Toll-free: (877) 631-6311 | Local: (602) 626-3100 |
Office Closed
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Time to Get Outraged

Time to Get Outraged


This week we look at data from the Bank of International Settlements, by which (if someone does a lot of work) you can figure out how much US banks have written in credit default swaps to banks in Europe on Greek, Irish, and Portuguese debt. The details should not make you happy. I meditate on whether one should buy a house now, and then discuss “the way out” of all this mess and why we will Muddle Through. Oh, and I’ll ask you for help on yet another book project, on creating jobs. And all while trying to finish early enough to go to dinner. So let’s get started.

Is It Time to Buy a House?

The answer to that question is not simple, but let’s start with my own personal experience. I bought a home in the early ’80s in Arlington, Texas for what we thought was a fair price; but the mortgage was back-loaded, so I was not buying back much equity, just paying a lot of interest. But we had a growing family and the need for space, so we made the move. I must confess I was not the savviest loan customer 30 years ago. I am now aghast.

About eight years later we had the savings and loan crisis in Texas. Real estate became cheap, in some cases real cheap. Our family was growing again and we needed more room. One home we looked at was large and on a golf course. It had also been abandoned for a year and had some damage. The RTC (Resolution Trust Corporation) owned it (the government agency that took all the debt from the failed savings and loans). At one point, it was appraised for $810,000. The loan was (I think) about $690,000.

I had been watching friends buy apartments and loan portfolios from the RTC for a dime on the dollar. True story. The RTC would set out piles of manila folders of loans on a table. You could look the folders and then bid on them. Some of the folders had actual checks from the people who had borrowed money and were still trying to pay on cars, boats, condos, whatever. There were people who would bid the value of the actual “cash” in the folders and get the bid, as the people running the RTC were just trying to get through the mess as quickly as possible. Of course, the taxpayers made up the difference.

If you had cash, you could get apartment buildings and be on positive cash flow on day one. One friend would buy older apartments, turn them into government subsidized homes for the elderly, and get his money back within a few years. For active entrepreneurs with cash, it was a good time. If you owed money or needed money, it was very bad.

In Houston, they were auctioning off homes from the courthouse steps and people were paying for them with credit cards, they were so cheap (some 3-bedrooms went for like $6,000). The economy in Houston was imploding. The joke was, “Will the last person to leave Houston please turn out the lights?”

Anyway, we fell in love with the house in Arlington. My business had (finally!) started to do better and we could afford to “move up.” But given the real estate crash, I was still under water after eight years of making payments on my current house, by about 15% or somewhere in the mid-$20,000 range (I try to forget, as it is painful).

The home we wanted to buy was up for bid. As I said, it needed lots of work. Fire ants had eaten most of the outside wiring. There was no lawn on an almost one-acre property, as it had died the last summer from lack of water. The pool was green slime. And so on.

Like what you’re reading?

Get this free newsletter in your inbox every Saturday! Read our privacy policy here.

I put in a bid for $285,000, which was much less (maybe half) than it had cost to build, but I put down a large cash deposit with the bid and offered to take it “as is, where is.” My realtor told us we would not get it, as there were bidders who were offering as much as $50,000 more, but with some requirements. I decided to hold my ground. While this was a dream home for a country boy from a small Texas town, there were other houses going on the block regularly.

As it turned out, the next week we got a call saying the RTC had accepted the bid. When we asked why, we were told they simply did not have the time or people to oversee any “fix this” bids. Even though by a financial analysis there were better bids, it had become a matter of moving that folder off the desk, as there were roomfuls still be dealt with. And having been burned once on a mortgage, I was a lot smarter this time about interest rates and terms. (I had also been in the investment world for nine years, so had learned a few things.) About ten years later, for personal reasons, I sold the home at a nice profit, and this time had paid down the mortgage quite a bit, so I had some equity.

Since then I have leased homes or condos, and still do. I now lease because it makes sense for me, given where I am in my life. I am not sure where I’ll be in five years, or what my business will look like. The world is changing so fast. (Although I could have said that at almost any time for the last 60 years and been right.) Also, the home I lease is quite nice but would cost me about three times in monthly payments to buy it as to lease it. Does the lease price go up at renewal? Of course. But it is still a lifestyle and cash-flow decision.

