TFTF

Looking on the Bright Side

January 17, 2020

We haven’t had a lot of good news lately. Or, more precisely, we haven’t seen a lot of good news lately, though it does exist. We don’t see it because both regular media and social media usually focus on the bad.

That’s not entirely wrong. The survival imperative makes humans watch for threats, and sometimes threats are real. I write about them often, most recently in my Decade of Living Dangerously forecast (see Part 1 and Part 2). Yet good things are happening, too, and will keep happening as we move through the 2020s. Occasionally I like to note them, and that’s what we will do today.

I often say I’m short-term bearish and long-term bullish, but I’m not short-term bearish on everything. Positive events are occurring right now, all over the world. Lives are being saved, living standards are rising, children are learning. Good and bad can happen concurrently, sometimes in the same place. It’s not either/or.

Looking on the bright side also helps us discern the future. Things that work are usually things that will sell. When someone solves an important problem, it might be an investment opportunity.

So, let’s review some good news.

But first, at one point I had a connection to Bridgewater and Ray Dalio, but that email seems to have stopped working. I want to invite Ray to speak at my conference and be part of a documentary series on how we address the problems he’s highlighted. If someone from Bridgewater (I know some of you read my letter) or elsewhere could connect us, please contact my staff. I don’t want to be a bother…

Disappearing Stuff

We’ll start with the man who literally wrote the book on optimism, Matt Ridley. He explained in The Rational Optimist how history shows the world getting constantly better even as bad things happen. This shouldn’t surprise us. It’s actually quite normal.

In a Spectator column last month, Matt zeroed in on a common fallacy. Some people think all our technology and progress simply generate more “stuff” that harms the environment and eventually us, too. Certainly, some of our stuff is harmful. But the broader idea—that we consume too much—is simply wrong. We are consuming less. Here’s Ridley.

In 2011 Chris Goodall, an investor in electric vehicles, published research showing that the UK was now using not just relatively less ‘stuff’ every year, but absolutely less. Events have since vindicated his thesis. The quantity of all resources consumed per person in Britain (domestic extraction of biomass, metals, minerals and fossil fuels, plus imports minus exports) fell by a third between 2000 and 2017, from 12.5 tonnes to 8.5 tonnes. That’s a faster decline than the increase in the number of people, so it means fewer resources consumed overall.

If this doesn’t seem to make sense, then think about your own home. Mobile phones have the computing power of room-sized computers of the 1970s. I use mine instead of a camera, radio, torch, compass, map, calendar, watch, CD player, newspaper and pack of cards. LED light bulbs consume about a quarter as much electricity as incandescent bulbs for the same light. Modern buildings generally contain less steel and more of it is recycled. Offices are not yet paperless, but they use much less paper.

Even in cases when the use of stuff is not falling, it is rising more slowly than expected. For instance, experts in the 1970s forecast how much water the world would consume in the year 2000. In fact, the total usage that year was half as much as predicted. Not because there were fewer humans, but because human inventiveness allowed more efficient irrigation for agriculture, the biggest user of water.

Until recently, most economists assumed that these improvements were almost always in vain, because of rebound effects: if you cut the cost of something, people would just use more of it. Make lights less energy-hungry and people leave them on for longer. This is known as the Jevons paradox, after the 19th-century economist William Stanley Jevons, who first described it. But Andrew McAfee argues that the Jevons paradox doesn’t hold up. Suppose you switch from incandescent to LED bulbs in your house and save about three-quarters of your electricity bill for lighting. You might leave more lights on for longer, but surely not four times as long.

Efficiencies in agriculture mean the world is now approaching ‘peak farmland’—despite the growing number of people and their demand for more and better food, the productivity of agriculture is rising so fast that human needs can be supplied by a shrinking amount of land. In 2012, Jesse Ausubel of Rockefeller University and his colleagues argued that, thanks to modern technology, we use 65 per cent less land to produce a given quantity of food compared with 50 years ago. By 2050, it’s estimated that an area the size of India will have been released from the plough and the cow.

I’ve actually had a number of conversations personally with good friend and brilliant scientist Jesse Ausubel (mentioned above) about this. The late, great Andy Marshall of the Pentagon’s Net Assessment Office invited us both to his Naval War College gatherings where we brainstormed possible future scenarios. Great times. Jesse and I still meet occasionally when I’m in New York.

