Outside the Box

Things That Make You Go Hmmm…

November 15, 2011

What do the “Big Fitz,” the largest ship ever to sail the Great Lakes, and the Eurozone have in common? Hint: the former sank without a trace. Or, as Grant Williams so eloquently puts it, in his Things That Make You Go Hmmm… for Nov. 13 (this week’s Outside the Box), “One can’t help but think … that this week may well have brought us to the wall at the end of the road down which Europe has been kicking the can for quite some time now.”

Grant inspects the SS Europe from bow to stern and concludes: “The smoke has pretty much cleared now and those in charge of the SS Europe are left with a stark choice – print money or allow the break-up of the Eurozone and the end of the common currency known as the Euro. At this point it really IS that simple.”

So come on along as Grant takes us on an eye-opening and at times jaw-dropping ride – there are some real insights here. From his perch in Singapore he sees the same problems I do, just from the other side of the globe. And that perspective is worth your time.

As you read this, I am on my way to Capitol Hill to meet with a member of the Super-Committee. If there is anything I can report, you will get it this weekend. I hope I can bring good news at some point. Then it’s back to the UBS Wealth Management Conference in time to hear Ken Rogoff (and Alan Greenspan) on a panel. I am looking forward to that. Tomorrow night in my own bed again. And be looking for a special note from me on Thursday.

Your trying to figure out how we get out of this mess analyst,

John Mauldin, Editor
Outside the Box

Get John Mauldin's Over My Shoulder

"Must See" Research Directly from John Mauldin to You

Be the best-informed person in the room
with your very own risk-free trial of Over My Shoulder.
Join John Mauldin's private readers’ circle, today.


Things That Make You Go Hmmm...

“Common responsibility for the European currency will also engender a common decision-making instance for the European economy. It is unthinkable to have a European central bank but not a common leadership for the European economy. If there is no counterweight to the ECB in European economy policy, then we will be left with the incomplete construction which we have today… However even if the building is not finished it is still true that monetary union is part of a supranational constitution… It is our task for the future to work with the appropriate means for the transfer of traditional elements of national sovereignty to the European level.”
– Italian President Carlo Ciampi, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, February 8, 2000

“The euro is Europe’s key to the 21st century. The era of solo national fiscal and economic policy is over.”
– German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, December 31, 1998

“No amount of synthesized growth can evaporate global debt. Trying to sell creditors, debtors and taxpayers on the idea that it can be done is a futile and dangerious proposition. Time is not a variable. There is debt that is owed and only money or assets-in-kind can satisfy it.”
– Paul Brodsky / Lee Quanitance

Big Fitz sounds like the name of a Heavyweight Champ - or the affectionate nickname given to the regular in a neighbourhood bar whom everybody knows. Big Fitz doesn’t ordinarily sound like the name of a boat.

In the mid-1970s though, the only Big Fitz anybody spoke about in Duluth, Minnesota was the Great Lakes freighter that carried taconite from Duluth to the iron works in the then-thriving Detroit, Michigan and Toledo, Ohio.

When she was launched in 1958, the SS Edmund Fitzgerald was the largest boat on the Great Lakes. 729 feet long with a 75ft beam and a 25 foot draft, she could carry 26,000 DWT in her 33’ 4” deep hold. Powered by a Coal fired Westinghouse Electric Corporation steam turbine 2 cylinder, she had a top speed of 14 knots and carried a crew of 29.

For 17 years, the floating workhorse ploughed back and forth across Lake Superior, setting seasonal haul records six times and became a firm favourite with boatwatchers (yes, they do exist) due to her size and her record-breaking exploits. Besides her affectionate soubriquet, the SS Edmund Fitzgerald was also known as The Titanic Of The Great Lakes.

On November 9, 1975, Big Fitz was loaded with 26,116 tons of taconite iron ore pellets in Superior, Wisconsin and embarked on what would tragically turn out to be her final voyage - a routine crossing of Lake Superior, bound for a steel mill in Detroit, Michigan.