Buying a home is a personal and lifestyle choice. The owners of the villa we are staying in here in Tuscany have five homes, all over the world. They buy homes that need a lot of work, make them spectacular, and then rent them out, which more or less covers their costs and return on capital; and then they stay in them when they want to. They get people to do the work, other people to pay for it, and they “live large.” Nice life.

Jeremy and Carol Leonard are friends from Canada who are here with us this weekend. He bought a home in Hawaii, where one of his businesses is. He got it for a lot less than it would cost to build, so he was not too worried about the price. He and his family now live there, and he commutes back to Edmonton from time to time for his other business (more on that later).

All that to say is that if you are in a place where you want to buy a home, now may be the right time to start thinking about it. The banks and government are simply overwhelmed with homes that have been repossessed, and it looks like there might be as many as 2 million more homes to come onto the market. Prices in many areas are going to continue to fall, and if you can get credit, mortgage rates are quite low.

If I were buying, I would want to meet agents or bankers who are in the “deal flow.” The anecdotal stories of people getting homes for what seem like very good prices, in this depressed market, are all over the internet. There are homes that are certainly below replacement costs in some areas (and not just in the US but in certain parts of Europe as well). While I think home prices should go somewhat lower, we are out of bubble territory. There are starting to be values in the housing market for savvy shoppers. Which of course is what help creates a bottom. Which I have been writing for many years should happen in 2012-13. So you can be patient, but if you want a home, put in a bid that will make you smile if you get it accepted. No rush. And there are certainly deals for people who can use a little leverage and buy rental property.

And I must admit, if there is another crisis in Europe and prices of vacation homes like the one I am staying in drop a lot? I might just jump in. I like owning stuff. But at the right price.

Time to Get Outraged by the Banks

Long-time readers know I continuously pound the table that credit default swaps need to be put on an exchange. The Frank-Dodd bill failed in so many ways to deal with the last crisis and prevent the next one, it is hard to start a list. But an analysis by economist Kash Mansori, at http://streetlightblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/betting-on-pigs.html, tears apart the mind-numbing 146-page report from the Bank of International Settlements, which is just one long set of tables and data. I spent an hour with it and almost went blind. (For data masochists, it is at http://bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qa1106.pdf.)

Kash had to do a lot of work to come up with his tables, which show how much exposure Europe and the US have to Greece, Ireland, and Portugal. (He very politely answered some questions when I emailed him.) There is a lot of useful information buried in the data, showing us who is exposed to the risk of sovereign defaults in Europe. I have openly speculated that US banks were selling CDS to Europe but had no idea how much. Now we do.

Like what you’re reading?

Get this free newsletter in your inbox every Saturday! Read our privacy policy here.

From Kash’s blog:

“Observation #1. Default Insurance Matters.

“First, the BIS data very helpfully breaks exposures into two pieces: direct exposures, which basically means creditors who own bonds issued by one of the PIGs; and indirect exposures, which for the most part means agents who sold default insurance to creditors, primarily through credit default swaps. As summarized in the following table, it seems that approximately 30% of total potential exposures to debt from the PIGs are covered by default insurance (see the figures in red). Put another way, if one of the PIGs defaults, creditors who actually hold bonds from that country will absorb about 70% of the losses, while agents (primarily banks and insurance companies) that sold insurance against the possibility of default will have to cover the remaining 30%. That's not a trivial amount. (All figures below are in billions of USD, as of the end of 2010.)

“Observation #2. Direct Exposure in Europe, Indirect in the US.

“The table above also hints at striking differences between how European and US creditors would be hit in the case of default by one of the PIGs. If Greece were to default, for example, approximately 94% of the direct losses would fall on European creditors, and only 5% would fall on US creditors. However, US banks and insurance companies would have to make about 56% of the default insurance payouts triggered by such an event, while European agents would make only 43% of those payouts.