Jesse wrote a very important report that I highlighted a few years ago (you can read it in our archives). He explains how things are getting better by almost every measurable statistic. We are using less water to grow the same amount of food. “Water withdrawals” for agricultural purposes have been flat since 1975 while production of corn and soybeans has grown 300%, wheat 60%, and potatoes 25%. The chart below shows that we are producing about five times the amount of corn per acre vs. 70 years ago. We are literally feeding a good portion of the world, and using less land to do so.

Interestingly, the use of fertilizer skyrocketed from 1940 to about 1970 and then plateaued and is actually beginning to fall. So we’re producing far more with less fertilizer.


Source: Jesse Ausubel

It’s not just corn. You can see the same in potatoes or any other crop. Jesse argues that the world is at “peak farmland,” and will be able to feed a growing world population using current acreage or less.

Forests and woodlands have expanded in the past 50 years, and are still doing so. It is hard for us to imagine that around 1900 Connecticut had almost no forest. Logging, farming, livestock, and other human activities had decimated the forests. Yet today you can fly over Connecticut and all over New England and see large, lush, forested areas. One reason is that humans are using 70% less wood for fuel. Wood used for paper is about the same, but comes from far more efficiently managed forests.

In fact, we have seen consumption of many basic commodities peak and begin to fall over the last 10–20 years.


Source: Jesse Ausubel

Air quality is improving all over the US and Europe, and actually most of the developed world and much of the developing world. In the US, despite dramatic population and GDP growth in the past 50 years, sulfur emissions dropped 50%. That is absolutely stunning when you think about it.

The impact isn’t just on land. Here in the US, dolphins now inhabit the once-polluted Potomac River for the first time since the 1880s. The urbanization we sometimes decry (with good reasons) has a bright side. Concentrating most people in small areas reduces population density elsewhere, giving wildlife space to flourish.

Of course we have environmental challenges. But we’re learning to reduce our impact and share the planet with other creatures. I should note that, despite general optimism, Jesse Ausubel is extremely concerned for oceans and fish populations. As an example, Cape Cod’s total cod population today is a fraction of where it was two centuries ago. The pollution in the ocean is simply disgusting in many places. There are frankly some cities in Asia where I do not want to eat locally caught fish. The concerns about mercury and tuna aren’t imaginary.

We have plenty of room to do better… but we’re doing a lot.

     
-

Only until Jan. 23, 2020

This Exclusive Club Is Accepting 100 New Members

Learn about the incredible benefits and fill out a membership application today.

-
     

Saved Lives

You can find a treasure trove of positivity at Future Crunch’s Good News page. They collect short snippets with links to the original sources. You can spend days clicking through to fascinating info. It’s really good therapy if you’re discouraged about the world. I look forward to getting their email every week or so.

Many of the stories are about medical breakthroughs. The number of diseases we are learning to control, cure, or even eliminate is staggering.

  • In the UK, most people diagnosed with late-stage melanoma 10 years ago would die within months. Only one in 20 lived five years. Now the five-year survival rate is 52%, or 10 times higher than it was a decade ago, thanks to new treatments.
  • The US Food & Drug Administration last year approved a new cystic fibrosis drug combination that shows amazing results. It doesn’t just relieve symptoms but attacks the disease’s genetic root. The Washington Post reports, “Patients who were unsure about whether they should bother attending college because they had always known they would die young are now being told they should think about planning for retirement.” (I am personally quite familiar with this drug as one of my biotech investments owns a significant chunk of it. With 2020 hindsight (pardon the pun), I wish I had bought a great deal more.)
  • In the US we think of pneumonia as an older-people condition, but worldwide it is a major child killer. As recently as the 1990s, pneumonia killed more than two million children a year. That number has since dropped by almost two-thirds, thanks to better treatments as well as wider vaccination against the pathogens that cause it. The death rates are still far too high, but science is saving millions of young lives.
  • The terrifying Ebola virus is on the run. The disease that once killed thousands of Africans and threatened to spread quickly through airports around the world is becoming treatable. A new triple-antibody cocktail developed by US scientists reduces the mortality rate from 70% to as low as 6% when administered early enough.
  • The number of malaria cases in India dropped 50% from 2017 to 2018, and mortality decreased among the smaller number of people who were infected. A lot of it comes from simple mosquito nets reaching people who never had them. Treatments improved as well.
  • The American Cancer Society just reported the largest-ever one-year drop in the US cancer death rate, driven mainly by lower lung cancer mortality. Newer drugs, better surgical techniques, and better diagnosis are all helping.