The next day, November 10th, Big Fitz found herself caught in the midst of a massive winter storm, with 35 ft waves and hurricane force winds. Captain Ernest McSorely, a 44-year veteran, made contact with the Avafor, a nearby ship, and reported that he had encountered “one of the worst seas he had ever been in”.

A couple of hours later, with Big Fitz roughly 17 miles from the relative safety of Whitefish Bay at the northeastern tip of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, another ship made contact and was told that the Titanic of The Great Lakes was holding her own.

Then something strange happened.

(History Channel): ...minutes afterward, the Fitzgerald disappeared from radar screens. A subsequent investigation showed that the sinking of the Fitzgerald occurred very suddenly; no distress signal was sent and the condition of the lifeboats suggested that little or no attempt was made to abandon the ship.

Subsequently, many theories on what caused the SS Edmund Fitzgerald to capsize and sink 530 feet to the lake bed almost instantly were put forward.

(History Channel): One possible reason for the wreck is that the Fitzgerald was carrying too much cargo. This made the ship sit low in the water and made it more vulnerable to being overwhelmed by a sudden large wave. The official report also cited the possibility that the hatches to the cargo area may have been faulty, leading to a sudden shift of the cargo that capsized the boat.

Either way, it didn’t matter. Big Fitz sank - quickly. So quickly in fact that nobody was saved and all 29 crew members perished in the icy waters of Lake Superior. Big Fitz had been battling the odds for several hours and things had looked bleak but she was managing to stay above water until, suddenly, without warning, she didn’t.

This week’s anniversary of the tragic sinking of Big Fitz got me thinking about the Euro - another behemoth currently navigating some extremely choppy waters but managing to keep herself above water. Holding her own, if you will.

The odds have been stacked heavily against the common currency for some time now and yet, despite a clearly unsustainable level of debt, several countries who should never have been allowed through the doors of the Eurozone, rapidly slowing growth and a group of basket-case politicians who have redefined the meaning of ineptitude, if you had shorted the Euro on January 7th of this year, you would now be staring at a loss of roughly 6% on your investment (chart, below).


SOURCE: BLOOMBERG

To have sat and read the headlines these past 10 months and yet to be losing money on a short Euro position would have doubtless sent even the most stoic of investors in search of a stiff drink or some heavy counselling - but that’s the way these things go sometimes. Things stay afloat against all the odds - until, suddenly, they don’t.

One can’t help but think, however, that this week may well have brought us to the wall at the end of the road down which Europe has been kicking the can for quite some time now.

With the long-expected demise last week of the Papandreou government and now the swift fall of Silvio Berlusconi’s administration in Italy, events in Europe picked up speed as they move rapidly towards the kind of definitive end that we have needed for some time now, but that the prevaricating of the various bureaucrats in Brussels and beyond have denied us.

The smoke has pretty much cleared now and those in charge of the SS Europe are left with a stark choice - print money or allow the break-up of the Eurozone and the end of the common currency known as the Euro. At this point it really IS that simple.

The impediment to a EuroTARP or QEU program remains Germany. That’s pretty much it. Sure, the Dutch and the Finns and even the Austrians all pay lip service to a hard line on monetary easing, but, as oneby- one the formerly ‘strong’ countries get dragged into the maelstrom of the peripherals leaving a new country exposed on the outer fringes of the ‘core’, it becomes more and more obvious that somehow, some way, Germany has to find a way of justifying an action that is anathema to the citizens of Europe’s powerhouse economy. The blowout in the spread between Austrian and German 10yr bonds this week highlights that perfectly (chart, below).


SOURCE: BLOOMBERG

Weimar hyperinflation is still a very vivid memory for many Germans and, as Adam Fergusson explained in his seminal work ‘When Money Dies, the reasons why Germany is so set against the idea of money-printing are clear:

Over most of Germany the lead was beginning to disappear overnight from roofs. Petrol was syphoned from the tanks of motor cars. Barter was already a usual form of exchange; but now commodities such as brass and fuel were becoming the currency of ordinary purchase and payment. A cinema seat cost a lump of coal. With a bottle of paraffin one might buy a shirt; with that shirt, the potatoes needed by one’s family. Herr von der Osten kept a girl friend in the provincial Capital, for whose room in 1922 he had paid half a pound of butter a month: by the summer of 1923 it was costing him a whole pound. ‘The Middle Ages came back,’ Erna von Pustau said.