“The next table illustrates this difference even more starkly. In the case of Greece and Portugal, the vast majority of the losses that would be borne by creditors in Europe would be direct losses. In fact, French and German creditors would almost certainly be substantial net recipients of default insurance payments. (That's less clear in the case of Ireland.) Meanwhile, US financial institutions would have to make substantial net default insurance payments, which would account for between 80% and 90% of all losses borne by the US in the case of default (see the figures in red below).

“Observation #3. Similar Overall Exposures in Europe and the US.

“Finally, it's worth noting that once you account for the substantial payouts that US agents will have to make to European creditors in the case of a default by one of the PIGs, financial institutions in the US have roughly as much to lose from default as those in France and Germany. (See the figures in blue in the table above.) The apparent eagerness of US banks and insurance companies to sell default insurance to European creditors means that they will now have to substantially share in the pain inflicted by a PIG default.

“Implications

Like what you’re reading?

Get this free newsletter in your inbox every Saturday! Read our privacy policy here.

“This has some important implications. First, US and European financial institutions are likely to have very different incentives as negotiations regarding debt restructuring and reprofiling proceed. US banks and insurance companies are surely delighted with the "soft restructuring" that is currently being discussed. Such a partial default would probably not trigger default insurance payments, and so the pain would be borne almost exclusively by European institutions. On the other hand, some time soon it seems likely that European creditors will begin to prefer a "hard restructuring" that would require default insurance payouts from the US institutions that sold such insurance. Given how strikingly one-sided the net default insurance payments will be (from the US to Europe), it's easy to imagine how that could shape future negotiations over debt relief for the PIGs.

“Second, there's an interesting puzzle here. Why have European and American financial institutions behaved so differently when it comes to the PIGs? Specifically, why have American firms been so willing to sell default insurance to the Europeans, though they have not bought much PIG debt? And conversely, why have the Europeans systematically been so eager to buy insurance for their PIG debt, even at the very high price such insurance now commands? In essence, European firms have been betting that a PIG default will happen sooner rather than later, while US firms have been betting that default would happen later or not at all.”

If I read those tables correctly, that means US banks have sold some $120 billion of credit default swaps to European banks. Let’s think about that for a minute.

When, not if, Greece defaults, US banks are going to have to dip into capital to pay those commitments. Capital that should be available for loans to businesses but will have to be paid to European banks instead. Will it be a 100% Greek default, or only 50%? If it is a default, do you have to pay all or just the defaulted portion, and when?

Why, oh why, are banks putting American taxpayers at risk, as these too-big-to-fail banks certainly are? And make no mistake, if several major banks were to collapse, our government would need to step in. The largest banks are too big for the FDIC to handle. Now, shareholders would be wiped out this time and bond holders would face haircuts. No question. But why are investment banks allowed to mix the risk with their commercial banks?

We Need a Mulligan

I occasionally golf, more in past years than today. I am a very bad golfer. I would often negotiate in friendly games a few extra “mulligans” before we started. (A mulligan is where you get to replay the ball without taking a penalty stroke.) I was actually doing my playing partners a favor by moving the game along rather than trying to find lost balls in tall grass.

I and so many other people were all for repealing Glass-Steagall back in 1998. Sometimes we just need to admit that we make mistakes, and this was a big one. We need a national mulligan, a major do-over! We should reinstate Glass-Steagall and separate investment banking from commercial banking. Yes, I know that hurts profits and maybe makes banks less competitive, but I really don’t care. When our tax dollars are risked it is just wrong.

Further, I will bet you that bank chiefs will say they have hedged their risk on European debt. OK, I would like to know, with which counterparty? AIG? Is there another AIG looming out there, selling risk insurance? Who is paying attention?

A Congressional Investigation Is Needed

Frankly, all this needs to come out in the open. Who sold this stuff to whom and for how much, and is the risk hedged, and if so to whom? Why did someone think that betting $34 billion on the ability of Greece to pay its debts was a good idea? And are the Irish CDS sold for government debt or are they bank debt? Note that we have over $100 billion in exposure to Irish debt. Long-time readers know that I think the Irish will at some point tell the ECB to stuff it on the bank debts they assumed as taxpayers. Does this put at risk all Irish debt? It’s all in those contracts.