I am personally following a private company (Bexion Pharmaceuticals) which is now in phase 2 trials for what looks like a “silver bullet” against all types of tumors. They are now focusing on brain tumors, pancreatic and recently colorectal cancer. I truly believe we will see cancer become a treatable nuisance by 2030. (Disclosure: I have an investment in Bexion. I now think the greater risk to my investment isn’t whether the drug works, as the evidence is pretty strong that it does, but that other therapies may be better, faster, and less expensive.)

I could list dozens of similar stories. Many more breakthroughs are coming, too, some even more impressive. They will help you even if yours isn’t one of the lives saved. People and their brains are the most important natural resource. If not stopped by disease, they become workers, have families, and occasionally do things to change the world.

And that’s before the impact of new therapies on aging and what I believe will be actual age reversal by the end of this decade or the mid-2030s at the latest. Pat Cox and I are currently exploring the possibility of funding some of these ventures.

Unlocking the Door

We are making progress above the Earth, too. If all goes well, NASA could send astronauts back to space this year for the first time since the space shuttle retired in 2011. They’ve been relying on Russian rockets for manned flights.

Several countries will be launching Mars probes this year, including another US rover that will carry a small helicopter, Yes, a robot helicopter flying over Mars. Did you imagine living long enough to see such a thing?

Perhaps even more exciting, private companies could soon start taking private passengers to space—or at least the edge of it. Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic and Blue Origin, founded by Jeff Bezos, are in advanced testing.

But the biggest breakthrough doesn’t involve sending anyone anywhere. Two companies, SpaceX and OneWeb, are building large networks of low-orbiting satellites to deliver seamless, fast internet service across the entire globe. That may seem like a small thing. It’s actually huge.

Depending on whose numbers you consult, something like half the world population still doesn’t have reliable web access. Often it’s because they live in remote areas where the infrastructure doesn’t exist and no one has a financial interest in building it. The new satellites could change the economics. Google’s high balloon project is making significant headway, too.

Getting the rest of the world online matters because among these disconnected billions are people whose ideas and talents could create even more breakthroughs. This vast, untapped resource will be a whole new market for today’s businesses and others that we can’t presently imagine. By 2030 I expect we will have unlocked that door and had a peek inside.

A Better World, by the Numbers

The late Swedish professor Hans Rosling’s book Factfulness: 10 Reasons Why We Are Wrong About the World and Why Things Are Better Than You Think is a masterpiece everyone should read. He describes our evolutionary bias to think in dichotomies: good versus evil, heroes versus villains, my country versus yours.

Dividing the world into two distinct sides is simple and intuitive, and also dramatic because it implies conflict, and we do it without thinking, all the time.

Journalists know this. They set up their narratives as conflicts between two opposing people, views, or groups… Journalists are storytellers.

We evolved as a species sitting around fires, hearing other people tell stories. It created trust and had an evolutionary purpose. And we still love our stories and storytellers. But the constant reminders of conflict and negativity infect our brains and bias our views. We extrapolate what we recently read or saw on the news to apply everywhere. It’s part of our dichotomous nature and called “recency bias.”

Rosling did a number of TED talks, but my favorite (and fun) is How Not to Be Ignorant About the World. He shows the enormous negative bias humans have about the world around them. We consistently assume things are worse than they actually are, while ignoring progress like the huge drop in global poverty.


Source: Our World in Data

Child mortality is down significantly, as is the number of people without an improved drinking water source. Life expectancy is up everywhere (except for middle-age white males in the US). Genocide and war deaths are down significantly. So is crime in the US. The number of deaths from natural disasters plummeted well over 90% in the last hundred years. Death rates from air pollution are down significantly in the last 25 years.