Communities printed their own money, based on goods, on a certain amount of potatoes, or rye, for instance. Shoe factories paid their workers in bonds for shoes which they could exchange at the bakery for bread or the meat market for meat.

Those with foreign currency, becoming easily the most acceptable paper medium, had the greatest scope for finding bargains. The power of the dollar, in particular, far exceeded its nominal rate of exchange. Finding himself with a single dollar bill early in 1923, von der Osten got hold of six friends and went to Berlin one evening determined to blow the lot; but early the next morning, long after dinner, and many nightclubs later, they still had change in their pockets. There were stories of Americans in the greatest difficulties in Berlin because no-one had enough marks to change a five-dollar bill: of others who ran up accounts (to be paid off later in depreciated currency) on the strength of even bigger foreign notes which, after meals or services had been obtained, could not be changed; and of foreign students who bought up whole rows of houses out of their allowances.

There were stories of shoppers who found that thieves had stolen the baskets and suitcases in which they carried their money, leaving the money itself behind on the ground; and of life supported by selling every day or so a single tiny link from a long gold crucifix chain. There were stories (many of them, as the summer wore on and as exchange rates altered several times a day) of restaurant meals which cost more when the bills came than when they were ordered. A 5,000-mark cup of coffee would cost 8,000 marks by the time it was drunk.

Stories like these still live and breathe in Germany so it is no surprise that the language of Mrs. Merkel and Messrs. Schauble, Wiedmann et al have been defiant whenever the subject of money-printing has arisen. But this week, as the Eurozone threatened to spiral out of control, it became abundantly clear that the Euro has reached the point of no-return.

The ECB now has to either become the lender of last resort that Europe so desperately needs (and trample over Germany’s sensitivities in the process), or the Euro must fall. There is no other choice.

On Thursday, Italy’s 10-year bond yield spiked to 7.5%. Presumably the only thing that stopped it shooting higher still was aggressive buying on the part of the SMP (we shall hopefully find out on Monday when the weekly totals are updated on the ECB website), but whatever the reason for the sudden and sharp retracement to 6.5% on Friday (surely it wasn’t due to the news that Massimo Monti had been touted as Prime Minister in Berlusconi’s stead? Surely?), you can be certain the bond market has not finished with Italy just yet.


SOURCE: BLOOMBERG

BUT..... Italy is running a primary surplus. The only thing sending her over the edge is the simple fact that the Italian government cannot borrow at low-enough rates. At 4% (where rates were a year ago), they can gradually begin to adjust their debt ratios and still finance their borrowing - it will not be easy, but they, unlike their spendthrift cousins in the Aegean, have one of the highest savings rates in the OECD (although, as you can see from the chart, below, that savings rate has been eaten into rapidly over the past five years).


SOURCE: BLOOMBERG

But what of that other ‘Big Fitz’, the Euro?

Any attempt to make a significant change to either the treaties that surround the common currency or the constituent members of the union would require a hellacious amount of maneuvering in order to pull them off and, like the notion of Greece (or any weakened EU member) ever being allowed to leave the Euro, the idea of either a fiscal union, the ECB becoming the lender of last resort or, God forbid, Germany exiting, stage left, was strictly verboten - at least until this week:

(UK Daily Telegraph): German and French officials have discussed plans for a radical overhaul of the European Union that would involve setting up a more integrated and potentially smaller eurozone, EU sources say.

“France and Germany have had intense consultations on this issue over the last months, at all levels,” a senior EU official in Brussels told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the discussions.

“We need to move very cautiously, but the truth is that we need to establish exactly the list of those who don’t want to be part of the club and those who simply cannot be part,” the official said.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy gave some flavour of his thinking during an address to students in the eastern French city of Strasbourg on Tuesday, when he said a two-speed Europe - the eurozone moving ahead more rapidly than all 27 countries in the EU - was the only model for the future.

