The 10th Man

Karmically Speaking

October 4, 2018

Let’s explore one of the most sensitive subjects in personal finance:

Charitable giving.

This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.

Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with this must-read report from Jared Dillian.

What people give to charity and who they give it to provokes intense personal feeling. I am not going to tell anybody what to give and who to give it to. I have one message to get across here, and I am going to save it for the second half of this piece.

If I were running for president, and you got a hold of my tax returns, you might say that I do not give very much to charity. Relative to most people running for president, I probably give a bit less. Relative to the rest of the population, I am probably average or a bit below average.

For years, I have given heavily to my high school and the gifted and talented camp where I met my wife. In middle age, I am rethinking my charitable giving. My high school seems to be going a direction I don’t entirely agree with, and frankly, the gifted and talented camp doesn’t need my money—especially when you consider who some of its alumni are.

So I have been thinking long and hard about what causes I really care about. If I am being honest with myself, I care about animal welfare programs more than anything else. My wife and I have said that if we won the lottery, we would Google every cat rescue and cat shelter in the country, and start mailing out $10,000 checks.

Nonetheless, my wife and I have the gifted and talented camp in our will. If we get greased by a cement truck, the gifted and talented camp is going to get a big slug of money.

I am not currently a member of a church. For years, I attended Episcopalian services, but I discovered that the South Carolina brand of Episcopalianism was a bit different from the Connecticut brand of Episcopalianism, and I was turned off by it. Probably just cultural differences.

My mortgage payment is pretty small and property taxes around here are cheap. I do not have a high cost of carry. Plenty of free cash flow to give to charity.

But I don’t. Why not? Am I a CF?

The Magic of Compounding

Lots of people out there (perhaps reading this newsletter) give 10% or more of their income to charity. That makes me uncomfortable, for the following reason:

It’s good to give some now, but you can give more later if you invest it and let it compound.

Listen to me carefully: we all like to do good in the world. It feels good to do good now, but if you wait, you can do even more good later. A form of delayed gratification, if you will.

Examples of this abound. Like Warren Buffett, who in his nine decades hasn’t donated much (relative to what he makes). But he’s going to give it all away in a giant lump sum at the end.

Bezos is doing something similar. Earlier this year, he sold a significant chunk of stock for the first time ever to give to charity. But not until he was already worth $150 billion.

In my career, I have run into people who are generous to a fault. They give so much, there is not much left to invest. They don’t care, because this is what they want to do.

It is difficult to explain compounding to these people. Generally, I don’t try.

This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.

Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with The 5 ETF Trading Strategies You Should Know About Before Investing, from Jared Dillian.

Most people give heavily during their peak earnings years, when they should be accumulating wealth. And then there is not much to give at the end, when they should be decumulating wealth. What is left usually goes to the kids.

I think it is better to give more sparingly during your peak earnings years, invest wisely, then give it all away at the end, like Warren Buffett.

My wife and I plan on flying first class plenty when we are in our 70s, but trust me, there are going to be some happy cats out there when we pass.

Give the Gift of Time

I have always thought that giving money is a poor substitute for giving time. Giving time is better than giving money. Getting personally involved in your charity is where it’s at. I have always been a bit uncomfortable with writing a check and absolving myself of further responsibility.

For someone like me, a man who has money but has no time, time is way more precious and valuable than money. It is the most valuable commodity.

Last week, a pilot friend of mine wrote me about teaming up to participate in a charity that transports animals by plane from crowded shelters (where there is no demand) to empty shelters (where there is high demand). We’re going to see if we can make it happen. I can spare a Saturday to save 10 cats.

Point is, there are a lot of different ways to be generous. Let’s try to be smarter about it.

Jared Dillian
Jared Dillian

 

Get Thought-Provoking Contrarian
Insights from Jared Dillian

Discuss This

0 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

Wayne Smith III

Oct. 9, 12:31 p.m.

