Connecting the Dots

The Worst Parts of MMT Are Already Here

March 5, 2019

Many Americans are worried about “modern monetary theory.” They fear a future Congress will use it to justify sharply higher spending and enlarge the national debt to unsustainable levels.

That may well be the case, but most seem unaware these dreadful things are already happening.

Forget what a future Congress might do. Today’s Congress has already enlarged the national debt to unsustainable levels. 

True, they aren’t using MMT to justify their actions, and it’s mostly a different kind of spending than MMT proponents want. But the budgetary impact is the same.

If the national debt is your concern, you might want to think about the here-and-now instead of future threats that may never happen.

Photo: Flickr

How to Go Bankrupt

First, a little note: I won’t have a column next week because I will be busy covering the SXSW Interactive Conference in Austin. You can follow me on Twitter (@PatrickW) for updates. Now on with today’s topic.

If your goal were to expand the national debt, you would do three things.

  • Increase federal spending
  • Reduce tax revenue
  • Raise interest rates

Those are what MMT detractors say will happen if liberal Democrats ever take control of Congress and the White House.

  • Nationalized healthcare, a “Green New Deal,” and expanded social programs will increase government spending.
  • Higher tax rates on the wealthy will drive capital overseas, causing stagnant or lower tax revenue.
  • The “crowding out” effect of more deficit spending will push interest rates higher, raising the government’s financing costs.

You could argue whether those are actually correct, or if MMT-inspired policies would cause them. But today I have a different point…

All these supposedly terrible things are already happening even without MMT.

Spending is way up even without the Green New Deal. Tax revenue has flattened.  Interest rates are significantly higher than they were two years ago.

These factors are all combining to push the national debt higher. So if you think that’s a problem, the time to worry about it is now, not later.


Going, Going, Almost Gone...

SIC 2019

Is Almost Sold Out!

Reserve your seat today before they're gone »

Rising Deficits

I realize this may be hard to believe, so let’s go to the scoreboard.

The table below compares federal revenue and spending for fiscal year 2018 with FY 2017. Note that it includes both payroll taxes and Social Security benefits.

Chart: CRFB

In just one fiscal year, federal spending rose 3.2% while revenue rose only 0.4%. That may not seem like a huge difference, but it added up to a 17% higher deficit.

Looking deeper, the culprits aren’t hard to spot. On the revenue side, corporate tax revenue plunged 30.9%, or $92 billion. That was due to the big tax cut passed in December 2017.

On the expenses side, defense spending rose more than Social Security even though the Baby Boomers are now retiring in droves.

But the real jump was in interest on the debt, which climbed 23.6%. Other categories of federal spending actually fell slightly.

The national debt—not counting unfunded liabilities like pension programs—passed $22 trillion last month. At the end of FY 2016, it was $19.6 trillion. So the debt has grown more than 12% in the last two fiscal years.

MMT advocates aren’t doing this. They might do no better (and possibly worse) if they gain power, but it’s not like everything is swell right now.

Photo: Pixabay

MMT Isn’t Doing This

There are explanations for those dismal numbers. The corporate tax cut is supposed to stimulate the economy and eventually raise tax revenue. Maybe it will, but it hasn’t yet.

It’s also true the Fed may stop hiking short-term interest rates and even reduce them. That would help the government’s borrowing costs. But again, it’s just a guess at this point.

Meanwhile, the economic expansion is growing old. Many experts expect a recession in the next year or two. Even a mild recession will reduce tax revenue and raise spending even more than is happening now.

This is not a sustainable situation, and it isn’t the fault of MMT, or socialists, or crazy left-wingers. None of those groups have had any power recently.

Whether MMT advocates would do any better is a different question. Maybe they wouldn’t. But they aren’t the ones creating more debt, at least for now.

Someone else did that.

See you at the top,

Patrick Watson

Discuss This

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.


There are no comments at this time.

Use of this content, the Mauldin Economics website, and related sites and applications is provided under the Mauldin Economics Terms & Conditions of Use.

Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited

The information provided in this publication is private, privileged, and confidential information, licensed for your sole individual use as a subscriber. Mauldin Economics reserves all rights to the content of this publication and related materials. Forwarding, copying, disseminating, or distributing this report in whole or in part, including substantial quotation of any portion the publication or any release of specific investment recommendations, is strictly prohibited.
Participation in such activity is grounds for immediate termination of all subscriptions of registered subscribers deemed to be involved at Mauldin Economics’ sole discretion, may violate the copyright laws of the United States, and may subject the violator to legal prosecution. Mauldin Economics reserves the right to monitor the use of this publication without disclosure by any electronic means it deems necessary and may change those means without notice at any time. If you have received this publication and are not the intended subscriber, please contact


The Mauldin Economics website, Thoughts from the Frontline, The Weekly Profit, The 10th Man, Connecting the Dots, Transformational Technology Digest, Over My Shoulder, Yield Shark, Transformational Technology Alert, Rational Bear, Street Freak, ETF 20/20, In the Money, and Mauldin Economics VIP are published by Mauldin Economics, LLC Information contained in such publications is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The information contained in such publications is not intended to constitute individual investment advice and is not designed to meet your personal financial situation. The opinions expressed in such publications are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. The information in such publications may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. You are advised to discuss with your financial advisers your investment options and whether any investment is suitable for your specific needs prior to making any investments.
John Mauldin, Mauldin Economics, LLC and other entities in which he has an interest, employees, officers, family, and associates may from time to time have positions in the securities or commodities covered in these publications or web site. Corporate policies are in effect that attempt to avoid potential conflicts of interest and resolve conflicts of interest that do arise in a timely fashion.
Mauldin Economics, LLC reserves the right to cancel any subscription at any time, and if it does so it will promptly refund to the subscriber the amount of the subscription payment previously received relating to the remaining subscription period. Cancellation of a subscription may result from any unauthorized use or reproduction or rebroadcast of any Mauldin Economics publication or website, any infringement or misappropriation of Mauldin Economics, LLC’s proprietary rights, or any other reason determined in the sole discretion of Mauldin Economics, LLC.

Affiliate Notice

Mauldin Economics has affiliate agreements in place that may include fee sharing. If you have a website or newsletter and would like to be considered for inclusion in the Mauldin Economics affiliate program, please go to Likewise, from time to time Mauldin Economics may engage in affiliate programs offered by other companies, though corporate policy firmly dictates that such agreements will have no influence on any product or service recommendations, nor alter the pricing that would otherwise be available in absence of such an agreement. As always, it is important that you do your own due diligence before transacting any business with any firm, for any product or service.

© Copyright 2019 Mauldin Economics