Pretty conclusive.

Naturally, any such plan was immediately denied by ‘a spokesman’:

A French finance ministry spokesman denied there was any project in the works to reduce the currency bloc’s membership.

“There have been no conversations between French and German authorities at any level on decreasing the size of the eurozone,” the spokesman said.

But this time it really WAS different as the Germans, too, were talking about the possibility of exits from the Eurozone:

One senior German government official said it was a case of pruning the eurozone to make it stronger.

“You’ll still call it the euro, but it will be fewer countries,” he said, without identifying those that would have to drop out.

“We won’t be able to speak with one voice and make the tough decisions in the eurozone as it is today. You can’t have one country, one vote,” he said, referring to rules that have made decisionmaking complex and slow, exacerbating the crisis.

If you listen very carefully, you can hear the subtle changes that make it pretty clear that German officials are now trying to find a way to make ‘temporary’ money-printing palatable to the German electorate. The tabling of possible exits from the Eurozone was the first flare sent up, next was the discussion of a breakaway union featuring the ‘strong’ countries, but immediately, Frau Merkel dropped the hammer with this stark warning to her constituents (delivered at just the right degree of arm’s length, of course):

(Businessweek): Germany will resist any attempt to reduce the euro region to its strongest members to increase its stability, the parliamentary finance spokesman for Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union said.

“Such a shrinking process would be deadly for Germany because we would end up in a mini-euro zone with all the effects you can see in Switzerland,” Michael Meister, who is also a CDU deputy floor leader, said today in a phone interview in Berlin. “It would be a deadly development for an export country like Germany. It can’t be in our interest at all and if it’s not in our interest, we should do everything to keep it from happening.”

Once more, with feeling:

It would be a deadly development for an export country like Germany. It can’t be in our interest at all and if it’s not in our interest, we should do everything to keep it from happening.”


SOURCE: BLOOMBERG

There it is.

That is the first step in a move to persuade the German people that a EuroTARP or some form of QEU will be ‘manageable’ and will not cause the runaway inflation of which Germans are terrified. It will probably be proposed as a program designed to alleviate the pressure facing the likes of Italy, Spain and Portugal and its architects will point to the (relatively) benign US CPI numbers in the wake of repeated Quantitative Easing as testament to the fact that money printing doesn’t necessarily lead to hyperinflation - although, very quietly, US CPI has almost quadrupled since the beginning of QE2 and its trajectory remains solidly bottom-left to top-right.


SOURCE: ST LOUIS FED

They WON’T mention the US’ adjusted monetary base (chart above), nor will they bring up UK CPI (chart, below) which is moving ever faster away from its target rate of 2% - currently standing at a breathtaking 5.2% - and will assure the citizens of Germany that there will be a cap on inflation past which the ECB WILL NOT go - either that or it will be a program that will be wound back after, say, two years by which time everything will be on the mend again.


SOURCE: BLOOMBERG

Mach dir keine Sorgen. Wir haben alles unter Kontrolle.

Don’t worry. We’ve got it all under control.

Of course, this assumes that the vagaries of a vastly expanded money supply can be controlled once released into the wild and, as Weimar Germany, the Zimbabwe of Gideon Gono, Eduardo Duhalde’s Argentina and, to a lesser extent, even the America of Paul Volcker in the 1980s bear witness, once this particular beast is unleashed it can take some pretty drastic tranquilizers to get it back in the cage again.

No matter for now though, as Europe’s problems are both immediate and pressing. The Eurocrats will eschew the potential pitfalls of runaway inflation in favour of the short-term fix of money-printing. Lots and lots of money-printing.

In addition to Frau Merkel’s Michael Meister‘s dire warning, other headlines this week have been very carefully laying the groundwork for a speech I dare say we’ll be seeing soon about how, much as it is against the original concept of the Euro, a temporary bout of Quantitative Easing is necessary to save Europe and the Euro from destruction. We will be in ‘desperate times’, will require ‘bold action’ and can have ‘confidence’ in the ability of Europe’s leaders to ensure there is no inflationary impact from any monetization. The gang is definitely all here...:

(NY Times): Europe’s economic outlook received a fresh dose of gloom Thursday, when the European Commission warned that the Continent’s economies were stalled and faced the risk of a double-dip recession.

