Before we start this week’s issue, a brief announcement.
I’m holding a call just for The 10th Man readers next week. We’re calling it The 10th Man 5: 5 Things That Could Freak Your Portfolio Out in 2019.
This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.
Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with this must-read report from Jared Dillian.
They’re probably not going to be factors you would guess—it’s my own personal list, not one you would see anywhere else. And they’re factors that could have a sneaky impact on your portfolio before you even realize it. Lots to talk about!
Access to this call is pretty cheap (it’s free). And you don’t have to do anything to access it. I’ll email you a link to listen on Tuesday, March 12. So check your inbox… you’re not going to want to miss it.
Back to Retirement
How much money do you need to retire? Ask the Google monster!
Page one of the results gives you a wide range of numbers, mostly between $1 million and $2 million. Of course, most people retire with less than that. They make it work.
Stop trying to think about retirement in terms of absolute numbers. It is all relative.
One of my longtime readers, Neile Wolfe, of Wells Fargo Advisors in Austin, TX has an elegant solution to the problem. Neile is a fellow divergent thinker and is, hands down, the most thoughtful advisor I have ever met. Look him up.
Here is the heuristic:
- Take the market value of your house—and multiply by .3. That is the income you need in retirement.
- Take that number, and divide by .04. That will give you the assets you need to retire with.
Let’s do an example.
Let’s say you are fairly well-to-do, and you live in a house whose market value is $1.4 million. Not what you paid for it—the current market value. You can look it up on Zillow if you’re really stumped, but my guess is you have a good idea what your house is worth.
So take $1.4 million, and multiply by .3, which gives you $420,000. That is the income you are going to need in retirement.
You probably think that number is high, and that you can get by on less than $420,000. Let me tell you why you can’t.
First of all, $1.4 million houses are expensive to maintain. It will cost you, on average, 1-2% every year. 0% some years, and 5-6% other years. But that is the least of your problems.
If you live in a $1.4 million house, you live in a pretty nice neighborhood. Those houses have pretty nice cars in front of them, and so will yours. Maybe you think you will have an old rustbucket sitting in front of your $1.4 million house. Then you will be that guy.
If you are living in a $1.4 million house, you are not buying your clothes at Old Navy. You are not getting your furniture from Bob’s Discount Furniture. You are not getting your jewelry from Kay1. You are not getting your groceries from Wal-Mart—you are going to Whole Paycheck.
This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.
Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with The 5 ETF Trading Strategies You Should Know About Before Investing, from Jared Dillian.
If you really want to spend less money, get a smaller house!
Funny thing about those FIRE people living in tiny houses. They are right about one thing—they know that the house drives the spending, so they live in the smallest house possible. You and I aren’t willing to make those sacrifices.
The house is everything. This is why people downsize when they retire. It isn’t really about needing less space. It’s about taking down your spending.
Wait—it gets even better.
The 4% Rule
You have probably heard of the 4% rule. It says you can safely withdraw 4% from your retirement savings annually during retirement. So if you have $1 million, you can take out $40,000 a year. Simple enough.
Let’s go back to the example above. You live in a $1.4 million house and you need $420,000 to live on in retirement. How much savings do you need?
$420,000 divided by .04 = $10,500,000.
You will need over ten million in savings. That’s a lot!
You wouldn’t need ten million in savings if you had a cheaper house. If you downsized into a $300,000 house, you would need $90,000 in income, and $2,250,000 in savings, which sounds about right.
The house drives everything. The house drives everything. The house drives everything.
Do the math with your own house. Or if you don’t own a house, use the market value of whatever property you’re renting.
If the numbers don’t line up, you’re probably going to have to make some adjustments.
It’s the Better Way
Imagine saving for retirement and thinking you have enough… and then you don’t have enough.
It’s good to think of retirement savings as a moving target than a fixed amount. And you’re in control of it!
My friend Neile also points out that assets like planes, boats, and second homes all require their own stream of income and should be included in the calculations.
And don’t forget: check your inbox on Tuesday, March 12 for access to The 10th Man 5: 5 Things That Could Freak Your Portfolio Out in 2019.
1 More kisses begin with Miller Lite than begin with Kay.