Maybe I am overreacting (it has happened in my life), but I simply find it outrageous that banks can risk so much with so little to lose if things go bad. Just as in the subprime debacle, they make their bonuses and salaries until the end, and the public picks up the risk. Dodd-Frank was a joke. It did not solve the real problems, and has so many unintended consequences. It should be torn up and we should start over. But first we reinstate Glass-Steagall. At a very minimum, we require that banks that want to sell credit default swaps separate that division from the rest of the bank and capitalize it separately. Investors who buy from them must know that the full capital of the bank does not stand behind the CDS. I don’t care if that cuts into profits. I just don’t want the private risk and profits to become public losses.

How We Get Out of This

Like what you’re reading?

Get this free newsletter in your inbox every Saturday! Read our privacy policy here.

A good friend of ours, Jeremy Leonard, has come over from Canada to visit us for a few days. He is (among other things) in the pump business, with an office in Hawaii and in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. He just launched the Canadian branch 14 months ago. He has figured out a way to make a pump in Canada that is superior to the competition in the mining and the oil sands businesses. When we met last December he was up to ten employees. Now he is at 50 and growing. His staff in Hawaii has doubled from 5 to 10 over the last year. He has also figured out how to solve a major environmental problem in the oil sands region, and that business is growing nicely.

Over dinner tonight, we started talking about other businesses. Dr. Mike Roizen (of “You” books and Oprah fame) is coming to stay a few days next week, and he has started lots of businesses, creating over a hundred jobs. And my partners at Altegris and CMG have doubled their staffs in the last five years.

We get out of this conundrum because a million people like Jeremy figure out how to do something faster, cheaper, and better and then actually make it happen. They aren’t sitting around waiting for Greece to default first. If they are smart, they avoid doing something that will be affected by that, and they plough ahead.

And if government gets out of the way, or actually implements policies that help, the economy and employment eventually right themselves. Texas was a basket case 20 years ago. I was fortunate that my business did not depend on the local economy. I had many friends who suffered, who lost jobs and businesses. That’s part of the process. But you get back up and do what you have to do. You figure it out.

And when a nation of entrepreneurs, all working on their individual plans, get it all figured out, the economy is back on track.

In one sense, now is the best time to start a business if you can find the capital, because you can access quality help, get equipment cheaper, lower rents, etc. Challenges? Of course. That comes with the territory of starting a business, and they never end. If you decide to sit back and coast, the world will go on and swallow you up.

20 Policies to Implement to Create Jobs

Maybe I am thinking about employment because I just agreed to do a small book with Dr. Bill Dunkelberg, good friend and fishing buddy, who is also the chief economist of the National Federation of Independent Businesses. It will be on employment in the US and what the government should do to help create jobs. Bill and I have our ideas, but we are also going to “crowd source.”

We will ask our respective readers for their ideas. My bet is that we’ll get a lot better ideas than ones we come up with on our own. The plan is to have it done in time to hit the stores in January, before the political debates really heat up. Whether it will be 10 or 20 or 30 ideas, we don’t know. Not even sure of a title, but Wiley said they would publish it. It will be a fun project and is something I hope can contribute to the “cause” of growing our economy. I believe we have a bright future and want to make sure my kids have the same chances I had.

And now it is late and time to hit the send button. And when you see your congressperson, ask them to look at the credit default swaps debacle that is brewing.

Tuscany, Kiev, Geneva, and London

Tuscany is a slice of heaven. We have already booked the villa for three weeks next year. Next Thursday Trey and I leave to go to Kiev and meet with about 20 classmates from an executive course I did two years ago at Singularity University, who are flying in from all over the world. We will spend three days talking about our businesses and the future. Two years ago we spent nine days (12 hours a day) listening to the real industry leaders talk about where their tech was going, and it was totally worth it. They have another conference in October. If that type of thing interests you, you should do it. http://singularityu.org/

Like what you’re reading?

Get this free newsletter in your inbox every Saturday! Read our privacy policy here.

