Thoughts from the Frontline

The Answer We Don’t Want to Know

February 11, 2012

Choose your language

2012 will be the 11th time in my short life that I will be able to participate in the choosing of a president of the United States. While it may just be me, it seems like each and every election is cast as the most important election of our time and a defining moment for the American Experiment. The future of the Republic was being weighed in the balance, and only the proper outcome (which would of course be the election of the candidate you supported) would assure its survival. This week we will continue our meditations on the economic choices that confront the world, this time focusing on the US.

We will start with a thought experiment, in which I invite you to think about alternate histories. Just how important are presidents (or leaders in general) to the success or failure of the economy? And then how critical is the coming election this fall? We will assault a few of our most cherished beliefs, both from the left and from the right. If I do not offend you in the first few pages, I invite you to keep reading; I will get to you somewhere.

(Warning: I risk upsetting more people than usual, as this letter is centered on the politics of economics. I will do my dead level best to be even-handed, but there is just no pleasing everyone. So better to write what I think and at least have one person happy. Which is pretty much what I do every week, anyway.)

As I continuously argue, the most important issue facing the US is dealing with its deficit, just as that is the defining issue in much of Europe and will soon be in Japan. The longer we put off the decision, the more difficult the task and the more serious the economic impact. Without action, Italy all too soon becomes another Greece, but with real impact. They realize that and are making the efforts. But would it not have been easier for Italy with about 40% less debt-to-GDP? Perhaps not politically, at that time when they should have been working on it, but in hindsight I bet the politicians now wish they had done more. It seems we accept change only in the face of necessity and see the necessity only in a time of crisis (as one Italian more or less put it, long ago).

So we discuss politics, because the looming debt crisis (and its solution) is at its very core a political creation and must have a political solution. And once the bond market decides to provide its own solution by demanding much higher interest rates, it is too late. That's game over, and a prolonged recession if not a depression will ensue.

But before we go any farther, and quickly, if you are an accredited investor (or professional investment advisor or broker) in the US, let me invite you to a live discussion/webinar with myself and Tony Fenner-Letto of Winton Capital Management this next Tuesday, February 14, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific / 1:00 p.m. Eastern. This presentation will be hosted by my partners at Altegris Investments. Winton Capital Management is the largest and arguably the best-known managed futures firm on the planet. We will discuss their strategy for dealing with today's market environment. I will also share my current thoughts on the global economy and its outlook. Hopefully we can talk about something besides Greece (are you tired of Greece yet?).

You can get an invitation to the webinar by calling your Altegris representative at 800-828-5225. If you have not yet opened a relationship with them, I will have them call you if you register at The Mauldin Circle. A replay will be available to registrants unable to attend. I apologize for limiting this discussion to accredited investors, but we must follow the rules and regulations. I am working on doing a webinar in the near future that will not be restricted. Stay tuned. (In this regard I am president and a registered representative of Millennium Wave Securities, LLC, member FINRA.)

One further note. At the end of the letter, I will give you information and a link to be able to register for my Strategic Investment Conference, May 2-4. I expect it will sell out, as always, so I would suggest making your reservation promptly.

Now, we start today's letter in South Africa, as I wonder which continent I will finish it on. In order to be able to hit the send button while on layover in London, we'd better jump in.

What Is a President to Do?

I have long maintained that presidents take too much credit for good economic times and get altogether too much blame for bad ones. That is not to suggest that they can't make a difference by promoting certain policies over others. Clearly they can. But I think we might find, if we think about what might have been if the "other guy" had been elected, that outcomes would…

Discuss This

16 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

Page 1 of 2  1 2 > 

Matt Fox

Feb. 19, 2012, 7:11 p.m.

The ugly reality is that Americans will not willingly give up ANY benefits the believe they are ‘entitled’ to. And no Congressman will ever vote to make them do so, knowing they will not be re-elected if they do. [Who in fact would willingly do something if they know they will lose the only job they have any experience for?]

The answer seems to be to have strict short term limits so that Congressmen know they will lose their jobs anyway and therefore can afford the luxury of doing what almost every one of them knows is right.

Donal Schmidt

Feb. 19, 2012, 2:50 p.m.

John, interesting musings!  Sort of like talk about old girls friends and what-ifs.  Regardless, less deficit, now, means less pain later!

gary legon

Feb. 14, 2012, 1:30 p.m.

This time, John, you have let your own prejudices interfere with the more important points in your piece.  As several other posts have stated, Obama - hard left… surly you jest?  Intelligence on Iraq - even France bought the WMD - not true.  Deregulation having no cause of the sub prime crisis - geez.  What have you been drinking? Check out your buddy Barry Ritholz, “The Big Lie.” 
There are a few more doosies here.  Hey, so the end of Bush tax cuts would only get us 20% better—what’s wrong with that—it’s a start.
Even putting aside all that distracting nonsense, while I agree with the basic premise that we must get a grip and we must hear from the political class what they will propose,  I have no faith in that happening.  As long as the vested interests contributing, or should I say buying, congressman and presidents, it is only wishful thinking that anyone will vote for the good of the country.

