The 10th Man

Whip Deflation Now

February 11, 2016

The title, of course, is a reference to the Ford administration’s Whip Inflation Now campaign (with buttons).

Central banks have been trying to Whip Deflation Now, but WDN is not as good an acronym.

Japan went to negative rates, so there is lots of talk about how low these negative rates can go.

This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.

Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with this must-read report from Jared Dillian.

In the case of Japan, the rate cut turned out to be completely counterproductive, as USDJPY actually traded lower, so many people think Japan is stuck.

Japan is not stuck. Keep in mind that Japan is where unconventional monetary policy was born. They can do all sorts of things. They can cut rates to negative 1%. Or negative 2%. Or do something called OMT (Outright Monetary Transactions). Try to keep up with the acronyms. Look it up.

And since everyone is trying to competitively devalue, it is a race to the bottom in interest rates. Could get even weirder.

Also, it is unlikely that the Fed hikes again this year. 

$6 trillion of global bonds now are trading with negative yields. Just let that sink in for a bit.

Source: FT

Inflation Is Back

The funny thing is, it is possible that deflation has already been whipped. We are starting to see signs of inflation in the pipeline.

The Fed is dumb but not unintelligent, if that makes any sense. They have 250 economists crunching numbers. They know when inflation is coming. Why do you think they wanted to raise rates four times this year?

Because of stuff like this:

Source: DB

As you can see, wage expectations are starting to pick up. No surprise, after we heard about all of those minimum wage hikes last year—as usual, the market is self-correcting. Low wages is the cure for low wages. The market just doesn’t operate on anybody’s schedule.

We could see inflation of 3-4% in a couple of years.  Now, even the most novice investor can understand that owning a bond with a negative yield in a high inflation environment is the most nonsensical thing ever.

What I am saying is that the bond market is sowing the seeds of its own destruction. It is a bubble. High bond prices will be the cure for high bond prices, when the market gets around to it.

Of course, if you like inflation, then you like gold:

And you like iron ore:

And anything else that will hurt if you drop it on your foot.

In contrast, the fluff with fluffy subjective valuations is getting hammered:

This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.

Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with The 5 ETF Trading Strategies You Should Know About Before Investing, from Jared Dillian.

I know I’m throwing a bunch of charts around, but there’s actually something to this. If you buy Amazon, it is an implicit deflation bet. You are betting on the deflationary forces of technology, that prices will continue lower.

Since 2011, Amazon (and all that stuff) has been going higher.

Since 2011, metals and commodities and EM have been going lower.

Suddenly, three weeks ago… these trends abruptly reversed.

My thesis is that the deflation trade is over. The inflation trade has just begun.

Which means: don’t buy AMZN, and don’t short gold. This is the first inning.

Call Me Crazy

I have gotten some pushback on this thesis. The deflationary mentality is pretty entrenched. For now, the inflation is imaginary. But don’t you think it’s weird that gold, iron ore, steel rebar, and copper are rallying in the middle of what might be a bear market?

I think it’s weird.

As usual, the market is doing what nobody expected to happen.  Nobody is positioned for an inflation trade. Some well-known market pundits and economists have been talking down emerging markets for years. They haven’t stopped. The thing about most people is, they always miss the turn because the bearish thesis is most compelling on the lows. And they are blind to evidence that contradicts their thesis.

All of this could be coincidence. I could be nuts. Wouldn’t be the first time.

But I have always believed that the inflation trade from 2000 to 2011 was the motive wave, and the correction from 2011 to 2016 was the corrective wave, and now we are back on the primary trend, in an inflation bull market lasting 25 years or more.

I told you I think really big picture.

Jared Dillian
Jared Dillian


Get Thought-Provoking Contrarian
Insights from Jared Dillian

Discuss This


We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.


Feb. 11, 2016, 1:04 p.m.

Well, this is an interesting thought.  But I don’t believe the Fed raised to fight expected inflation.

Rather, they raised to give savers a break.  All the QE’s were designed to save the banks.  At the expense of savers.  That obviously has hurt spending, and its now coming home to roost.

They had/have to raise to goose spending.  Too late.  But I will keep an eye on materials.

Use of this content, the Mauldin Economics website, and related sites and applications is provided under the Mauldin Economics Terms & Conditions of Use.

Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited

The information provided in this publication is private, privileged, and confidential information, licensed for your sole individual use as a subscriber. Mauldin Economics reserves all rights to the content of this publication and related materials. Forwarding, copying, disseminating, or distributing this report in whole or in part, including substantial quotation of any portion the publication or any release of specific investment recommendations, is strictly prohibited.
Participation in such activity is grounds for immediate termination of all subscriptions of registered subscribers deemed to be involved at Mauldin Economics’ sole discretion, may violate the copyright laws of the United States, and may subject the violator to legal prosecution. Mauldin Economics reserves the right to monitor the use of this publication without disclosure by any electronic means it deems necessary and may change those means without notice at any time. If you have received this publication and are not the intended subscriber, please contact


The Mauldin Economics website, Thoughts from the Frontline, The Weekly Profit, The 10th Man, Connecting the Dots, Transformational Technology Digest, Over My Shoulder, Yield Shark, Transformational Technology Alert, Rational Bear, Street Freak, ETF 20/20, In the Money, and Mauldin Economics VIP are published by Mauldin Economics, LLC Information contained in such publications is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The information contained in such publications is not intended to constitute individual investment advice and is not designed to meet your personal financial situation. The opinions expressed in such publications are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. The information in such publications may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. You are advised to discuss with your financial advisers your investment options and whether any investment is suitable for your specific needs prior to making any investments.
John Mauldin, Mauldin Economics, LLC and other entities in which he has an interest, employees, officers, family, and associates may from time to time have positions in the securities or commodities covered in these publications or web site. Corporate policies are in effect that attempt to avoid potential conflicts of interest and resolve conflicts of interest that do arise in a timely fashion.
Mauldin Economics, LLC reserves the right to cancel any subscription at any time, and if it does so it will promptly refund to the subscriber the amount of the subscription payment previously received relating to the remaining subscription period. Cancellation of a subscription may result from any unauthorized use or reproduction or rebroadcast of any Mauldin Economics publication or website, any infringement or misappropriation of Mauldin Economics, LLC’s proprietary rights, or any other reason determined in the sole discretion of Mauldin Economics, LLC.

Affiliate Notice

Mauldin Economics has affiliate agreements in place that may include fee sharing. If you have a website or newsletter and would like to be considered for inclusion in the Mauldin Economics affiliate program, please go to Likewise, from time to time Mauldin Economics may engage in affiliate programs offered by other companies, though corporate policy firmly dictates that such agreements will have no influence on any product or service recommendations, nor alter the pricing that would otherwise be available in absence of such an agreement. As always, it is important that you do your own due diligence before transacting any business with any firm, for any product or service.

© Copyright 2019 Mauldin Economics