I could go on many more pages about the world getting better. In fact, I will do so in my next book. But I hope you get the point: Good things are happening and we should celebrate them. It doesn’t mean we should ignore less pleasant realities, nor does it excuse us from helping those who need it right now. Some problems can’t wait.

We should do what humans always have: Welcome good when we see it, and face problems head-on. That’s how we will get through the Decade of Living Dangerously.

And here’s one more piece of good news: This year, we have added even more value to our most exclusive Mauldin Economics club, the Alpha Society.

New members will receive complimentary access to the SIC 2020, which will take place at the iconic Phoenician in Scottsdale, AZ, from May 11–14. They are also invited to our brand-new members-only event, the Wealth Preservation Symposium on March 31 at the Yale Club in New York City.

Add to that lifetime access to all of our best research, and you have an unbeatable package. However, we can only accept 100 new members at this time, so please apply now.

Miami and New York

I will make a quick trip to Miami next week to meet with Dr. Mike West of AgeX (where I am currently on the Board of Directors) to discuss some of the latest developments in the age reversal space. Stay tuned. And I still have to get to New York sooner rather than later.

Many readers know I use software called Dragon to dictate these letters straight into Microsoft Word. Sometimes, words get mixed up in strange ways. We call them Dragon errors and this letter had an amusing one.

Late last night when I said corn production was up 300%, Dragon heard it as “porn production.” My editor Patrick Watson noticed this and told me, “No, John, porn production is actually up more like 50X.” Anyway, he fixed it and I saw again why we still need human editors and proofers, even with the best technology.

This whole letter has felt like my personal section, because I truly am an optimist. I feel like I am letting that side of me out to share with my friends. I am really looking forward to 2020 and I’m glad you are with me.

And with that I will hit the send button and wish you a great week!

Your walking on the sunny side of the street analyst,

John Mauldin

Thoughts From The Frontline

Did someone forward this letter to you? Click here to get Thoughts from the Frontline in your inbox every Saturday.

Discuss This

0 comments

We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.

Comments

Page 1 of 2  1 2 > 

Michael Thilgen

Jan. 26, 11:09 a.m.

Hello John,

I’ve read your posts over the last ten years, and I get the impression that you are a curious and well-informed person of good intent. Thank you for your interesting content.

Your Look on the Bright Side post caught my attention. I was encouraged to read that things are looking up due to ingenuity and improved efficiency. More humans, but less production, less stuff. More intensive agriculture on less land. Yay, humans! As you said, “Good things are happening and we should celebrate them.”

But the claim that we’re using less plastic didn’t fit with what I see in my garbage bag every week, in spite of my efforts to consume modestly and avoid plastic packaging. So I looked on the web for info on global plastic production. Industry groups, environmental groups, NGO’s all say global production is up, significantly. Similarly, the graphs I saw show global metal and fertilizer production trending upward, not downward, as your graphs show. Have you verified the data provided by others?

Habitat restoration and public education are having positive effects, especially in the developed world. Meanwhile, the species extinction rate is still climbing due to human activity- habitat loss and toxic pollution. Then there’s carbon combustion, continuing its upward trend. You’ve probably heard of that.

Overall, our impact on global ecosystem health has been and continues to be enormous. I appreciate your optimism, but it may be too soon to declare that we will change our practices quickly enough to avoid ecological catastrophe.

With best regards…

Lee Irvine

Jan. 24, 2:10 p.m.

These positive things will benefit society because the smartest people will use them. The smartest members of every family will make their families richer than their smartest ancestors could. Now that is progress.

Matt Taylor

Jan. 19, 12:29 p.m.

Thanks John, for the info on porn production. Is there an ETF for that?

jdurste1@nycap.rr.com

Jan. 19, 10:55 a.m.

Interesting piece with a lot of food for thought. Was it significant that neither “global warming” nor “climate change” rated a mention?

jdurste1@nycap.rr.com

Jan. 18, 5:08 p.m.

Interesting that there was no mention amid all the good good news, unless I missed it, of “global warming” or ‘climate change.’ What’s your view on the AGW theory, John? (Yes, I’m calling it a theory. Pity me if you must, but please don’t crucify me.)

Gary McConnell

Jan. 18, 3:26 p.m.

