Outside the Box

Would the Real Peter and Paul Please Stand Up?

March 15, 2013

As I sit here in Cafayate, surrounded by sumptuous beauty and enjoying a slower pace, I find myself reflecting on the magnitude of the human economic endeavor and our search for a path to sustainable investing in a world where central bankers seem hell-bent on changing the very nature of the medium of exchange. All in the name of helping us, to be sure, with the most positive of intentions; but if you are a retired person living on your lifetime of accumulated savings, you might be wishing for a little less of what they call help and a little boost to interest rates, to help you afford a safe and pleasant retirement.

In this contemplative mode, I received a brief essay from one of my favorite thinkers, Dylan Grice, who has left the labyrinthine halls of Societe Generale to work with Edelweiss Holdings. This is a move I applaud, as I expect it will enrich us all by making his writings more accessible. He is a thinker of the very highest order and someone I go out of my way to spend time with. I am being somewhat presumptive in sending to you a portion of his inaugural appearance in Edelweiss Journal, but I don’t think he will mind. (I am under a deadline, and he is appropriately focused elsewhere at the moment.)

 Let me preview his work with this one paragraph, where he talks about that most precious of commodities, trust, and its relationship to central banks: 

Of the many elemental flaws in macroeconomic practice is the true observation that the economic variables in which we might be most interested happen to be those which lend themselves least to measurement. Th us, the statistics which we take for granted and band around freely with each other measuring such ostensibly simple concepts as inflation, wealth, capital and debt, in fact involve all sorts of hidden assumptions, short-cuts and qualifications. So many, indeed, as to render reliance on them without respect for their limitations a very dangerous thing to do. As an example, consider the damage caused by banks to themselves and others by mistaking price volatility (measurable) with risk (unmeasurable). Yet faith in false precision seems to us to be one of the many imperfections our species is cursed with.

 For those who are interested, his website is http://www.edelweissjournal.com/.

I have been seriously off the grid for a few days, up in the Andes at Bill Bonner’s hacienda, which is in as remote a place as I have ever visited. Using the term road in conjunction with getting there does not quite convey the reality. Animal paths, dry riverbeds (where we got stuck in the sand), rock-strewn trails, overhangs, gorges, and river crossings (where we once again had to be towed when we did not make it all the way across), flat tires, wrong turns on unmarked tracks leading to canyons of immense beauty but not exactly on our map. During the rainy season his place is completely inaccessible; but oh dear gods, when we arrived it was to a beauty and serenity seemingly out of place and time.

Then it was all about wood stoves, cold showers, and power for just a few hours a day, but also much laughter and thought-fueled conversation with Bill, Doug Casey, David Galland, and a few others. It is a working cattle ranch (Doug Casey calls them sand-fed beef, but there did seem to be pastures here and there), with high-altitude vineyards producing wines that Parker has rated at 93. I rode a horse and managed to not fall off, although there were a few moments when I wasn’t sure who was more scared, me or the horse.

Bill lives there a few months a year, and until I got there I did not understand the attraction. If he allows me, I will return next year, but with a more appropriate vehicle for the “roads.” 

As I sat beneath the most star-filled sky I have ever gazed upon (and I have taken in a few remote and lightless vistas), I took time to reflect on what a remarkable life I have been blessed to lead these last few years. Never in my dreams did I foresee this path. It is not just the places I go, it’s the people I meet everywhere, who invest in my own limited understanding and meager insights. What a fascinating world and time in which we find ourselves. I wake up every day hoping to continue the journey a little longer, thinking about our collective economic path and writing to you of what I learn. 

Now, let’s enjoy thinking with Dylan. (And I am off to the gym and then back to my book writing!) If you have not registered to come to my Strategic Investment Conference, May 1-3, you need to do so now. I hope we will create a time and place where you can gather your own insights and have some learning moments. This will be the best conference we have ever done. 

Your thinking about the future of work analyst,

John Mauldin, Editor
Outside the Box

Like Outside the Box?

Then you'll love John's premium publication, Over My Shoulder. Each week, after sorting through vast amounts of economic, political, and investing news, John sends Over My Shoulder subscribers his pick of the week's most important commentary and data.

It's your opportunity to get the news John thinks matters most to your finances.

Learn More About Over My Shoulder


Would the Real Peter and Paul Please Stand Up?

By Dylan Grice

In a previous life as a London-based ‘global strategist’ (I was never sure what that was) I was known as someone who was worried by QE and more generally, about the willingness of our central bankers to play games with something which I didn’t think they fully understand: money. This may be a strange, even presumptuous thing to say. Surely…

Discuss This

12 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

Page 1 of 2  1 2 > 

Matt Aizawa

April 6, 6:55 p.m.

Cantillon’s example is a bad one. What if those enjoying new wealth near the gold mine were replaced by those enjoying new wealth from an innovation? Would that be more agreeable? But would there be any difference is how those away from this “gold mine” would suffer the consequences of higher prices?