Interesting article - thanks.  However, the Apostle Paul said in Philippians 4:16-18 “for even in Thessalonica you sent a gift more than once for my needs. Not that I seek the gift itself, but I seek for the profit which increases to your account. But I have received everything in full and have an abundance; I am amply supplied, having received from Epaphroditus what you have sent, a fragrant aroma, an acceptable sacrifice, well-pleasing to God.”  What Paul is saying is that when we give, we are in effect laying up treasures in heaven, for us to enjoy for all eternity.  I doubt that giving money away at ones death will count for anything for the giver.  They are saying, God, since I am now dead, I have no need for this anymore, so you can have it.”  I doubt God is tickled by such generosity.  I am confident that Bezos and Buffett, assuming they get to heaven, will be working for the widow that gave her only two mites!

Kishore Sakhrani

Oct. 8, 11:22 p.m.

“It’s good to give some now, but you can give more later if you invest it and let it compound.”

Your comment only makes sense if the goal is to maximize the amount available for donation but that’s only one side of the equation.  What would you do if you knew that the donation you give now would be able to alter the trajectory of a kid’s life, or even if it saves a life. In both instances, the ‘benefit’ is long term and continuous, and most likely, would exceed the benefits of compounding.

Unless you’re a Bezos, Buffett or Gates, where your charitable giving could move the needle on a global issue, delaying a donation now doesn’t make a lot of sense.  Just because you can’t easily measure the benefits of a current donation to a charity doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

dwisehart@gmail.com

Oct. 8, 7:04 p.m.

Sorry if this is a dupe posting: I was not logged in the first time.

You make an interesting point, as always, Jared.  My view is:  The reason to give now is that I want to change the world I live in now.  I want to reap some of the benefits of making the world a better place while I am still alive.  You are right: the world would benefit more if I waited to give until after I am gone, but frankly, I don’t care.  I want to enjoy the better world while I am still here to enjoy it.  My descendants will have to make the world better for themselves.

Thanks, as always, for telling it as you see it,
Daniel

John Porter

Oct. 8, 6:23 p.m.

Jared: I just can’t add to Joe Kimball’s comments other than to say “hear, hear”. You cannot outgive the Lord. I shudder to think about the families, the children, their educations that we benefit if my wife and I were to save it all up and give at death. Love you as much as always and that’s why I share this truth. Give sacrificially. It will change your life.

leighton naff

Oct. 8, 4 p.m.

Agree to a point.  Smaller charities and their recipients can use the donations immediately and sometimes, the donations keep them on their feet as they grow. Specifically you mentioned animal charities and I can think of two I have helped over the years that you can really see your dollars at work. Down the road (40 yrs) the trust can do it’s work.

Thanks

leswt@aol.com

Oct. 8, 3:53 p.m.

Jared,
As you say, you need to be involved with what you want, not what others want.  With that said, we are cat people, but we donate to those charities that deal with people—-especially young people.  To each his own.  Like you, I did not contribute much when I was younger, other than some of my time.  As our earnings grew, we began to donate and also created a charitable trust (actually took a large bonus I received and put it into the charitable trust).  It grew over time, allowing us to make donations from it towards the end of my career, and, better yet, we have been able to keep our level of giving since my retirement without impacting the initial investment balance—-of course, a market correction could impact that.  This approach is sort of a balance between giving while earning and letting money grow in an investment.  Unlike the recent Bloomberg article on Charitable Trusts and abuse by the wealthy, they’re also a good instrument for those who aren’t exactly wealthy.  I enjoy your articles from your view of the world.  Les

Susan Middleton

Oct. 8, 3:16 p.m.

I’d like to think that giving now also can compound.  If your donation helps someone become a more productive citizen than they would otherwise be, isn’t that a form of compounding?

Peter Hansen

Oct. 8, 2:42 p.m.