John, your stats on use of water are questionable. Especially with respect to commercial farming.

https://ourworldindata.org/water-use-stress#freshwater-use-in-agriculture

L M C Clark

Jan. 18, 3:21 p.m.

Dear John,

Buckle your seat belt.  Long note to say something of importance to me … what is not going well.  I am not content with the pace of efforts for improvement … well short of what needs to change, hopefully within my sell date.  See website drawdown.com.

The question is not whether the world is getting “better” but how fast “better” relative to other aspects worse, and “what”.  There is also a question of whether worse less fast in one area is OK if “better” for others.  While there is no doubt technology has enriched human life, the outcome has been poor stewardship of the planet.  Areas are clearly positive … your example incandescents to LED’s.  At what point are the negatives too high for the positives in life enrichment. 

“Productivity” improvement in agriculture feels like a Pyrrhic victory, producing more vegetables with half the nutrients per mass and less flavor … potatoes and tomatoes with little taste vs. 1950’s.  That U.S. agriculture over produces food helps the world but it is arguably based on a socialist system … payment for not planting, import tariffs, production quotas, government purchase of excess, government payments for crop failures (mutualizing losses), cheap loans, gratis science and technology assistance - mostly favoring large farm entities.

A metric of percentage of world population living in extreme poverty is a good check even as it may fail to tell the full story of the human condition, much less reflect the condition of the planet and species.  If we consider the human impact on the earth, environment, nature … here is a short list from actions and inactions.  Humanity may be “doing a lot” but is also doing many wrong things or not doing enough.  I’m an optimist, optimistic when there are observations to be optimistic about.  Reality is nuanced.

- There are an estimated 50-70% fewer insects than decades ago.  Insects are the bottom of the food chain for organisms further up which disappear with no food, humans at the top.  Bee populations (pollination of plants) are estimated 50% lower (neonicotinoids, other pesticides).  While this is occurring, warming is allowing insects (and micro organisms) to migrate to areas formerly unafflicted.  Trees are bing attacked by insects previously unable to live through Winters, e.g. Ponderosa Pines.

- A reported 60% of numbers of mammals, birds, fish, reptiles have been lost since 1970.  One estimate shows >80% of mammals lost since the dawn of human civilization.  There are continual news stories of iconic species threatened with few left - habitat destruction, “Chinese medicines”, exotic pets, furs, bush meat.  The list of extinct species lengthens each year, not by natural selection but human activities.

- Oceans and ocean species are dying from warming, pollutants and man made refuse.  Physicians now explain that our bodies are full of plastics.  Petrochemical molecules fill air, water, soil.  The Gulf of Mexico “dead zone” is at a near high, ~8000 square miles with no aquatic life … from watershed upstream fertilizer runoff The Nation may be producing less fertilizer but what is produced along with pesticides is having a disastrous effect along on waterways and running to the oceans.

- Fisheries are overfished.  Fish from the North Atlantic (and elsewhere) are notably smaller and more expensive than my childhood.  Migrating fish are available only in smaller numbers, salmon dying out from hydroelectric dams, an unintended consequence of “clean” power which seemed like a good idea at the time.  Dams and river flood control measures restrain sediment migration leading to continual coastal erosion.

- Re less consumption of commodity metals … a signal of the triumph of petrochemicals and plastics to replace metals.  In Texas there are 157 announced new chemical plants planned amid concerns for air and water contamination.  There is little doubt this will not happen.

- The worse air quality has stabilized to be merely ‘bad’ (Beijing) while a new worse is being seen in India, courtesy of coal power plants, ~150 GW new plants planned for China alone.  For nations without a grid or weak one does this make sense in a world where solar is cheaper (only if plants exercise no air quality controls)?

- Re human health … The march of medicine into the world of advanced science has been astonishing.  In the U.S. this has come without broad advances in the healthcare delivery system, except higher costs.  The U.S. spends almost 18% gdp on healthcare with many people having poor to no access to excellence of care.  The #2 country Switzerland spends almost 13% of gdp.  Yet other nations’ systems rank higher for life expectancy … U.S. expectancy has been flat since 2013, now 39th below Curacao and ahead of Poland (Puerto Rico ranks 35th).

