Connecting the Dots

Face It: Social Security Is Welfare

July 3, 2018

According to the dictionary, “welfare” is a word that describes our health, happiness, and fortunes. But in the US, it usually refers to government support, which many consider shameful. No one wants to be “on” welfare.

But in fact, almost all of us are on welfare… or will be eventually. That’s because most Americans will someday reach retirement age and collect Social Security benefits… and Social Security is welfare.

About half of you reading this are flipping out right now. How dare he say that? That’s my money! I earned every penny of it!

Photo: Getty Images

I’m sorry, but no, you didn’t earn it—at least not all of it. Social Security benefits are a gift from other taxpayers. It’s not simply your own money coming back to you.

That may be hard to accept, but it’s important. Recognizing it should change your financial decisions. Yet almost no one ever thinks about it.

Simple Math

Last week, John Mauldin wrote about the US government’s massive “unfunded liabilities.” He used an interesting metaphor to explain why people often don’t recognize it as debt.

Debt can be less specific, too. Maybe, while taking your family on a beach vacation, you notice a wedding taking place. Your 12-year-old daughter goes crazy about how romantic it is. In a moment of whimsy, you tell her you will pay for her tropical island beach wedding when she finds the right guy. That “debt,” made as a loving father to delight your daughter, gets seared into her brain. A decade later, she does find Mr. Right, and reminds you of your offer. Is it a legally enforceable debt? Probably not, but it’s at least a (now) moral obligation. You’ll either pay up or face unpleasant consequences. What is that, if not a debt?

Later, John applied the comparison to Social Security.

Think back to my example of promising your daughter the beach wedding. That is sort of what is happening with Social Security, if you had accompanied the promise by asking your daughter to save a nickel a week toward paying for it. The resulting $28 after ten years would not begin to cover the cost, but your daughter will rightly argue she did her part. You will be on the hook for the rest, just as Congress will be on the hook with angry retirees who think they “paid” for their benefits.

John is exactly right, and we know this because Social Security is going broke, as I wrote last month. All would be well if the taxes people paid into Social Security were enough to cover the benefits they receive. That’s just math.

“Ah, but Congress spent the money on other things,” you might say. That doesn’t matter. Congress borrowed cash from the Social Security trust funds and replaced it with IOUs. Social Security still “owns” all that money… and it’s not enough.

Photo: Getty Images

Too Generous

The core problem is that Social Security benefits are more generous than the taxes collected can cover. That has always been the case. Ida May Fuller, the very first Social Security recipient in 1940, won the proverbial lottery.

Ida May Fuller worked for three years under the Social Security program. The accumulated taxes on her salary during those three years was a total of $24.75. Her initial monthly check was $22.54. During her lifetime she collected a total of $22,888.92 in Social Security benefits.

The original idea was that most people who paid into the system would die before collecting much (if anything), thereby covering the longer-lived minority. That didn’t happen, because life expectancy rose.

Instead of recognizing this fact and adjusting the formulas, we plunged merrily ahead, and here we are. The government can’t pay your Social Security benefits at the current level unless it taxes other people to get the cash.

As a practical matter, Social Security works much like subsidized housing for low-income people. You pay something for what you get, but not the full amount. That why I call it “welfare.” And unlike other welfare programs, it’s not means-tested.

Photo: Getty Images

Plan a New Career

Having said Social Security is welfare, let me be clear: I don’t think that is bad. The US is a wealthy country. We can afford to keep our oldest people comfortable in their final years. The question is how to do it. The present system is not sustainable.

We could make it sustainable, maybe. The last trustee report explained how.

[T]o remain fully solvent throughout the 75-year projection period: (1) revenues would have to increase by an amount equivalent to an immediate and permanent payroll tax rate increase of 2.78 percentage points to 15.18 percent, (2) scheduled benefits would have to be reduced by an amount equivalent to an immediate and permanent reduction of about 17 percent applied to all current and future beneficiaries.

The trustees say higher taxes, lower benefits, or some combination of the two would fill the gap. Their estimate depends on some assumptions that could be wrong, so it may still not be enough. It would be a start, though—and Social Security wouldn’t be welfare anymore.