Agree wholeheatedly about animal welfare, but suggest you give priority to wild animals over domestic pets. Wild animals are disappearing at a fast rate, while we will always have domestic pets.

As far as the value of giving now, versus letting your capital compound over time until the end, consider the time value of wild environments which are decapitalizing (vanishing) at an increasing rate. A $ invested today may be worth $10 ten years from now. Think of orangatangs in Borneo, elephants in Africa, tigers in India, macaws in the Amazon, etc. If we don’t act to preserve wild spaces now, there will be little left to show your grandchildren.

st-trom@telkomsa.net

Oct. 8, 2:33 p.m.

Now I get your comments about family (3rd May). You love cats. What are the names of your cats? I love cats. I have four myself. There are many cats in Africa who need your help today. Don’t delay. Oh, & please send pics of your feline family.

Sixty2nds@yahoo.com

Oct. 7, 11:52 a.m.

Give now?
Give later?


My wife and I choose to give now.

Why now?

There is “need” now.

There will be “need” in the future as well.

The point is to Give.

 

 


Use of this content, the Mauldin Economics website, and related sites and applications is provided under the Mauldin Economics Terms & Conditions of Use.

Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited

The information provided in this publication is private, privileged, and confidential information, licensed for your sole individual use as a subscriber. Mauldin Economics reserves all rights to the content of this publication and related materials. Forwarding, copying, disseminating, or distributing this report in whole or in part, including substantial quotation of any portion the publication or any release of specific investment recommendations, is strictly prohibited.
Participation in such activity is grounds for immediate termination of all subscriptions of registered subscribers deemed to be involved at Mauldin Economics’ sole discretion, may violate the copyright laws of the United States, and may subject the violator to legal prosecution. Mauldin Economics reserves the right to monitor the use of this publication without disclosure by any electronic means it deems necessary and may change those means without notice at any time. If you have received this publication and are not the intended subscriber, please contact service@mauldineconomics.com.

Disclaimers

The Mauldin Economics website, Thoughts from the Frontline, The Weekly Profit, The 10th Man, Connecting the Dots, Transformational Technology Digest, Over My Shoulder, Yield Shark, Transformational Technology Alert, Rational Bear, Street Freak, ETF 20/20, In the Money, and Mauldin Economics VIP are published by Mauldin Economics, LLC Information contained in such publications is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The information contained in such publications is not intended to constitute individual investment advice and is not designed to meet your personal financial situation. The opinions expressed in such publications are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. The information in such publications may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. You are advised to discuss with your financial advisers your investment options and whether any investment is suitable for your specific needs prior to making any investments.
John Mauldin, Mauldin Economics, LLC and other entities in which he has an interest, employees, officers, family, and associates may from time to time have positions in the securities or commodities covered in these publications or web site. Corporate policies are in effect that attempt to avoid potential conflicts of interest and resolve conflicts of interest that do arise in a timely fashion.
Mauldin Economics, LLC reserves the right to cancel any subscription at any time, and if it does so it will promptly refund to the subscriber the amount of the subscription payment previously received relating to the remaining subscription period. Cancellation of a subscription may result from any unauthorized use or reproduction or rebroadcast of any Mauldin Economics publication or website, any infringement or misappropriation of Mauldin Economics, LLC’s proprietary rights, or any other reason determined in the sole discretion of Mauldin Economics, LLC.

Affiliate Notice

Mauldin Economics has affiliate agreements in place that may include fee sharing. If you have a website or newsletter and would like to be considered for inclusion in the Mauldin Economics affiliate program, please go to http://affiliates.ggcpublishing.com/. Likewise, from time to time Mauldin Economics may engage in affiliate programs offered by other companies, though corporate policy firmly dictates that such agreements will have no influence on any product or service recommendations, nor alter the pricing that would otherwise be available in absence of such an agreement. As always, it is important that you do your own due diligence before transacting any business with any firm, for any product or service.

© Copyright 2018 Mauldin Economics