At the risk of losing readers not receptive to climate change reports, here are well known documented observations, data and evidence.

First, a notable on screens now.  Global warming is currently affecting Australia with an estimated 1.3B animals dead, areas the size of U.S. states burned.  It’s simple to figure this out.  A hotter climate on the continent coupled with warming affected near ocean change can lead to a drought with landscape/plants more fire susceptible.  This may be the future of much of the American west.  There is no doubt warming is occurring.  However, even as we can debate causes, there are no known or hypothesized geophysical processes that would produce (rapid) warming within the timeframe seen.

- 18 of the hottest years on record occurred within the last 20, 2019 the 2d hottest.  The highest daily temperatures ever recorded were in past few years, including highest overnight temperature.

- Arctic ice is rapidly disappearing (faster than the worst forecasted) with a “northwest passage”.  Iconic polar bears and seals will survive only in small numbers.
- Antarctic ice shelf collapsing.  Some years ago a western ice mass the size of Delaware calved off into the sea.  Currently, an ice mass the size of NJ is sliding to the coast, courtesy of melted water beneath ‘lubricating’ movement (similar phenomenon in Greenland).  Penguin populations will be decimated.
- Glaciers disappearing, virtually gone in South America, North America, Himalayas/Alps forecasted in near future, Greenland producing new ‘farm land’.

The earth receives ALL of its energy from the sun (except a miniscule amount from radioactivity).  What is not reflected is absorbed (i.e. heated).  When global ice is gone reflectivity is much lower with more insolation absorbed by water and earth (than it would have been with ice).  Tundra methane hydrates thawing contribute to the problem.  Ocean temperatures rising (with acidification) extinguishes sea life (fish need oxygen, higher temperatures less dissolved oxygen).


I am not sanguine about what is occurring.  My intent in noting some is to promote recognition and acknowledgement, that though many of our lives have been enhanced by development, this isn’t the full story.  My theme and orientation is solving problems, improvement.  To this end the world is best served by mutually agreeing solutions, hopefully within a free market system affording freedoms and liberty, openness of government, rule of law, by the people.  Even if humanity escapes collapse, that global warming isn’t the dramatic threat posed, failure to come together for solutions may lead to a different system of governance as people become less complacent and disenchanted.  Politically, this is evident in countries gravitating to ‘strong man’ or strong group government.  Polls say this is favored by 20-25% of Americans, an anathema for me.

James Shutiak

Jan. 18, 12:54 p.m.

DEAR JOHN:

I AM SHOCKED THAT YOU FAIL TO MENTION THE IMMENSE PROBLEM OF :FRAUDULENT MEDIA” AS A HUGE PROBLEM IN PEOPLE BEING WELL INFORMED! ALMOST ALL MEDIA IN USA EXCEPT FOR FOX NEWS AND WALL STREET JOURNAL (THANKS TO A FOREIGN OWNER), ARE EXTREMELY BIASED FOR DEMOCRAT FRAUDSTERS. THE WASHINGTON SWAMP ALL BELONG AGAINST THE WALL FOR TREASON>

UOURS FOR TRUTH IN MEDIA,

JAMES SHUTIAK CA EXEC.MBA, CMC CFE CPA (RETIRED)

Joseph Goldberger

Jan. 18, 11:09 a.m.

Great article.  Progressives get a bad name yet when you think about all of the wonderful things happening in the world you have to accept that it is at least partly due to the push to improve life for humans on earth.  Regulations that improve water and air quality would be a small example. The recognition that human activity is indeed affecting the climate is another.  The future holds great promise even while the near future holds great peril.

Gordon Foreman

Jan. 18, 9:15 a.m.

John,
One further aspect to the improvements in the world is that humans have to reach a comfortable level of prosperity before they begin to be concerned about their environmental impact. People who are struggling to get by don’t tend to recycle or worry about future impacts of today’s decisions. They also tend to have smaller families and educate their children better.
Thus, the best thing we can do overall to continue this trend is to try to bring everyone up to at least a comfortable level of existence. Welfare will not do it. We have to make sure that everyone has opportunities to work productively, and to ensure that production is rewarded appropriately.
It’s hard for people to be concerned about others, or the future, when their present situation is precarious.

Page 1 of 2  1 2 >