I still think the best solution is to increase the retirement age. You can do that even if Congress doesn’t require it, and I think you should. Forget about retiring at 65 or even 70. Instead, plan a new career that you can “retire into” and generate your own income, for as long as you’re physically able.

That’s my plan. If I ever get anything from Social Security, I hope not to need it. I’ll regard it as a bonus… and I’ll thank the younger generation that gives it to me.

See you at the top,

Patrick Watson

Discuss This


We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.


Mike Cassingham

July 4, 2018, 4:51 p.m.

The only solution is to keep the program and do what is necessary to fund it. The harsh fact is the majority of people will never save enough to survive old age. If we change to needs based, it will encourage even more bad behavior. Raising the retirement age sounds good until you look at the reality—Hardly anyone retires when they plan. They leave work when fired, laid off or disabled. Some cuts could be made to unfunded child and spouse benefits, but no politicians will ever have the guts. Share the pain, pay the taxes.

July 3, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

Welfare is what the public employees in my family are getting.  Here is an example: One just retired at age 50! - a California fireman with no more than a high school education who is now receiving $150,000 per year plus free medical for he and his spouse.  His pension is larger than another family member that was a doctor - a Pediatrician and he had to work until he was 62 - 12 years longer.  The fireman’s excuse is he doesn’t get Social Security.  My response is the average SS check for high school graduates is around 1,000 per month.  He is getting 12,500 per month!  That’s welfare and it’s why so many cities, counties and states are broke.

Use of this content, the Mauldin Economics website, and related sites and applications is provided under the Mauldin Economics Terms & Conditions of Use.

Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited

The information provided in this publication is private, privileged, and confidential information, licensed for your sole individual use as a subscriber. Mauldin Economics reserves all rights to the content of this publication and related materials. Forwarding, copying, disseminating, or distributing this report in whole or in part, including substantial quotation of any portion the publication or any release of specific investment recommendations, is strictly prohibited.
Participation in such activity is grounds for immediate termination of all subscriptions of registered subscribers deemed to be involved at Mauldin Economics’ sole discretion, may violate the copyright laws of the United States, and may subject the violator to legal prosecution. Mauldin Economics reserves the right to monitor the use of this publication without disclosure by any electronic means it deems necessary and may change those means without notice at any time. If you have received this publication and are not the intended subscriber, please contact


The Mauldin Economics website, Thoughts from the Frontline, The Weekly Profit, The 10th Man, Connecting the Dots, Transformational Technology Digest, Over My Shoulder, Yield Shark, Transformational Technology Alert, Rational Bear, Street Freak, ETF 20/20, In the Money, and Mauldin Economics VIP are published by Mauldin Economics, LLC Information contained in such publications is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The information contained in such publications is not intended to constitute individual investment advice and is not designed to meet your personal financial situation. The opinions expressed in such publications are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. The information in such publications may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. You are advised to discuss with your financial advisers your investment options and whether any investment is suitable for your specific needs prior to making any investments.
John Mauldin, Mauldin Economics, LLC and other entities in which he has an interest, employees, officers, family, and associates may from time to time have positions in the securities or commodities covered in these publications or web site. Corporate policies are in effect that attempt to avoid potential conflicts of interest and resolve conflicts of interest that do arise in a timely fashion.
Mauldin Economics, LLC reserves the right to cancel any subscription at any time, and if it does so it will promptly refund to the subscriber the amount of the subscription payment previously received relating to the remaining subscription period. Cancellation of a subscription may result from any unauthorized use or reproduction or rebroadcast of any Mauldin Economics publication or website, any infringement or misappropriation of Mauldin Economics, LLC’s proprietary rights, or any other reason determined in the sole discretion of Mauldin Economics, LLC.

Affiliate Notice

Mauldin Economics has affiliate agreements in place that may include fee sharing. If you have a website or newsletter and would like to be considered for inclusion in the Mauldin Economics affiliate program, please go to Likewise, from time to time Mauldin Economics may engage in affiliate programs offered by other companies, though corporate policy firmly dictates that such agreements will have no influence on any product or service recommendations, nor alter the pricing that would otherwise be available in absence of such an agreement. As always, it is important that you do your own due diligence before transacting any business with any firm, for any product or service.

© Copyright 2019 Mauldin Economics