Then Sunday Trey and I go to Geneva, where we meet with friends and business partners, do a speech, visit CERN on Wednesday for a private tour (in exchange for a few hours of my time) and then fly on to London. On Thursday I will be a guest host on CNBC London Squawk Box and then do a few meetings and catch a plane back to Dallas. Whew! Then I’ll be home for a while.

One of the delights of having 1,000,000 closest friends read your letter is that you get to meet them from time to time. Simone Pallessi hosted us Wednesday night at a fabulous resort 20 minutes from here, put together by one of the members of the Ferragamo family. 4,500 acres, a large winery, some of the finest villas and apartment/suites/rooms, and an unbelievable golf course, all built on a 900-year-old estate with the castle tower still standing. Simone runs the place and was a very gracious host. The Brunello they make is outstanding. www.castigliondelbosco.com.

And yesterday as I was outside writing, I saw a gentleman come up to the back gate (on the road) and ask if I was John Mauldin. I said yes. Story is that last night he was driving with his wife, saw the name Trequanda, remembered Il Conte Matto, and decided to change his plans. He later got a room and came by to say thanks for the recommendation and ask me to sign my book. Turns out he owns a car dealership in California. And since he brought wine, how could I say no? Life’s little pleasures.

Time to go now, as I have guests and had to finish this after we came back from dinner. Have a great week. I am behind on my rather ambitious plans to get things done while here, but I am enjoying life. And you should too!

Your watching time pass so quickly analyst,

John Mauldin Thoughts from the Frontline
John Mauldin

Suggested Reading...

"You're scaring
me, Jared."


 

Click to
Stream



Did someone forward this article to you?

Click here to get Thoughts from the Frontline in your inbox every Saturday.


Discussion

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

0 comments

Michael Bell
June 11, 2011, 8:02 p.m.

The themes are well recognized by Mauldin’s readers. The U.S. has two cancers: the deficit/debt and a paralyzing legal system. 80,000 pages of Federal Register rules and regulations criminalizes just about anything we do. Getting Americans jobs is not just about paying workers less in Mexico or India or wherever; it is about easing up on the quagmire of regulations that employers must face. Having to fight glib lawyers in front of illiterate juries is surely just as great a deterrent to doing business in the U.S. as having to pay workers a few dollars more.

“And if government gets out of the way ...” - I couldn’t agree more. But is Congress listening? Apparently, Obamacare just added 6,000 pages of new rules and regulations to Medicare. We are going in the wrong direction on a daily basis.

carl campbell
June 11, 2011, 7:37 p.m.

There is a way to get lots of people employed, in all sorts of places, real fast.  It’s called “free market.”  No government rules on who you can hire, how much you pay, benefits, whatever.  Just two people making their own agreement, period.  I personally hired up to 15 people this way back in the 1950s.  We got along just fine.  Silly idea.  Sorry to waste your time.  Carl

Said Armutcuoglu
June 11, 2011, 7:10 p.m.

With all due respect, it costs $1.3 o $1.5 million o buy a condo in Miami beach. Same cono can be rented for $4,500/ month. After 2% real estate taxes and $1000-1500/ month maintenance fee, that’s. 2% yield (before income taxes, insurance, wear and tear, etc.) the situation in most of California, New York and the mountains is as bad or worse. The artificially low mortgage rates, the mortgage tax deduction, etc is all noise and government distortions and will not last forever.
Historically, in most of the world, real estate prices were and should be around 10x annualized rent. We are far from that in America. No government effort can fight fundementals forever. In the case of housing in America, the government effort o save the banks by artificially boosting house prices is going to end in catastrophe, in my humble opinion.

Duncan Hume
June 11, 2011, 4:52 p.m.