“The recovery in the European Union has now come to a standstill, and there is a risk of a new recession,” Olli Rehn, the European commissioner for economic and monetary affairs, told reporters in Brussels.

“This forecast is in fact the last wake-up call,” he added.

(UK Daily Telegraph): Barack Obama, the US President, tonight urged Europe to provide “strong” assurances that countries like Italy will be able to finance their debt.

“We are not going to see massive growth out of Europe until the problem is resolved and that will have a dampening effect on the overall global economy.”

Speaking at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, Mr Obama said: “It’s not going to be addressed over night. So it is important that Europe as a whole stands behind its Eurozone members.”

(UK Daily Telegraph): Europe must “move quickly” to control its spreading debt crisis, because the volatility it is causing is the “central challenge” to global growth, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said.

“We are all directly affected by the crisis in Europe, but the economies gathered here are in a better position than most to take steps to strengthen growth in the face of these pressures from Europe.”

Mr Geithner added that the basic framework for the European recovery was good.

“But we need to see it put in place with the speed that markets require and with the force that restores confidence,” he said. “They’re moving ahead. We just need to see them move a little more quickly and with a little more force behind it.”

(Todayonline): The global economy could suffer a “lost decade” unless nations act together to counter threats to growth, International Monetary Fund managing director Christine Lagarde warned yesterday.

Speaking at a financial forum, Ms Lagarde said: “There are clearly clouds on the horizon ... particularly in the advanced economies and particularly so in the European Union and the United States.” Said Ms Lagarde: “If we do not act, and act together, we could enter a downward spiral of uncertainty, financial instability and a collapse in global demand. Ultimately, we could face a lost decade of low growth and high unemployment.”

Let’s see.... is that everybody pulling in the same direction? US President? Check. US Treasury Secretary? Check. EU commissioner for monetary & economic affairs? Check. Head of the IMF? Check. German and French heads of state? Check. Anybody else?

(Reuters): “I refuse to even speculate about so-called two-speed Europe,” Czech Finance Minister Miroslav Kalousek said in response to Reuters questions on the matter.

“That would go against the Czech Republic’s interests.”

Czechs? Check. Hell, they’re not even IN the Eurozone yet.

I guess that just leaves the big dog, China:

(Brecorder): Chinese President Hu Jintao warned on Saturday that the global economy recovery was under threat and called for efforts to boost growth and liberalize trade.

“The global economic recovery is fraught with greater instability and uncertainty,” Hu said during a speech in Honolulu ahead of a summit of Asia-Pacific leaders.

Referring to Europe’s sovereign debt crisis, he said the world must remain committed to “ensuring strong growth in order to add momentum to the economic development of the Asia-Pacific and beyond.”

So there we have it. A carefully crafted scenario which will give Germany the ability to stand astride the world stage by giving up its objections to money-printing (temporarily, you understand) in the interests of the global good; the all-new Committee To Save The World.

Judging by the Daily Telegraph story on page 20 of this week’s Things That Make You Go Hmmm..... this cunning plan comes not a moment too soon (can you say ‘Ponzi’?):

(UK Daily Telegraph): Europe’s €1 trillion (£854bn) rescue fund has been forced to buy its own debt as outside investors become increasingly concerned about the worsening eurozone sovereign debt crisis.

The European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) last week announced it had successfully sold a €3bn 10-year bond in support of Ireland.

However, The Sunday Telegraph can reveal that target was only met after the EFSF resorted to buying up several hundred million euros worth of the bonds.

Sources said the EFSF had spent more than €100m buying up its own bonds to help it achieve its funding target after the banks leading the deal were only able to find about €2.7bn of outside demand for the debt.

Speechless.


