far away from its mission of providing a mechanism for managing or mitigating price risks in commodities. These products are purely for speculation. We’re not even sure that bitcoin serves any economic purpose.

Let’s look at the history of listing derivatives on bubbles. The listing of ABX led to the destruction of the subprime mortgage market. The listing of CMBX led to the destruction of commercial mortgage-backed securities. Heck, even the Nikkei futures were listed right near the top of Japan, in 1989. And lots of people think that tulip futures are what did the tulips in.

I was talking with a good friend the other day, a bond salesman who has been around for a while. He is fifty, and has quite a bit of grey in his beard. We were talking about how cool it was that 1 year Treasury bills yielded almost 1.5%, and how you can get 1.5% in an online savings account.

I said to him, are you listening to us? We’re talking about T-bills. Nobody talks about T-bills. But in 1981, everyone was talking about T-bills.

We will get back there eventually.

Did someone forward this article to you?

Click here to get The 10th Man in your inbox every Thursday.


Discussion

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

0 comments

onebeastwon@msn.com
Nov. 9, 2017, 10:29 a.m.

What I wonder is if economic growth ... or rather, lack of same ... in the US will be sufficient to drive rates higher.  Despite prospective fiscal stimulus, significant headwinds such as demographics (the oft cited 10K turning 65 every day), automation and consumer debt may keep growth in the 2% +/- range. In addition, headline #‘s aside, there is slack in the employment data and this is reinforced by very slow wage growth.  Thus, I am open minded but inclined to think that a big surge in rates is unlikely.  No axe to grind here; zero exposure to bonds.

The 10th Man

Fundamental investing and technical analysis are vulnerable to human behaviour—but human behaviour itself is utterly predictable and governments' actions even more so.

Read Latest Edition Now

What you always wanted to know about investing, but that you didn’t know to ask

Get Jared Dillian's The 10th Man

Free in your inbox every Thursday

Privacy Policy

Get in Touch

PO Box 192495,
Dallas, Texas 75219

Toll-free: (877) 631-6311
Local: (602) 626-3100

Copyright © 2020 Mauldin Economics, LLC. All rights reserved.
×
The 10th Man

Wait! Don't leave without...

Jared Dillian's The 10th Man

Instinct and financial experience combined by a former Wall Street trader and served in one of the industry's most original, entertaining, contrarian voices. Get this free newsletter in your inbox every Thursday!