I am very relieved to see that you have concluded that Glass-Steagall should be reinstated, until it is you simply have a situation where the banking institutions get to gamble for free with the general public’s savings. The bankers get to keep the winnings but are not responsible for the losses.
It would be nice if those to whom the money has been entrusted were to behave responsibly but unfortunately we (I think that this is greedy shareholders - or rather their representatives who are looking to board the gravy train themselves) have allowed the remuneration of vast numbers of bank employees to grow to the point that it has no connection to the value of the services provided and this is especially attractive to selfish individuals.
The largess allocated to themselves by those at the top of the banking system has now infected all executive pay structures as evidenced by the preponderance of discussion regarding executive compensation that is becoming the dominant feature of typical AGMs. I do not believe that we get any performance improvement by making every manager a millionaire simply for doing their job, more likely there is a negative incentive for most.
This inappropriate allocation of funds is a disincentive to job creation as it reduces returns to corporations at the same time as ensuring that the success of the company is less important to the ‘gentrified’ managers. This is primarily a problem for public corporations, small entrepreneurial organisations have better ability to institute appropriate compensation plans.

Sheldon McGuire
June 11, 2011, 2:43 p.m.

Some thoughts regarding unemployment from a non-professional. There are two keys. First simplify the credit application process for small businesses. The delays and volume of paperwork will overwhelm most who wish to start a new business. Information regarding assistance also needs to be available for the credit applicant. Secondly, focus on financial education. Over and over I hear about young people who cannot write a check, figure interest payments, read and understand simple contracts, or even make change. Reasonable communication skills are also helpful. Without these skills they are of little value to an employer. I have commented to several young people that their contribution to an employer must be greater than the cost to retain them as an employee.

Paul Killinger
June 11, 2011, 2:01 p.m.

It’s an enjoyable pastime to consider the multitude of legislative measures the Congress and our President could adopt to stem our nation’s economic malaise.  We could stop spending money we don’t have or from printing more of the stuff. We could cut taxes and reduce the growing regulatory burdens on job creators. We could even get the federal government out of our business altogether.  In the immediate future, however, these are not realistic goals.  In short, we don’t need to waste time worrying about any of them, because THEY ARE NOT ABOUT TO HAPPEN NOW.

This leaves us with what is doable TODAY.  In this vein, there is only ONE realistic proposal with any chance of passage that can dramatically improve our nation’s economy.  It’s known as the “Pickens Plan,” which is contained in the proposed Natural Gas Act now before the House.  This measure, which has some 200 co-sponsors, would reduce our negative balance of payments ($41 billion last month), substitute LNG and CNG for diesel fuel and gasoline in trucks and cars (at 1/5 the present cost), curtail the need for our continued military excursions in the Middle East, and at the same time CREATE MILLIONS OF NEW AMERICAN JOBS.

By way of example, it has been reported that 50,000 new direct energy jobs have been established in Pennsylvania as a result of the development of the Marcellus gas shale.  Assuming a small 3-to-1 direct/indirect employment multiplier, that’s a total of 200,000 new jobs.  Think of all the brand new heavy equipment, fleets of pickup trucks, thousands of miles of pipe and myriad industrial supplies, not to mention the attendant employ of every type of vocation from geologists to cooks, and pipefitters to housekeepers.

And the Marcellus is only one of literally DOZENS of recent natural gas and oil discoveries in the U.S.  just now gearing up and ready to come on line.  So what can we do to assist this effort to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower gasoline prices and put Americans back to work, which will benefit virtually every struggling business across our nation?  Simply, call our Congressmen and Senators and tell them to get off the dime.  I know I am -  I’m too old and stubborn to learn to speak Chinese after all this time.

Lawrence Applebaum
June 11, 2011, 12:44 p.m.

I have a very broad interest in economics, especially what is transpiring within the US economy.  I like your weekly E-letters.  In every E-letter, I can count on you to make an important statement.  In this E-letter you wrote, “And if government gets out of the way, or actually implements policies that help, the economy and employment eventually right themselves.”

I am convinced that the current public policy being promoted by the Obama Administration is hindering the creation of jobs in the private sector.

The $ 870 billion stimulus package passed by the Congress in early 2009 is nearly a complete failure.  The reason is truly quite simple.  The money was spread throughout the Executive Branch for implementation of the stimulus program.  However, the Executive Branch is not very savvy when it comes to business and job creation.  Consequently, the money was spent on frivolous projects that did not create jobs or given to federal or state governmental agencies to secure jobs already in place.