SOURCE: BLOOMBERG

But before we finish for today, we return to our own ‘Big Fitz’ of the currency markets - the Euro - as it struggles to stay afloat against all the odds. So far, it has been managing quite nicely, although the technical picture has been deteriorating rather dramatically (see chart, above). Once the now-inevitable European money-printing begins, it’s hard to make a case for a strong Euro - particularly in light of weakening economic data across the core of the region - from the French trade balance (which showed a €6.303 billion deficit in September - the seventh largest single-month deficit in French history and a staggering 46% m-o-m decline), to a plunge in French exports that matched the lows seen in 2008-9, to Germany’s Industrial output (which fell almost 3% in September) and Industrial Orders (which fell 3.6% m-o-m) and on to the rise in unemployment in Germany - the first such increase for 28 months.

Mario Draghi’s rate cut is just the beginning. Interest rates in the EU are heading below 1% in a hurry if the recent data are anything to go by and, once QEU or the EuroTARP commence, Europe’s Big Fitz , which has stayed afloat for so long against all the odds, will likely sink - suddenly and without warning.

You have been... oh, wait...

 

Get Varying Expert Opinions in One Publication
with John Mauldin’s Outside the Box

Discuss This

0 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

Peter J Taylor

Nov. 20, 2011, 9:22 p.m.

Inflation changes buying habits in three stages:
Stage 1: “I’m going to need some of those next month. Better buy them now before the price rises.”
Stage 2: “I’ll probably need some of those some time. Better buy them now whilst I can afford them.”
Stage 3: “I may never need those, but I’ll use my depreciating cash to buy them now, to sell or barter later.”
In November 1923, one German lady, who had been rich, entered a shop to invest her rapidly depreciating savings in durable goods to sell on later.
“Sorry, said the shopkeeper, I’ve nothing left but BEDPANS”.
“How many have you got?”
“About 500.”
“I’ll buy them all.”
So she handed over her barrow-full of banknotes to the shopkeeper, and filled the barrow with bedpans. In fact she had to make several journeys.
Then the government introduced the Rentenmark, almost overnight. The new currency was backed by a mortgage on all industrial and agricultural resources, including the railroads. It was accepted and trusted because people wanted it to be accepted and trusted.
The market for bedpans disappeared overnight.

Hans Krauklis

Nov. 17, 2011, 10:20 a.m.

I agree with John Mauldin’s and Grant Williams’ conclusion that perhaps the only way to manage the Euro-crisis is by the ECB involving itself in a large-scale TARP-like exercise.  The price for Europeans and the rest of the world will still be high, but there do not seem to be viable alternatives left on the table.

Back in late September / early October I participated in a blog discussion sponsored by the German national TV network ZDF (http://blog.zdf.de/zdflogin/2011/09/29/es-kann-sein-dass-wir-haften-muessen/ ) with Dr Michael Meister, who is also a CDU deputy floor leader in Ms Merkelâ??s coalition government.  I have translated my comments from German to English, below:

- - -

Comment 7: In my opinion we need to restate the basics (about the Euro crisis) in this discussion (blog): Whoever buys foreign (eg Greek) government bonds normally has to weigh two risks: the currency risk and the creditworthiness of the borrower state (eg Greece). This was the case before the introduction of the Euro. Within the Euro-zone the currency risk is eliminated, however, there remains the credit risk. (Why has this risk been seemingly ignored?)

Logically, therefore, the investors (ie banks) need to accept potential losses. If this should lead to the bankruptcy of large banks (“too big to fail”), the home state would need to, if necessary, take over these banks temporarily and re-capitalize them, in order to restore confidence and protect the domestic economy.

It would be better to wipe the slate clean and to limit losses, rather than to drag out the Euro-crisis. It is also not acceptable that taxpayers should be on the hook for the entire bill, while shareholders of the banks get away relatively unscathed.

Hans Krauklis | 29. September 2011 | 06:44 |

- - -

Comment 11: I am pleased that Dr. Meister took up my theme—to consider the creditworthiness of debtor countries and the respective pricing of investor risk. It would be highly regrettable if by disregarding this fundamental factor the Euro and possibly the whole European project were to be irreparably damaged.