Nanci Cartwright

Feb. 14, 2012, 11 a.m.

Although I am “free of state” I typcially vote Democrat.  If you were running for president, however, I would vote for you John Mauldin.  I will vote for anyone who is willing to face the tough choices ahead of us.  I’m four (I hope) years out until retirement, but even I know that Medicare and Social Security need reform if I can expect to get benefits from them into old age.  I am willing to give up the precious to me, mortgage interest benefit if it will help get us back on track.  I think a lot of us middle class (yes there are still some of us) citizens are smart enough and care enough about our children and grandchildren, to be willing to accept choices that will apply to EVERYONE.  It’s the perception that some groups are favored over others that creates dissension.  Only my opinion of course, but I am hungry for honest offerings from the politicians.  And I am hungry for honest dealings within the government.  I have never been so discouraged in my life.

James Eaton

Feb. 13, 2012, 8:13 p.m.

John,

I have been reading your posts for several years, and while I sometimes disagree with your politics (I am a registered independent voter), I applaud this post. It is perhaps your finest hour. Bravo! You have clearly outlined, in as balanced way as can be done in this political climate, what must be done. Great public service!  Now, I wonder if there are enough thoughtful voters left who understand the need to act on these problem by admitting we are all in the same boat and it is headed towards some rocks. I am modestly hopeful.  Thanks for the Call to duty!

Jim Eaton
Sun, City, AZ

stephen nally 24430

Feb. 13, 2012, 2:12 p.m.

Hi John. You are right that the day of reckoning would have been delayed couple of years under Gore. There does seem to be an inevitability about the economy that the politicians cannot influence. I haven’t seen that point before by any other commentators.

But there is the inevitable destination and then there is route we use to get there, over which a president and congress have some influence. If there had been no Iraq war, we would have spent the two trillion that it cost on something else, and almost any thing would have been less wasteful than the war. The the loss of American power (taking the eye off China, Latin America, the weakening of the alliance with continental Europe.), the rise of Iran were all caused by the Iraq war. I would say even the current conservative government of the UK is a little anti American because of Iraq. These will feed back into the economy and politics over the medium term.

A good article, the most interesting point (the economic inevitability) being obscured by some political point scoring.

Charley Sweet

Feb. 12, 2012, 8:01 p.m.

spot on, Edward

Edward Broyles

Feb. 12, 2012, 7:56 p.m.

On what planet can President Clinton be considered ‘center left’ and President Obama ‘hard left?

The difference between those two is much, much smaller than the rightward shift of the Congresses that they have each faced. This current version has made it explicitly clear that they have no interest in working with the President. In the previous, he was able to make compromises with the Republicans when he needed to, even to the consternation of liberal Democrats.

Furthermore, Greenspan is not a Keynesian. If he were, he might have been able to see the bubbles he was forming and the liquidity trap we’ve got. Or if he was actually able to see the bubbles he was forming, then he’s just a big ol’ liar.

John Seater

Feb. 12, 2012, 8:37 a.m.

This is an outstanding article, with a depth and perspective rarely seen in either political or economic analysis.  I add two points.

(1) Obama has made a difference. Possibly the worst president in the history of the country (only FDR is a rival for that distinction), Obama has taken the country a long, long way toward outright communism. We have the real thing in the federal government running two major auto companies. We have nearly the real thing in the federal government telling financial firms what they can pay their executives. We will see how Obamacare plays out, but that, too, is the real thing, with the federal government dictating specific prices and practices at the level of the individual physician. Even FDR was not so bold. There are lots of other spending, tax, and regulatory programs instituted by Obama that have sharply turned the country in the direction of central control of all significant economic activity. All of that will be very difficult to undo because of the usual inertia of the political system and the worthlessness of nearly all politicians.

(2) Bernanke has made a difference. Contrary to the standard conservative complaints, Bernanke is a genuine hero, single-handedly preventing a collapse of the financial system that would have turned the worst recession since the Great Depression into an outright repetition of the original. He is fully aware that the increase in the monetary base over the last three years must be reversed once the money multiplier rises back toward its normal level. Whether Congress and the public will let him withdraw the currency and reduce the base when the time comes remains to be seen.

Chris Steele 34944

Feb. 11, 2012, 9:23 p.m.

This is a bit old but probably still illustrates nicely the extremely hard choices we face:  http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/13/weekinreview/deficits-graphic.html

If you want to be surprised by something that goes beyond talking points vis-a-vis the health care legislation and how it is a small start on one of the deficit drivers, spend about 55 minutes listening to this Minnesota Public Radio program:  http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2012/01/25/midmorning1/

Page 1 of 2  1 2 >