I wrote last week about the huge amount of money Americans spend on healthcare. Many people simply can’t afford to get the care they need.
But why is healthcare so expensive here?
High prices are a consequence of supply and demand. Artificially reduced supply will make things more expensive. One way to make prices drop is to ease the constraints and increase the supply.
Healthcare and trade protectionism seem like two different problems, but here’s where they overlap.
Theoretically, if additional supply doesn’t exist domestically, you can import it. But the US severely restricts imports of the most important healthcare resource. Changing this policy might make a huge difference and save lives.
Photo: Getty Images
Not Enough Gates
Reader Mitchell Fitzhenry responded to last week’s article with this kind note on Twitter:
Patrick, I sometimes find myself disagreeing with some of your opinions. John Mauldin might even disagree at times with you. However, this is a GREAT article; next, maybe you can write another one with some incremental solutions. Healthcare solutions need an independent voice.
Thank you, Mitchell. I like your phrase, “incremental solutions.” As a macro analyst, I usually look for big, global answers, but small steps matter.
So, let’s talk about one.
Imagine you’re at a crowded concert or football game. You must enter through a limited number of gates. Everyone arrives at about the same time. There’s congestion outside, but everyone has a chair once they get in.
That’s sort of how the healthcare system works. We have plenty of resources to meet the demand, but you have to squeeze through a gate to reach them... and physicians are the gatekeepers.
Very little happens in our healthcare system until doctor orders it. While there are good reasons for that, it still creates bottlenecks and raises costs.
One way to fix this is to install express gates manned by physician proxies—nurse practitioners and the like—for more routine matters. That’s happening already, but the less-knowledgeable proxies can’t do as much.
We can also automate some physician functions with surgical robots and AI-assisted diagnosis. But again, it’s only a partial answer.
The only full solution is to increase the supply of physicians, which would reduce costs and ease those bottlenecks. But the US only has so many medical schools that can produce only so many graduates. We don’t want to lower standards. So what to do?
Photo: Getty Images
Free Trade in Doctors
If this were any other economic good, the answer would be obvious: import same-quality substitutes. Physicians from other countries might like to work in the US... and we could pay them well.
Why don’t they come here?
One reason is that all 50 states require that physicians complete a multi-year, US-based hospital residency program before receiving a medical license. This isn’t attractive if you already endured similar training in, say, Australia or Japan.
Like other occupational licensing laws, the medical residency requirement is a non-tariff trade barrier. By restricting supply, it reduces competition and raises prices for US consumers.
This is why protectionism is so harmful. It may seem to have short-term benefits, but in the end, everyone pays more and gets less, no matter what the particular good or service.
Allowing free trade in physicians would do two things for us:
- Healthcare quality would rise as patients made it through the gates faster. Presently, many see their conditions worsen as they wait to see a physician.
- Prices would fall. Physician services are expensive because, among other reasons, there is so little competition. Allowing more of it should increase supply and make prices drop.
Now, if you are a physician, you probably don’t like that last part. Neither did millions of former manufacturing workers. We (meaning the rest of the country) didn’t do enough to help them face foreign competition. We shouldn’t make that mistake again.
But the healthcare costs we are imposing on ourselves are unsustainable and, left unchecked, will eventually cause even greater harm to everyone.
Photo: Getty Images
Worth a Try
I’ve made this sound simple, but as a practical matter, it’s not.
It will require changes in both state and federal policy. States would have to modify their physician licensing laws, and the federal government would have to grant visas to let more immigrant physicians work in the US. Both will be politically hard.
Furthermore, it’s not clear how many qualified physicians from other countries want to work in the US, even if we removed the barriers. They might rather stay home.
We have other challenges, too, like high medical school costs and a legal system that forces doctors to buy expensive liability insurance.
Free trade in doctors won’t solve all our problems… but it would be (as the drug commercials say) more effective than a placebo. So I think it’s worth a try.
See you at the top,
Senior Economic Analyst Patrick Watson is a master in connecting the dots and finding out where budding trends are leading. Patrick has partnered with John Mauldin as the co-editor of Mauldin Economics’ premium research service, Over My Shoulder. Together, they curate research and analysis from the world’s finest thinkers, and deliver it to subscribers 3–4 times per week. You can also follow him on Twitter (@PatrickW) to see his commentary on current events.