The currently almost adopted “rescue umbrella” [ETSF bail-out fund] of â?¬ 440 billion is, it seems, not enough to get the Euro-crisis under control, and targeted “leverage” will only increase the risk for donor and guarantor countries. The prestigious U.S. ‘think tank’ STRATFOR estimates that a truly effective “shield” would need to be raised to over two trillion (2000 billion) Euros, if Italy and Spain should look for protection under it as well. The risk of becoming infected is growing even for the major donor countries, since the PIGS countries cannot credibly guarantee their share of the â??rescue umbrellaâ?.

In its current economic crisis Greece cannot meet the conditions of the “Troika” anyway. Thus, will the next installments of the “bailout” be paid out under softened conditions? In this way the Euro crisis will only be dragged out; it probably will affect the other “PIGS” countries and become probably even more expensive. It would be better to get on top of the crisis now.

In my view, the European Central Bank (ECB) may have revealed a potentially viable alternative path; however, the ECB is taking it currently in the wrong direction, namely in that it buys new PIGS government bonds.

My suggestion would be that the ECB should offer to buy any PIGS existing bonds, but at a moderate discount (“processing fees”), which should hit the banks and other investors in the pocket book, but without making them illiquid. At the same time - sooner rather than later - the ECB should state that it would buy additional bonds only at realistic market prices, if at all. For existing bought-up PIGS bonds, the ECB could then negotiate at a later date with the debtor countries and, if necessary, unilaterally provide for write-downs in its portfolios (“haircuts”).

This change in the ECB’s mandate would of course need to be secured by renegotiated treaty. The central bank (Federal Reserve) of the U.S. has indeed shown us by example how to do “quantitative easing” on a large scale, without driving the U.S. dollar into the ground for the time being. The effect of such an ECB action would probably be a long-term devaluation and inflationary trend of the Euro, but that could be managed. On the other hand, Europe would remain capable of action and the Euro less exposed.

Although in this way countries like Greece would not be freed suddenly from their debts, but with the ECB as a negotiating partner and the declared will of the States of the Euro-zone not to let drop weaker partners, sustainable solutions might be easier to find “in-house”.

These countries would need to negotiate sales of new government bonds at commercial interest rates, and if these rates are too high, the partner countries and the IMF might be able to assist. Mandated structural change and savings requirements should, however, be subject to a certain amount of consideration of the social consequences and should encourage competitiveness and economic growth at least in the medium and long term.

In other words, under my approach, the ECB would sequester a large portion of the PIGS old debts, and the “Troika” (IMF, EU and the ECB) would provide to a limited extent any necessary assistance for unavoidable new debt.

Hans Krauklis | 4. Oktober 2011 | 15:00 |

Robin Day

Nov. 15, 2011, 11:33 p.m.

Further to my earlier comment, I see in today’s business news that Europe is proposing to ban naked CDS going forward. Many will argue that doing so reduces market efficiency and liquidity, however, when outstanding naked CDS exposure is estimated at least 20 times global GDP, I believe it is excessive and must be curtailed. With a ban on naked CDS, gov’ts must then continue to print sufficient money to make good on sovereign debt as it matures, ensuring no outstanding naked CDS claims are triggered as they could snow ball into a collapse of the system…..I believe gov’ts will see the resulting wage and price inflation as a lesser evil.

Bill Yoe

Nov. 15, 2011, 6:46 p.m.

Way too much information.  Keep it simple and direct or you will lose your audience.

Robin Day

Nov. 15, 2011, 3:10 p.m.

THE problem as I see it is that naked CDS exposure on sovereign debt is about two orders of magnitude higher than the actual debt. This problem threatens not only Europe and the Euro, but the financial system world wide. For example, it was only a few weeks ago that JP Morgan tried to move $75 trillion (yes, trillion with a “t”)  in CDS exposure to a US gov’t insured subsidiary.

I see only one solution as follows:
1)gov’ts must print sufficient money to make sure no insured sovereign debt triggers CDS claims, and do so on an ongoing basis until leveraged CDS exposure expires with maturity of debt.
2)new rules must limit CDS coverage to only the amount of new sovereign debt issued. 

As I see it, welcome to the new world of spiralling prices and wage demands.