All wealth creation, at least initially, will cause some to suffer the associate price changes but that is no reason we should shut down the Silicon Valley gold mine.

The writer’s argument also misses a very important point. Monetary policy does not exist in a vacuum when global trade is so significant. BOJ can print all the yen they can but the economy can still suffer from deflation if the yen continues to strengthen. You can even do that for 20 years and have the national debt equal to 200% of the GDP and still have deflation. What does that tell you about those who think the US at debt to GDP of 100% is at a crisis point? We do not know much about this do we?

The important point is if the whole world is using the green back to finance their trade in goods, the US debt ratio should be compared with the size of global trade and not just with the US GDP.

With all due respect to the writer

Charles Adams 41473

March 19, 8:21 p.m.

Very credible point of view. Seems the best alternative is to go for gold in the face of competing devaluation.
~C Melbourne Australia

Jim Summers

March 19, 9:30 a.m.

Why put all the blame on Central Banks and not on commercial banks?  When a bank makes a bad loan which does not get repaid, someone is going to pay, and it won’t be the bank or the bankrupt borrower.  Central bankers have probably done some unwise things, but we couldn’t trust the banks to make good loans, and we couldn’t trust the rating agencies to tell us we were wrong to trust the banks.  Our trust in banks, manifest in reduced government regulation, was sorely misplaced.

All of this untrustworthy activity would have sunk the financial system if central banks hadn’t stepped in.  Maybe central bankers aren’t smart enough to get us out of this mess painlessly, but before we condemn central bankers, maybe we should consider the culpability of the financiers who got us into this mess while making themselves fabulously wealthy.

vadim.svinkin@gmail.com

March 18, 6:57 a.m.

Outstanding article!
Do you think the central bankers are trying to follow the footsteps of Vladimir Lenin, or they’re just THAT stupid?  What a nightmare they are bringing on us!

Simon Maughan 48114

March 18, 4:22 a.m.

When markets fall, the savers have the cash to buy bargains and this way the wealthy become wealthier. The losers are the debtors and the poor, who overreached aspiring to be like the others. Money printing obsfucates this correction in the name of social order.

The issue is whether the distrust caused by inflation eroding purchasing power is greater than the distrust caused by seeing an older, wealthier person buy your house and car at fire sale prices. For those who would see markets correct unabated, remember that the poor debtors may be younger, fitter and more numerous than you.

Jorge Herrera

March 17, 4:58 p.m.

Hi John, I enjoy your articles very much and keeps me on top of reality.
This is a great article, what bothers me is that with the influence and knowledge you have you elect to do nothing. You know the Federal Reserve is a racket and Fractional Reserve Lending is immoral and fraud.
Austrian Economists and we the followers of IBC ( Infinite Banking Concept)are working towards getting 10% of the population practicing Privatized Banking so we can demand a change.
As more people and businesses Practice Privatized Banking, there will be less use of banks for deposits and loans which can put a check of multiplication of free money for the banks.(Inflation)
Austrian Economists and IBC followers believe in a three point solution to the world economic problems:
1- Peg the dollar back to gold
2- Practice Privatized Banking
3- Close the Central Banks
Sounds impossible?
You know the economic path the world is on is unsustainable and possible blood and violence will be one solution.
Our solution doesn’t fire a single shot and every individual wanting to selfishly be better will help society.
“Becoming Your Own Banker” by Nelson Nash
“How Privatized Banking Really Works” by Carlos Lara and Robert P. Murphy,Ph.D.
I am curious on your comment.

Timothy Keinath

March 17, 10:26 a.m.

I agree with Nick Jacobs. It would have been far better results if the stimulus was given to the home owners to be used to get their mortgages caught up, make necessary repairs and upgrades. This would have kept people in their homes and market values would hold. the banks would not have needed bailing out. They didn’t help the home owners with that money.

I consider my self diversified with my holdings but it didn’t seem to help as all things went south including my job. Both literally and figuratively.

Tim
timak@tds.net

clarityinspires@yahoo.com

March 17, 2:35 a.m.

Simple clarity rather than the obfuscation of unreliable and endless data- it is like fresh, pure water to the mind.

Peter Hansen

March 16, 4:56 p.m.

Mr. Mauldin,  You were in the perfect setting to introduce this article, in Argentina, where the Peronist governments have sistematically destroyed trust and invented enemies of the people to stay in power for generations, the current Government being perhpas the most brash and unprincipled of the lot.  Yo shold have made reference to this, but perhaps you were too polite a guest to do so, at least before getting on the plane.

marilyn kelly

March 16, 3:09 p.m.

I have many relatives in the UK.  They are mostly middle class often with advanced degrees and live prosperous lives.  None of them have much interest in saving and investing.

If you have no savings, inflation doesn’t affect you, as long as your retirement and your pay are linked to inflation.  How about your home?  If the government restricts building as it does in the UK, your house price will more than match inflation.

Healthcare?  It’s “free”.

What me worry?

How long before the US meets this model?

Page 1 of 2  1 2 >