The better solution would have been to use the money to guaranty short-term bank loans to small and medium sized businesses, the true generators of new jobs.  If a small business sees an opportunity to increase revenue; however, it needs money for equipment (motor vehicles, tools, notebook computers, etc.), essentially, its factors or production.  Without this funding, the opportunity will be lost.  I need go no further with discussion.  It is obvious that the Obama Administration blew it with the execution of the stimulus program.

Like you, I think we will muddle through.  Unfortunately, the muddling will result in the economy taking about four more years to recoup what has been lost.

The enormous national debt and the projected annual deficits are not sustainable.  To solve this problem takes great leadership and courage.  I don’t see the requisite leadership and courage displayed by the leaders in the Executive and Legislative Branches of Government.  But it is a good topic for a later discussion.

Keep up the good work producing the E-letters.

Tjemme van der Meer
June 11, 2011, 10:49 a.m.

Why so much CDS exposure in the US? Two guesses:
(*) In the US, there is a leverage limit. My guess is that CDS may not count towards this leverage limit. If I am correct, the latest Basel III leverage proposals include this kind of off-balance sheet risk.
(*) Why would the US have any European exposure at all? Global diversification of credit suggest that all global banks should have the same global credit portfolio, currency-hedged (a CDS requires less currency management). Indeed, during the credit crisis, European banks suffered from their US exposure (in the form of low-risk exposures, since that is what the European regulator focuses on).

By the way, I would hope that Greek defaults would not lead to US bank failures. If it does, someone has not properly applied concentration risk limits.

Stuart Harnden
June 11, 2011, 10:34 a.m.

Dear John,

On the topic of who may be writing insurance for all this European debt, perhaps one should find former players, like Hank Greenburg, who for the last several years has purportedly been building a shadow AIG with many of his former employees.  He, and I’m sure other former players, would love to put Humpty Dumpty back together. For some reason, they’ve all dropped off the radar screens.

As far as the “too big to fail” banks insuring European debt, why wouldn’t they?  They have no fear, after what has gone on for the last several years, that the American taxpayer will bail them out should one of the PIIGS default and they have to pay up.  This also fits the current administration’s goals of sharing the wealth and their “take down America” attitude.  I have no fear that when the ECB and the IMF come crying to us when one of the PIIGS defaults, our government will have a million reasons why it’s in America’s best interest to bail them out.  There’s absolutely no doubt in my mind it’s going to happen.

Stuart B. Harnden
Bedford, NH

scott grider
June 11, 2011, 10:20 a.m.

the financialization of practically everything, massive public debt assumed by soveriegns will obviously ultimately lead to a fiat currency crisis worldwide.

in the 11th year of a secular bear market and at the top of a QE’d equity bubble, gold is the only place to be…..its not a commodity in these times.

always appreciate your thoughts, john.

Thoughts from the Frontline

Recent Articles

Archive


Don’t worry about your money! Make the 5 investments Jared Dillian gives you, in The Awesome Portfolio. Don’t worry about your money! Make the 5 investments Jared Dillian gives you, in The Awesome Portfolio.

Thoughts from the Frontline

Follow John Mauldin as he uncovers the truth behind, and beyond, the financial headlines. This in-depth weekly dispatch helps you understand what's happening in the economy and navigate the markets with confidence.

Read Latest Edition Now

Let the master guide you through this new decade of living dangerously

John Mauldin's Thoughts from the Frontline

Free in your inbox every Saturday

By opting in you are also consenting to receive Mauldin Economics' marketing emails. You can opt-out from these at any time. Privacy Policy

Get in Touch

1417 Sadler Road
PMB 415
Fernandina Beach, FL 32034

Toll-free: (877) 631-6311
Local: (602) 626-3100

Copyright © 2022 Mauldin Economics. All rights reserved.
×
Thoughts from the Frontline

Wait! Don't leave without...

John Mauldin's Thoughts from the Frontline

Experience the legend—join one of the most widely read macroeconomic newsletters in the world. Get this free newsletter in your inbox every Saturday!

By opting in you are also consenting to receive Mauldin Economics' marketing emails. You can opt-out from these at any time. Privacy Policy